If Dr Singh appears a tragic figure in not accelerating economic progress, Barack Obama was equally a tragic figure in his handling of the current economic mess in the US. Industrial development down, more and more unemployed, recession in all key industries. And unlike the situation confronting Dr Singh, the Republican Party in the US did not even stall the functioning of the Senate and the Congress. Obama and his followers came out with all sorts of excuses at the recent party convention at Charlotte, where the president was not the holy warrior of 2008, but a broken, bruised, tragic figure. Can Washington Post deny this?
Indirectly, by calling Dr Singh a tragic figure, the Post had honoured him and put him on a pedestal because Indian myth, legend and history are full of tragic figures who were admired and even worshipped by people. Take Lord Ram of Ayodhya, wasn’t he a tragic figure? Heir to the throne, he was banished to the forest for 14 years, his queen Sita was kidnapped to Lanka, he had to collect an army of monkeys, invade Lanka and rescue his wife who had to prove in public later that she was chaste. For the most part of his life, Ram remained a tragic figure yet was worshipped by millions of Indians. To this day, his temple at Ayodhya remains a controversial spot leading to communal tensions. Dr Singh should be proud to be bracketed with Lord Ram. Who knows, this comparison could make the BJP, VHP, RSS cadres switch allegiance to the Congress!
There are many other tragic figures, Prince Nala, Harishchandra who always told the truth and suffered for it by having dozens of movies made on his life. Dilip Kumar, acclaimed as our greatest film actor, excelled in tragic hero roles.Of course, Washington Post would not know how popular Shakespeare was in India, forced down the throats of thousands of university students. Hamlet, featuring a tragic prince, was easily the most popular play even among those who did not understand what it was all about and yet went around muttering “To be or not to be, that is the question”. Hamlet was staged all over India, in all regional languages with the hero muttering: “Revun ya na revun, yej sawal che” (Gujarati) or “Irukattuma, vendama, adu dan kelvi” (Tamil) and so on.
The Mumbai-based satirist is the creator of ‘Trishanku’; E-mail your secret diarist: vgangadhar70 AT gmail.com
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
I wonder if Washington Post people know all about our Holi scripture-Ramayana,Shri Ram,Devi Sita,monkey army,King Nala and Harishchandra etc.reportedly passing through the same state of affairs and calling them tragic figures with whom the author has attempted to compare the said tragic figure Dr.MMS, That was the era of Satyuga and as we all know all above personalities fought against evils,falsehood and to end dishonest policies prevailed then. Is Dr.MMS who is surrounded by so called honest leaders is fighting with the same spirit ?. Keeping mum and watching just what is happening with closed eyes can not be said to be the right policy in the interest of nation.
P.Gautampurkar,Sawai Madhopur ,Rajasthan,India.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT