Starring: Daniel Craig, Javier Bardem, Judi Dench, Ralph Fiennes, Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris
Directed by Sam Mendes
Skyfall begins gorgeously with a motorbike chase on the rooftop of Istanbul’s Grand Bazaar. It’s rounded off suitably with a picturesque but bloody final conflict with the villain at Skyfall, James Bond’s childhood home in Scotland. In between, there is a stunning shootout in Shanghai with neon lights and silhouettes for backdrop and mayhem at rush hour on the London tube. These inventively staged set-pieces alone will be worth the ticket price for most. But what of the Bond fanatics? Mendes does set the pulse racing, but also reinvents the character, the film and the franchise in ways that will leave the worshippers divided—it will underwhelm some and electrify the rest.
Bond is on a mission in Turkey to recover a stolen computer hard drive with details of undercover NATO operatives in various terrorist organisations. Meanwhile, M is under pressure to retire, MI6 is under siege with eight agents killed in a bombing of its HQ. Just when you think the villainy is going to play out in the context of the contemporary global terror scenario, you find that the enemy lies within. Deep within M and MI6.
Skyfall is an inward-looking, personal tale of passion, trust, betrayal and retribution. The orthodox villainy we associate with the series gets a shot of psychological (veering on the oedipal) evil with Silva (played with great self-possession by Javier Bardem). Inhabiting the shadows, he is, in a way, a mirror image of Bond. Daniel Craig matches his bluster and flashiness with characteristic dry wit. They joust, sparks fly and how! Bond sizzles in the company of the villain and also has a delectable repartee with M, a role Judi Dench has come to own so elegantly ever since Golden Eye.
But, Bond’s chemistry with the girls goes amiss. In fact, there isn’t really any sexy eye candy here other than a forgettable one, ok two. Even Bond’s gadgets go minimalist. Q, last played by John Cleese, takes the form of the young, “spotty” Ben Whishaw, who makes it clear that they aren’t into the “exploding pens” any more. All Bond gets is a personalised gun and a miniature radio. Writing clearly on the wall: it’s a brave new world. Keep with the times or die. As a character says, an “old dog” has “new tricks”.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Timothy Dalton acted in the very best Bond movies. I thought 'Living Daylights' was about France, when I didn't see it. The movie seems like a beautiful art film. The movie seemed humorous, as long as I viewed it. When one saw Afghan cavalry with bazookas, the first idea seemed, that they were going to use it against horses. To wonder, that Poland had problems with the earliest German tanks, with their cavalry. Can one imagine five soldiers on foot, with bazooka's against one tank, with the soldiers keeping a distance from each other? The tank is supposed to be history, before the soldiers have a look at it. But, with range finders, the five individuals could be engaged, before they see the tank. The Russian soldiers in the movie, felt they were fighting men from Mars.
Weekend boxoffice figures for Skyfall exceed 87 million dollars, the largest take for the franchise. Not my cup of tea though.
"Skyfall" is adequately over-the-top. Javier Bardem is remarkable. Imagine giving a bravura performance in a James Bond flick!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT