It isn’t every year that the president of the most powerful country comes calling on India. In fact, till a decade ago, most presidents of the United States of America didn’t think India even deserved a stopover on their forays into Asia. Then, in 2000, Bill Clinton landed in New Delhi to charm the Indians and create a new mould for Indo-US relations, followed six years later by George W. Bush, who was rated as the best American president for India. In case you think the media should have become accustomed to the visit of American leaders, and are surprised at the buzz over Barack Obama’s forthcoming visit to this land of Mahatma Gandhi (whom the American president considers an exemplary leader), then you have quite obviously missed the point: he is the first US president to visit this country in the first half of his first term in office. That by itself is a testimony to the importance of India in the global arena, its gradual rise as a power, its relevance to the superpower that’s said to be on a possible decline.
Chinese warship fires missile in South China Sea
A Look At The Presidential To-Do
Nov 6, Mumbai
Nov 7, Mumbai
Nov 7, Delhi
Nov 8, Delhi
Nov 9, Depart
But then China began flexing its muscle, exploiting the economic crisis to surpass Japan as the world’s second-largest economy and then staking unilateral claims over South China Sea and other islands in East and Southeast Asia. The other countries of the region, mostly close allies of the US, were not only alarmed but wondered whether the US was deliberately forsaking its role of a stabiliser in the Asia-Pacific and allowing China to carve its sphere of influence there.
Courting India: Obama with Indian-origin Americans at an event.
Agrees Arvind Subramanian, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, “This is a serious issue. The overall climate for openness in the US is not great, especially for issues such as outsourcing. The fact that Indian companies contribute to the US economy helps but it does not fundamentally alter whether or not the US is inclined to take protectionist action.”
Eastern Manoeuvres: Obama with the Indian premier at the White House
Amidst fervent attempts to woo business in Mumbai, American sources say Obama will be provided a glimpse of India’s progress in e-governance and panchayati raj. He’s likely to be hooked live to a chaupal in session. Why isn’t the media abuzz with speculation about a big-ticket deal? Partly, officials say, this is deliberate, aimed at lowering expectations to avoid disappointment. But the more significant reason is that a big-ticket idea can’t be floated every time Indian and American leaders meet, that the nuclear deal was a game-changer and the gains have to be now consolidated, and that the thrust now is to have India and the US enter into global partnership.
Wives Inc Michelle Obama with Gursharan Kaur in Washington
Ultimately, as the US plans to create space for India to play a global role, New Delhi shouldn’t forget that it can’t expect others to hold its hand to glory. India will have to understand America’s compulsions in Afghanistan, and seize upon other opportunities to raise its profile as a great nation that’s devoid of hunger and believes in progress for all.
Barack Obama has to delicately balance his diplomacy between China, India and Pakistan (Namaste India, Nov 8). China’s growing ambition is reflected in its unilateral claims over South China Sea, islands in the East and India’s Arunachal Pradesh. However, the US is in sore need of China to broker deals with ‘rogue’ states like Iran and North Korea. Pakistan is in the reckoning if for nothing else then for fighting terror and for engineering America’s safe exit from Afghanistan. India is the only stable democracy in the region providing opportunities for trade and investment. So, India need not shy away from extracting concessions from Obama like lifting of controls on access to dual technology, a permanent seat in the unsc or sounding a warning to Islamabad to stop exporting terror to India.
Kangayam R. Narasimhan, Adyar
For some reason, the Democrats have a reserved approach towards India (it never goes beyond the regular rhetoric) compared to the Republicans. It has been so at least for the last five decades. Will Obama reverse it?
India should for once be smart and grab this chance of increasing trade and presence in the world. But there is a good chance that we’ll make a mess of it. The socialist guilt inside us can suddenly spring up and start sloganeering against mnc ‘exploiters’ and capitalism in general. Never mind that Communist China has no problem in getting trillion-dollar American investments and exporting 1,000-billion dollar worth of goods to the US. Or that Pakistanis may keep decrying all values American, but its government has no issues in grabbing all aid possible. It’s time India too started being selfish about its interests and stopped pretending we are the world’s conscience against the US.
There is no reason for us to bend over backwards to accommodate US interests just because their president is visiting us. India is the second-largest consumer of American goods and it’s time Indian leaders used this to bargain for our own interests.
S.P. Sharma, Mumbai
One can only hope that Barack Obama’s ‘Namaste India’ does not become a ‘Nemesis for India’ post his visit.
Rajneesh Batra, New Delhi
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
This is USA Inc. and Mr President is equal to top 15 US companies in US.The whole purpose of meeting Asian countries is that the USA Inc. is no where left to go to keep the business running. Also what people staying in US want is to keep Business profitable so that Job cuts are avoided. Its the Top priority.That is the single most important reason of the visit.
No doubt this is the best time to get long term benefits from US to India. I think the India government also will have a plan in mind and act accordingly. Since US is no longer as powerful as it was in 90s , INDIA can force US now to bend some policies.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT