That said, I am happy my movement is catching on. The BMC unanimously passed my resolution on decently dressing up the mannequins before putting them up on display. But I am sorry that some of the male members showed a vested interest in the matter. They demanded the removal of the mannequins and suggested they would advise female customers behind closed doors on what kind of lingerie they should wear. They got so excited I nipped this proposal in the bud.
The mayor of Mumbai is a busy man but he too has taken a keen interest in the matter, even taking it up with the CM who, I hope, understands the sentiments of the people. Very soon, we can expect some positive moves, like the appointment of a special MLLC (Mannequin Lingerie Licensing Committee) or even a judicial inquiry into the matter. Many retired high court and Supreme Court judges, I understand, have volunteered for the job (even without payment). That is Mannequin Lingerie Power for you! My party colleague Shaina N.C. who calls herself a fashion designer tried to dissuade me in this effort because she has, in the past, organised and judged lingerie contests. But nothing doing, I told her off.
Indeed, the mannequin issue has really caught on. In the past, I had broken up gambling dens but no one bothered. Now, after this, I have been featured in 241 media interviews, TV discussions and what not. The only problem was with the BBCwallahs. Since I was not fluent in English, they suggested I demonstrate what I thought was wrong with the mannequin culture. Oh no, I could not indulge in such explicit gestures and finally the interview was done in Hindi.
Mind you, this is an election year and moral policing has a captive vote-bank. I intend approaching all parties, persuade Anna Hazare to fast, ask that Kejriwal bhai to take the issue to the ‘aam aadmi’ and also humbly request Rakhi Sawant and Mallika Sherawat to lead us.
The Mumbai-based satirist is the creator of ‘Trishanku’; E-mail your secret diarist: vgangadhar70 AT gmail.com
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
At last ( after two months? ) the author has found a FEMALE to spit his venom on - but even that, for supposedly doing damage to the sisterhood's cause!
Very appropriate. The most iconic movie was Mannequin on the run, and the song 'nothing's gonna stop us now', by Starship, was beautiful. Seeing 'Back to the future' made people not want to visit the U. S., but watch movies.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT