Yet it happened. As a player, I called the selectors a bunch of jokers but who shall I blame now? Isn’t the BCCI a bunch of double jokers and why on earth am I a victim once more? Am I being blamed for the England and Australia Test disasters now? A BCCI source told me that some of the big brass did not like my commentary style and expert comments. They felt I looked too “sleepy”. That’s bullshit. It’s not my fault that I looked ‘sleepy’ all the time, even while taking guard at the crease or bending down to field the ball during my playing days. At least I did not jump about or indulge in jack-in-the-box activities, sniff all the time, look at the sun or talk to myself as Srikkanth did. And anyway, who was the Man of the Match twice running in the semi-final and final of the 1983 World Cup?
Of course, in this BCCI set-up, I could never hope to be chairman of selectors. I did not yack-yack-yack all the time on subjects I know nothing about, there were no conflicts of interest like doing commentary, being associated with an IPL team or promoting a son at the national level. Without all these qualifications, how could they continue with me in the selection committee?
Well, Sandeep Patil is the BCCI choice for chairman and they know what they are doing here. He used to be a glamour boy and even played hero in a film, Kabhi Ajnabi Thhe. Sandeep was always on a higher level, you knew how much he disdained fielding, to the extent of not bothering to bend to pick up the ball up or even chasing it. But I agree he could really hammer the bowling in a manner I could never do, though this happened only once every 100 innings.
Coming to Roger Binny, he always did well as a player and will be an asset. As for the others, I’m sure Sandeep will inspire them to rise to great histrionic heights and deliver one box-office hit after another. As for me, let me brush up on some ‘shayari’ which I can drone out from the experts corner. Curing insomnia is more important than selecting a national team which never wins anything.
The Mumbai-based satirist is the creator of ‘Trishanku’; E-mail your secret diarist: vgangadhar70 AT gmail.com
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
It`s indeed a very sorry state of affairs that has been happening with veteran cricketer-Mohinder Amarnath . His contribution to Indian Cricket can hardly be forgotten and can hardly be ignored either. It`s in fact his luck that has not been favouring him despite his talents, the same way ,as it has not been, the Indian cricket team . It is perhaps his tongue at times, also proves to be bit rude and his speaking a plain truth distances him from Cricket authorities/Board etc. . At the same time, it`s a new,quite an advance era, we are passing through where one`s body language does also count , no matter how skillful ,intelligent or good commentator he is . Sanjay Manzrekar is also one of the examples in his line.
Any way ,one must belive in saying - Every dog has it`s day. Mohinder Amarnth shall also be back again with full shine of his luck.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT