The BJP has gone over board in trying to appease you and stop you from launching a regional party. What has made you so bitter about the party that you brought to power in Karnataka ?
First, H. D. Kumaraswamy ( JDS leader who did not hand over power to B. S. Yeddyurappa as per the JDS-BJP coalition government arrangement) betrayed me. That is one type of betrayal. Then, there was the other type of betrayal. Justice Santosh Hegde made an observation which made it clear that as chief minister I did not have to resign. After the Lokayukta report of Justice Hegde, no action was initiated against any official. The only man punished was B. S. Yeddyurappa. National leaders of the BJP were merciless against me when there was not even a court verdict against me. Strictly speaking, the Lokayukta report should have gone to the Assembly and discussed. They gave the reason that they will not be able to target Sheila Dikshit, Delhi’s chief minister, on the CWG scam. Not once did anyone talk about me in Parliament. When I got relief from the Karnataka high court, they did not keep their promise of making me chief minister again. I was cheated. Nitin Gadkari had promised me and Basavaraj Bommai ( close associate of Yeddyurappa and water resources minister) that within 24 hours, I would be made state party president. Then he said, once I get relief from the high court, I can become chief minister. Even when I had the Hubli meeting, where lakhs had assembled and you are witness to it, I received so many calls from central leaders of the BJP not to take any decision. They even went to the extent that they will make the announcement on that day itself. I waited for a year. Now, I cannot even dream of going back after announcing the formation of the Karnataka Janata Paksha ( party). This is what I told Arun Jaitelyji, who I greatly respect, that I cannot go back on my decision to leave the BJP.
Why are you so bitter about the role of Ananth Kumar and L. K. Advani ?
K. S. Eshwarappa, the state BJP president, wants me to clear my name entirely in the court. He also says that I indulged in casteist politics and brought in people from outside the BJP to form the government and this damaged the image of the BJP. What kind of a circus we played to form the government in 2008 ? We were under such pressure from the central and state party leaders to form the government by hook or by crook. After all this, Advaniji even said that he will not come to Parliament if Yeddyurappa does not resign from the chief ministership. So, I had to resign.
Do you feel discriminated against in the BJP ? Do you feel there are two sets of rules in the BJP— one for Nitin Gadkari and another for leaders like you and Vasundhara Raje and Narender Modi ?
What is the role of the RSS in this politics of discrimination ? Do you think the RSS favours those who belong to one caste so they can remain in power ? Like Gadkari can but not you.
From Kalyan Singh, Vaghela, Madanlal Khurana, to Vasundhara Raje, Gopinath Munde, Narender Modi —nobody is happy. Discrimination is evident. Ondu kannu sunna, ondu kannu benne (They deceive as easily as they promise). RSS is not interfering. They have left it to the party. Advani has a one point programme to make Ananth Kumar chief minister. They thought Ananth Kumar will automatically become chief minister after me. But, then I made Sadananda Gowda and Jagdish Shettar chief ministers.
Have you, at any point of time, discussed the politics of discrimination in the context of caste with other leaders in the BJP like Vasundhara Raje or Narender Modi ?
Nobody speaks. Nobody is happy. They are all keeping quiet. But, I am in touch with all leaders, Gopinath Mundeji, Vasundharaji and others. Not Modi.
Have you discussed splitting of the party with your counterparts ?
No, we have not spoken about it.
You have had some discussions with some leaders of the Congress party. What are the signals you are getting from them ? And, what kind of a caste axis are you trying to form to thwart the charge that yours will be a purely Lingayat party ?
No. I am not in contact with any of the Congress leaders. But, I am getting tremendous response from the people. In fact, I would say that I am getting more response now than when I went to them when Kumaraswamy betrayed me. All sections of people, including backward classes, scheduled castes and tribes and minorities are coming in large numbers to meet me. You know, the interesting part is nobody has said that I should remain in the BJP. Everyone, particularly the minorities, are saying that I should not go back on my decision to form the Karnataka Janata Paksha. Today, people are not getting the benefits of the schemes and programmes that I introduced. This is the era of regional parties. West Bengal, Bihar, Punjab and other states. Whether it is the Congress or the BJP, the strength of the national parties is depleting. Karnataka is best suited for a regional party. And, regional parties are able to get a lot more from the Centre. Even Chandrababu Babu of the TDP got so much during the NDA regime at the Centre.
A shorter, edited version of this appears in print
The old Yeddy (‘Nobody in the BJP is happy...’, Nov 26) has become honourable, sir, your excellency as soon as news is out he’s quitting the BJP. Great show, guys.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
“All that I could make out of the vague statement of Yediyurappa that ‘NOBODY In The BJP Is Happy’ is that he has renamed himself from Yedu to ‘Dr. NO’.”
The Old Yeddy has become Honorable, Sir, Yours Excellency Yediyurappa the majesty, when he is quitting BJP!!!! Great show Media!
Not enough money in the BJP.
The Congress might tolerate some more corruption as long as he is with them on the 'anti-male reservation formula'.
The whole idea is, even if there is a national executive, the executive acts in the singular. The B. J. P. does see Ms. Sonia Gandhi as the undisputed leader of the Congress, and the B. J. P. national executive acts like they perceive Ms. Gandhi to act, and they feel it is not apart from normal while the Congress might be acting apart from normal. Mr. Yediyurappa was seen to be democratic in Karnataka, and the B. J. P. national executive might appreciate, that he was seen as perhaps a leader not to be asked to be merely a figurehead. He did have the two members in his cabinet who were perceived to be corrupt in the mining affairs of Bellary. The general perception in Karnataka was, that he is good for the state. It seems to be a situation, untractable. The gentleman must be trying to fathom, why he is regarded as a well meaning person, and why he entered the political arena.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT