It's no surprise then that Elite's brightest stars, its two highest-paid models—Vipasha Agarwal and Lisa Haydon—both have a darker complexion than the light-eyed, ivory-skinned Aishwarya wannabes that ad campaigns have traditionally favoured. Vipasha, who comes from Varanasi, has a crammed portfolio that includes one Bollywood film (I See You, starring Arjun Rampal), has been voted the New Face of Lakme in 2007, and is endorsing megabrands like Garnier and—ironically—Hindustan Lever's Fair & Lovely. Lisa's chart is full too. The Mumbai-based model made her debut at the Wills Lifestyle India Fashion Week 2007 as one of the ten 'New Faces Going Places', and currently hosts her own TV show—Babelicious on Zee Trends—besides lending her face to Seagram's and Elle. "It's about time fashion and advertising woke up to real life," says Lisa. "I hate this constant classification of 'dusky' and 'fair'. I don't think it's an issue anymore. These days, it's more about how much personality you exude, your ability to inspire, your allure."The language of advertising too has changed, with the emphasis in skincare brands shifting from 'white' and 'fair' to more acceptable terms like 'clear radiance' and 'glow'. "The idea is to talk about healthy-looking skin, irrespective of dark or light, without stoking women's insecurities," says Malvika Mehra, creative head, O&M, Bangalore.But the ad industry wasn't alone in its pursuit of fairness all these years. In Bollywood, despite the fact that pale-skinned leading ladies like Aishwarya Rai, Katrina Kaif and Kareena Kapoor are still placed higher on the totem pole, a few headline acts like Bipasha Basu, Deepika Padukone and Konkona Sen Sharma are helping the tide turn.
Dark luminiscence: Lakshmi Menon (top), Monikangana Dutta (above) are the current ramp-scorchers
Luckily, when it comes to the catwalk, Indian fashion hasn't experienced a complete whiteout. "It's partly because the West has always held a fascination for the exotic look," explains designer Ashish Soni. "And also because designers realise that in a sun-drenched country like ours, it's impossible for pale women to show off their clothes to maximum benefit." By happy coincidence, the season's most talked-about ramp-scorchers—Monikangana Dutta and Lakshmi Menon—are both several shades darker than the models we're used to seeing on our runways. This year, Assam-born Monikangana was handpicked by scouts from international model coordinating powerhouse IMG as one of two Indian models it wanted to project globally. (Vipasha was the other.) The ravishing Lakshmi Menon has turned into something of a fashion deity abroad after endorsing the French luxury brand Hermes for their Spring-Summer 2008 collection and walking the ramp for Jean Paul Gaultier, Stella McCartney and Issey Miyake.It helps the Indian models' cause that western fashion houses, buoyed by what is being labelled the 'Obama effect', are seeking African-American and Asian models to lend more diversity and colour to their cast. The glam circuit this month is abuzz with talk centred on global style bible Vogue Italia's bold 'All Black' issue that bemoans the lack of black models on global catwalks, even going so far as to label it discriminatory.Is this to say that the outlook, not skin, has turned fair? Not quite. Skin lighteners are still the largest-growing segment within cosmetic companies in India, and their robust annual growth forecast of 10-15 per cent suggests that it will take several decades to rid small-town (and metro) India of its deep-seated colour bias. Yet industry insiders like Puri hope that the acceptance of darker-skinned women will percolate down to the masses. "We're already seeing a distinct change in attitude in urban centres; so it's only a matter of time before smaller towns follow suit. What's also important is that the male mentality is changing. Men are beginning to realise that beauty and fairness aren't interchangeable."In the end, whether it's films, fashion or advertising—each of these industries is market-driven. It's only when consumers give the thumbs up to products and movies featuring dusky models and stars that 'dark' will be a fair deal.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT