Inter alia, we submitted that UPA government had not been following a nuanced foreign policy in Lanka that would render justice to the war-torn Tamils while safeguarding India’s security interests. Instead, driven more by parochial prejudices and commercial interests, India’s policy has succeeded only in alienating the Tamils, who occupy two-third of the island’s coastal area, without endearing the Sinhalese in any manner. Lanka has thus been handed on a platter to the China-Pakistan axis thereby jeopardizing India’s maritime security.
We impressed upon the need for the new government to have a paradigm-shift in India’s policy towards Lanka. To facilitate this the Memorandum sought the nomination of an independent person as Special Representative for Lanka to go into all aspects of the Indo-Lanka relations, outstanding and vexing issues and come out with a comprehensive solution-oriented blueprint. This could lead to an early healing of the festering wound among the Tamils that could otherwise turn into gangrene. The foreign minister’s response was cool with the subtle message: “We know what to do!”
Obviously they knew, because within days, the chairman of ‘BJP’s Committee for Strategic Action’ and rabidly anti-Tamil Subramanian Swamy landed in Colombo with high-level delegation comprising Seshadri Chari of the RSS, Suresh Prabhu of the Shiv Sena, Madhav Nalapat of Manipal Academy and senior journalist Swapan Dasgupta to pay obeisance to President Mahinde Rajapaksa and assure him that NDA government will work as per his agenda. The Lankan President was informed that concerns of 70 million Tamils are of no relevance to Modi government since foreign policy is the exclusive preserve of the centre and that they could swing it as they wished. So elated were the Sinhalese that President’s adviser Sunimal Fernando, proclaimed in a seminar that if Swamy was to contest an election in Lanka, he would have a resounding victory!
Ever since the end of civil war in 2009, Rajapaksa has been promoting Lanka as a unitary state of Sinhala-Buddhists. He had said that the country no longer had any minority communities, but only patriots and traitors. Swamy and his team played second fiddle while stating that the war crimes issues in Lanka ‘raked-up’ by the United Nations Human Rights Commission were “contrived to belittle the importance of Rajapaksa’s victory over the traitors.” Referring to non-implementation of the 13th Amendment, the key grievance of Lankan Tamils, delegate Seshadri Chari said that it was the product of a particular situation that existed in 1987 and in the changed circumstances should be abandoned!
The fact is that in Lanka, linguistic and religious minorities are being crushed by the tyranny of the Sinhala-Buddhists who constitute 80 per cent of the population. The Northern and the Eastern Provinces, traditional homeland of the Tamils, were once strewn with thousands of temples, churches, mosques, schools, libraries and statues of eminent persons and historical monuments. Many of them have been razed to the ground. All the five renowned Hindu shrines that existed long before the advent of Buddhism in Lanka—Thirukketheeswaram, Thirukkoneswaram, Naguleswaram, Munneswaram and Thondeswaram—are now under the control of the occupying armed forces or Sinhala-Buddhists. Having subjugated the Hindu Tamils, the Sangha, as the Theravada Buddhist monks are referred to, has turned its attention to Muslims, who are also Tamil speaking.
Whatever Swami’s delegation did in Lanka was the opposite of what Tamil Nadu stands for and what Prime Minister and foreign minister told Rajapaksa when he came to Delhi to attend Modi government’s swearing-in ceremony: Abandoning the 13th Amendment could reactivate the bloody Tami Eelam struggle.
Withdrawing the March 2014 UNHRC resolution that talks of ‘significant surge in attacks against members of religious minority groups in Lanka, including Hindus, Muslims and Christians’ would be endorsing the ongoing communal agenda in the island. Both combined will have serious reverberations in Tamil Nadu.
Notwithstanding, BJP’s ‘strategy chief’ is running amuck with his self-appointed role as Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary to Sri Lanka very seriously. He lost no time in following-up the ‘success’ of his please-Rajapaksa mission and was back in Colombo in the third week of August to attend a Defence Seminar. Claiming Prime Minister Modi’s mandate to deal with Lankan affairs, Swamy has been touting himself as “Member of Parliament and President of the Janatha Party of India”. He also made many false and absurd statements on India’s policy vis-à-vis Lanka:
Swamy went on to state that India respects Lanka's right to choose with whom it wants to have friendly relations. Stating that India is not part of any strategic partnership which works against the Chinese government he added: "We are no one to tell Sri Lanka: Don't have the Chinese here or don't have the Pakistanis here. We can't. Sri Lanka won't listen even.” It would seem as if the crux of Swamy’s mission in Lanka was to facilitate smooth functioning of China-Pakistan interests in the island!
It appears that Swamy & Co are playing Rajapaksa government’s game of using the BJP to consolidate two agendas. Nationally, it is the Sinhala-Buddhist ethno-nationalism to usher in Buddhistva in Lanka, even as the RSS and the Sangh parivar are pushing the Modi government to step up the Hindutva agenda. Internationally, though, it would firm-up the China-Pakistan-Lanka nexus that could pose direct threat to India’s Southern Seaboard.
Both are high explosive. Given Tamil sensitivities and Lanka’s strategic location the shenanigans indulged by a loose cannon can have dangerous portends for India’s security and national integration. One hopes the infant government is aware of the enormity of what is at stake. Within weeks of SAARC bonhomie, Delhi is losing the plot in Islamabad. In Sri Lanka it could be much worse.
In this background, Prime Minister Modi met the six-member delegation of the Tamil National Alliance, Sri Lanka's main Tamil political party, who called on him on Friday 22 August. As per reports, Modi categorically assured them to settle the vexing Lankan issue in a manner ensuring "equality, dignity, justice and self-respect" for its Tamil minority. Prime Minister had urged "all stakeholders in Sri Lanka to engage constructively, in a spirit of partnership and mutual accommodation, towards finding a political solution that is built upon the 13th amendment of the Sri Lankan constitution." This is what the external affairs minister is not willing to say and what BJP’s ‘strategy chief’ has been trashing during his sojourn in the island nation.
Pray, who is running India’s foreign policy?
M.G. Devasahayam, a former army and IAS officer, now sees himself as an activist.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Looks like the author of this article was not interested in a serious and objective analysis of the subject and more interested in anti BJP/anti Modi propaganda. Which is what probably the owner promoters of this media house (Rahejas) want !!
very informative article...
In any case, at the end, whoever makes the foreign policies, or whoever runs the lobbying, have to answer to their Karma.
Dear Outlook India/Devasahayam,
This is a well researched article. For those complaining about Anti-BJP, it is NOT Anti-BJP because it is going to save BJP's credibility in THE LONG RUN.
I recently started reading the book by former BBC correspondent Francis Harrison's 'Still counting the dead', which was neutral. After reading your article, it is all beginning to make sense.
India, the land of spirituality, will do the right thing, this time.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT