“Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.”
—A Perfect Circle
—A Perfect Circle
She wanted to live, she said. After being gang-raped, tortured, beaten to a pulp, dismembered and gutted. After her mauled and mangled self was tossed out of a bus that tried to crush her, and passed by citizens who didn’t care to help.
What happened to Jagruti is particularly heartbreaking, but let's not forget our long and inglorious history of rape in general, and gang rapes in particular. Some have received public (at times even legislative) attention, including Mathura, Manorama, Bhanwari Devi, Suryanelli, or the woman kidnapped on the Gurdaspur bus barely days after Jagruti’s death. We know that countless other rapes occur anonymously every day with no public outcry, including the systematic brutalization of Dalit women and girls. Jagruti’s killing bought back memories of the Bhotmange mother and daughter who were gang-raped, killed and impaled with iron rods with a barbarism that received little coverage by national media, which quickly forgot that the punishment of the slaughterers was soon commuted.
Today, because of the events of the past few months, no one can deny that a woman’s safety is severely at risk in India, and has been for a long time. What is equally long-standing and alarming is our general aptitude, as a nation, for detaching ourselves in multiple ways from this reality (recent uproars notwithstanding). Our country suffers from a political, cultural, and emotional disconnect of epidemic proportions, reflected not only in our laws and practices (which have received much attention lately), but our silences and inactions, our social norms and popular culture, our public sectors and our private attitudes. It is demonstrated by the perilous tolerance of gender-based violence pervading all strata— affluent urban families who silently condone sexual abuse, khap panchayats that can allow honor killings, public officials who refuse to investigate sexual assault, influential leaders who disbelieve rape victims (we remember Park Street) or blame them publicly (including Jagruti), or an entire nation that shows no significant outrage at the growth of girl-child trafficking as one of its most lucrative, inhuman, diabolically organized crimes. In our country— where every 8 minutes a child goes missing, every 22 minutes a woman is raped, and every hour there is a dowry death— crimes against women are more neglected than any other crime. It is chilling that the majority of our young boys and girls believe that a husband is justified in beating his wife (reported by UNICEF).
Without doubt, the current focus on laws and law-enforcement is a positive outcome of Jagruti’s tragedy, but let’s not forget that our country has always showed an unsettling disconnect between what is legally permitted, and what is socially accepted and culturally projected. How else can we explain the persistence of child marriage— and the nationwide popularity of a TV series like Balika Vadhu that romanticized this regressive custom years after it was banned by law? Or the alarming rise in sex-selective abortions in most parts of our country, nearly 20 years after the PCPNDT Act was passed? Our Constitution may promise gender equality, but our dominant culture— including commercials that state that a dark-skinned girl will find neither a husband nor a job, and her father will wish he’d had a son instead— reinforce this dangerous gap between legislation and popular prejudice. And while we are relieved that a Sexual Harassment Bill has just been passed, does it mean our popular films will no longer project women as objects of desire (rather than subjects exercising autonomy), and stop glorifying heroes who relentlessly harass and stalk women?
Like the uncaring pedestrians who passed by Jagruti’s bloody body and beating heart, we all dissociate ourselves from reality and thus enable the continuance of many every-day atrocities, such as sexual harassment, child labor, or female foeticide. Our culture has an instinct to distance itself from the child on the street, the child working hazardously, the child who was raped, the child who was sold— as if she has no connection to our world. We have not prioritized raising greater human awareness to change social attitudes, as other nations have. Bangladesh’s success in protecting the girl-child, and improving its sex ratio, was hugely influenced by a simple family-planning campaign with a powerful, popular connect: “Chhele hok, meye hok, duti shontani jotheshto”— “Be it boy or girl, two are enough.” In contrast, the lack of effective outreach in our country frequently perpetuates the separation between law and conduct; often, there is no connection between what the public knows and what's happening in our legislatures. We have some progressive Acts now (e.g. the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act), but the absence of consistent awareness-building renders it impossible for the legislation to translate into greater safety for our girls and women, who are largely uninformed about the new laws and their own rights.
At the same time, it’s disconcerting that even those required by profession to know the law, such as the police or the judiciary, frequently fail to connect with or even acknowledge the trauma of victims of violence. In a Public Hearing I participated in as Jury, the police repeatedly referred to child survivors of forced sex trafficking as “girls of bad character.” I was equally horrified to read the file of a 6-year-old victim of sexual abuse, whose case was grossly mishandled at every step: by the police officer, who called it a “domestic dispute” and failed to report it; by the doctor who didn’t complete the examination, claiming the child was “refusing to cooperate”; and by the magistrate, who asked the child, “Do you want Papa to go to jail?” The case was closed. The father has regular access to the child, who continues to be in danger.
We keep asking for more female officers, but significantly, all three functionaries discussed above were women, not men. This emotional disconnect, this systemic lack of compassion, is all-pervasive. And when some of our police do prioritize gender-based violence, they are neither incentivized nor appreciated for good work— often, the contrary. When an exceptional police officer solved a high-profile rape case last year, she was summarily ‘transferred’. While we are rightfully scrutinizing police officers for under-reporting sexual assault, let’s not overlook that they are reprimanded by superiors for any increase in the number of such reports— because it “looks bad” on paper. This proclivity to “save face” by disengaging from and thus denying ground reality operates at even higher levels: recently, a Chief Minister refused to let the state’s crime records be released to the NCRB.
Because of Jagruti, rape is finally in focus as a national crisis (and for the first time, thousands of men joined women in protest). The Verma Committee Report is an impressive call to action, but the Government Ordinance in response manifests, once again, a fundamental disconnect from our most urgent problems. It disregards the Committee’s focus on a woman’s bodily integrity and autonomy, by permitting “marital rape” (and yet criminalizing consensual closeness among young people). And despite the brutalization of countless Kashmiri women, our armed forces continue to enjoy impunity for sexual crimes. The Verma Committee emphasized the State’s responsibility to deliver substantive (not merely Constitutional) justice; the Ordinance, by classifying rape and other crimes against women as isolated incidences rather than a general problem, denies State accountability as well as any obligation to provide survivor care and rehabilitation. It’s too early to know if the less than 10% increase in the 2013 "Gender Budget” (as opposed to the “10-fold” recommended by some women’s organizations), including the Nirbhaya Fund, will lead to greater safety for women, but we must, on principle and in practice, focus not only on allocations but also on accountability.
It took 10 years from the rape of 16-year-old Mathura for Indian laws to change; rape convictions dropped as soon as the outrage died down. We don’t have 10 years to put an end to our nationwide tolerance for violence against women and girls. We so easily forget that in our country, little girls like Babli Ghosh or Shanno Khan are beaten to death by their school-teachers. A 6-year-old girl in Mathura can be thrown into a fire for stepping on “upper-caste” land. Teenagers like Asha Saini are clobbered to death for choosing love over “honor.” And even as many were celebrating Valentine’s Day, 3 little girls, ages 5, 9 and 11, were raped, killed and thrown into a well in Bhandara.
Jagruti left a legacy, written in enormous pain and courage, for every girl in India. I’m glad we are protesting on the streets. That we are reviewing our laws to ensure equality, and swearing to prioritize women in our Budget. I’m glad we are demanding justice and asking that the State take responsibility, which it must. But equally, we must as a nation look ourselves in the eye and assume accountability for what happened to Jagruti, for what we have been allowing, for generations, to happen to our women and children. Each of us is answerable for our country’s dangerous denials, our own violent inactions, our inhuman indifference, and our brutal silences, for all have consequences. If we disconnect as a nation, we choose to self-destruct.
An actor, writer, and child-rights activist, Nandana Sen is Ambassador for Operation Smile, Cause Ambassador for RAHI, and UNICEF's National Celebrity for Child Protection. She divides her time between Bombay, London, and New York.
Apropos Nandana Sen’s column on gender inequality (Pass By On The Sidewalk Without Looking, Mar 25), India suffers from a political, cultural and emotional disconnect, reflected by our laws and practices, our silences and inactions. How can rules and laws ensure gender equality when our culture keeps insisting that a dark-skinned girl will find neither a husband nor a job?
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Sorry, I beg to differ with the author of this piece. "What happened to Jagruti" was the result of a near-total collapse of governance seen across much of the country( including in the nation's capital),with the various government agencies, particularly the Police, having been thoroughly corrupted and rendered useless by the virus of corruption,while our largely corrupt and hopelessly inept politicians and bureaucrats have been watching all this as mute spectators.
The rogue bus which picked up Jagruti and her boyfriend at Munirka that fateful day had neither valid licence nor permit for that trip, forget the dark-tinted glasses and numerous violations it had been involved in. And what were the constables in the many police PCR vans this criminal bus passed by doing if not their usual business of making money?
There was another case of a girl, who was kidnapped for human trafficking, who jumped from the second floor of the house in which she was captive. She jumped from there after being sodomized by one of her captors.
I salute her for the bravery of jumping from second floor after such battering. She now is in hospital bedridden due to spinal injury.
This incident happened after the jagruti/ nirbhaya case. But no media focus on the matter. Why? All cases of abuse should be brought out and given time equally in media.
Why didnt we see any rooftop photos of people surging in the streets of delhi? why always closeups of ppl in the so called masses? and above all why only in delhi?
If indeed mass mobilization had occurred in delhi, life would have been thrown out of gear. That did not happen. For the simple reason that there were no crowds.
Strategically concentrated gangs at key points in delhi, given 24 hr coverage for period of 6-8 days, in now termed as masses of people who came out for jagruti. SPectacular success of information warfare.
Make no mistake, i dont for a minute say that there was no outrage in the common man's mind. But he is as helpless in the face of Jagruti's battery as he is when government says that Vadra/ Mr Priyanka Gandhi has a right to do business in the face of more than obvious proof of swindling.
The way ms Sen waxes eloquent in this article, its as if India is only about abuse of women. The issue is abuse of helpless society by the forces in power.
The intention behind such articles as current one, is to impose a collective sense of gloom on the nation's mindset. This ties in with the unheard of foriegn focus on "India cannot progress unless it protects its women".
The issue is "India's emergence on geopolitical landscape as an unacceptable presence for the western hegemons". Hence it needs beating down via propoganda inernational and within. We have modern day Mir Jaffer's in India. Sen counts in into their tribe.
No one speaks of Atlanta, Georgia in US, where people flyin from all over the north america, to enjoy physically pre-pubescent children and flyback home during weekends.
No one speaks of Beaurette trafficking in Francophone world, where children from french colonies are trafficked to high end clientile in France.
The victim of sodomy stated earlier doesnt merit a mention. For some strange reason.
One of the positive steps that the society can take is to completely DISSOCIATE stigma of rape from the victim. A victim needs sympathy and not contempt! A society never blames a victim of pickpocket by telling HIM that the wallet was there for a taking!
Once "the blame the victim" scenario is altered, the victim's trauma may be reduced. The police can then be pressured into taking action to nab the perpetrators!
Further, Modern Males who do not mind multiple sex partners should get matured enough to treat "victim" with respect and not doubt her sexual integrity.
Unless the spociety in general and males in particular treat the Rape as an unpleasent accident maybe- just maybe - the incidents may reduce.
We in general have always been hypocrites. We have never been able to provide adequate security to women in India so instead we used our culture cloak to enumerate the merits of staying at home, not venturing out after dark, dressing 'modestly', obeying husbands and inlaws. Our 'Culture' is our last resort to cloak every shortcoming and deficiency in our system, and it has been used so cruelly against women in India. A rape is as heinous and horrible a crime as a murder, even more so, because a murder may be accidental or in self defence, but a rape is not. So till Indians reject a voyeuristic viewpoint of rape, it will continue to happen.
I discern much despair in Sen's article.ANd lotsof generalities which don't do justice to the issue.
She write: "For the Ordinance, by identifying rape and other crimes against women as isolated incidences rather than a general problem, denies State accountability as well as any obligation to provide care and rehabilitation for survivors."
My argument against this statement is: while rape is common, it still is largely an isoatd incident....in our higely overpopulated country, it happens too often I agree but is it a 'general problem?'
I do not know one single rape victim, thank the good lord....and the state is negligent on every other count...providing clean water, good air, preserving the open areas, education...taht this rehabilitation Sen talks off is a bit of a mirage...what is the point of fulminating against agovernment that seems unable to bearthe burden of its people....
"We two and our two," is a good point...and no one really knows why we are unable to enunciate a nuanced but definitve policy for this....definitely misgovernance and pusillanimity, all bad for countries.
Better policing and deep structural reforms that we are not seeing are needed. Sad but true.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT