Allegations Against Modi
The opulent Prince’s Suite at the Rambagh Palace Hotel in Jaipur was once occupied by Maharani Gayatri Devi’s son, Prince Jagat Singh. In the 21st century, though, it has been home to a controversial modern-day prince, Lalit Kumar Modi, for several days every other month for the last four years. The jetsetting industrialist, man about town and architect of the spectacularly successful Indian Premier League, whose reported fondness for the good life is matched only by his overweening ambition, didn’t just administer the Rajasthan Cricket Association (RCA) from this charmed, Rs 90,000-a-night zone of luxury. He reportedly ran Rajasthan, courtesy his proximity to the former state chief minister, Vasundhararaje.
Such was his influence that it earned Modi, 46, the sobriquet of Super Chief Minister, his role becoming a key issue in the state assembly elections last November. Chief minister Ashok Gehlot, then leading the Congress election campaign, openly accused Modi of acting as an "extra-constitutional authority". With Vasundhararaje voted out of power and Gehlot ensconced in her seat, the man who ruled Rajasthan from behind the throne, riding roughshod over civil servants and ministers, is finally facing the heat. Last month, Modi had to cool his heels for several hours at a police station here after an FIR was registered on the basis of a complaint by a Samajwadi Party activist for forgery. And to think this was the man who had once slapped a constable for walking into his box at the Sawai Mansingh Stadium (SMS) during a cricket match, triggering off a near-revolt in the city’s constabulary.
Wheeling A Deal?
Thick of things: Modi holds a meeting with officials
But even as Modi finds the going tough with his friend and patron Vasundhara in the opposition, tales of his imperious style and skills in bending the law have become the stuff of contemporary folklore here.
Modi’s friendship with Vasundhara, 56, dates back to at least 1990. A member of the then Chandra Shekhar government at the Centre recalls having seen her accompany Modi to a minister for seeking clearance to establish a factory near Gwalior. The application was in the name of his father, K.K. Modi, son of Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi. Grandfather Modi had migrated from Patiala to establish what’s now known as Modinagar in UP. "Gujarmal created employment, contributed to the wealth of the nation. What has his grandson done?" asks an industrialist politician.
Well, the grandson ruled Rajasthan. He was able to do so because all powers during the BJP’s five years of rule were apparently centralised in the chief minister’s office—everything from transfers to change in land use to liquor licences and mining leases. Decisions on these issues had Modi’s imprint. "It was a case of single window clearance," a fellow industrialist, cricket aficionado and politician told Outlook.
Coming A Copper
Locking horns: Modi and the police do not exactly have backslapping rapport
Walk into the state secretariat and this story will be whispered repeatedly, along with tales of high-handedness that has left many a bureaucrat bruised. Soon, it becomes hard to separate fact from fiction. As a senior police officer put it, "In the end, Vasundhara faced such a crisis of credibility that anything people said about her and Modi was believed."
The two most popular stories are about the public fight he had with IAS officer Mahendra Surana, and another with IPS officer R.P. Srivastava. Surana, who was secretary, employees’ welfare, recalled that in 2007 he had accompanied friend Dr Hemendra Surana, a doctor in the army and a former Ranji player, to watch a match at SMS. Dr Surana had asked Modi for passes earlier but when his request was turned down, he procured them from minister Rajendra Singh Rathore. As the two waited to gain entry, Modi came in and saw the Suranas show their passes to the girl at the door. "He simply came up, asked the girl what was happening, grabbed our passes and tore them up. The reason for his anger: he thought Dr Surana was with the Rungta group (of Kishore Rungta, rival to Modi in the RCA)." The Srivastava incident was similar.
Modi was indeed a law unto himself. Like in the case of the Amer havelis. He is alleged to have manipulated government rules and pressured local officials to secure control of at least two of the havelis, with a view to renovating and converting these into a heritage resort. Mahant Shiv Prakash Bhattacharya, the 75-year-old titleholder of the crumbling, seven-storey Choor Singh ki Haveli which stands in the shadow of the historic Amer Fort, is holding out. He has gone to court to thwart Modi’s attempt to take over his haveli.
"My ancestors were priests in Jessore (in Bangladesh). The Maharaja of Jaipur brought them here and set them up as royal priests more than 400 years ago," says the remarkably fit Bhattacharya, in his perfect Banarasi Hindi, with just the slightest touch of a harsher Rajasthani burr. "The irony is that today one Lalit Modi has hatched a conspiracy with another member of the Gwalior royalty, Vasundhara, to try and evict us." The haveli issue is now so hot in Jaipur that former vice-president Bhairon Singh Shekhawat visited the area a few days ago to express his solidarity for those displaced by Modi. The IPL czar doesn’t deny he owns these havelis, saying "it’s a small, insignificant property, which doesn’t make any difference in my life". Perhaps not, but for those who lived there, it was the only roof over their heads.
These havelis are clearly small change compared with the thousands of crores that have changed hands as Jaipur expanded to swallow agricultural land and other outlying towns. Under the cover of the controversial Section 90 B of the Land Acquisition Act, acres of agricultural land has passed into the hands of big builders from Delhi. "Section 90 B," explains an IAS officer, "was intended to be a one-time welfare measure with a cut-off date to give relief to local farmers." They were allowed to convert their land into non-agricultural land. "The area was defined, the mechanism defined," adds the IAS officer. "But it was not meant to be an enabling clause for crass commercialisation which is what it became during the BJP era, when the provision about the cut-off date was given the go-by." The Jaipur Development Authority framed ad hoc rules to get around the original objective of Section 90 B. Presiding over this change in land use, many allege, was Lalit Modi. The land issue is now the subject of a probe by the government.
BJP leaders, in fact, are so embarrassed about Modi’s role that they now all want to distance themselves from him. "Modi had nothing to do with the BJP," says state party chief Om Mathur. "If he had anything to do with the government at that time, let there be an inquiry and the truth come out. He may have been involved, may have made mistakes—it’s up to the current government to find out."
So, will we witness the fall of Lalit Modi? Perhaps not, despite all the colourful stories about him. For one, he has powerful friends in the UPA establishment—from NCP supremo Sharad Pawar to SP leader Amar Singh to superstar Shahrukh Khan, who is friendly with the junior Gandhis, not to mention Rajya Sabha MP Rajiv Shukla and several Congress MLAs in Rajasthan. Indeed, at a dinner in Jaipur last week to celebrate the return of Congress to power in Rajasthan, the subject of Lalit Modi was a conversation-buster in a gathering comprising cabinet ministers and state MPs. Caught between admiration and fear, a very senior state leader said, "There is a very thin line between love and hate." But the consensus was that there was little point in pursuing the corruption issue even though it had been an important one in the assembly elections. As one minister said, "Corruption is not really an election issue." The last word came from a young Congress leader: "There’s a Modi in every state." And all Modis, we have learnt, are known to prosper.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT