Et tu Cardoz? Did you ever eat the semolina custard when your mother made it? Admit it, the only reason for leaving the motherland in the first place was to avoid a dish that makes the word lumpen sound tasty. Or one whose grainy character can only be compared to the lumps of postal office paste that postal department clerks leave for their customers to smear with dirty fingers on to money orders and the flaps of grey inland letter forms.
Yes, yes, there are many sub-sects amongst the Indian population who will claim that the upma is their favourite dish. It’s possible that civil society, even as it positions itself as the voice of the ‘volk’, will table its demands to make it the Indian national dish and insist that the prime minister be served upma for breakfast every day. They may even now be planning to band together and have a sit-in on the grounds outside Parliament, stirring huge cauldrons of humble upma as the food of the masses. One that will unify the country on a common platform of nutritious pap as various expert cooks and bawarchis create the ultimate upma.
Therein lies the rub. There’s no clear consensus on what makes for the ideal upma. Schoolboys and girls know that an upma in the tiffin box is the last recourse of the harassed Mum. “Eeea-ow, upma!” is how they respond when they open their aluminium or plastic boxes and peer into the congealed mass lurking at the bottom. Sometimes it has the texture of reconstituted thermocol, at other times the fragrance of a lumpy mattress that has been left out in the rain. For some it is the smell, or should one say aroma, that is distracting. It’s got an earthy quality to it thanks to the tiny insects and boll weevils lurking in the sooji.
Needless to say, in the hands of an expert chef all this falls into place. If Cardoz doused his upma with generous helpings of white wine, chicken stock, white port, coconut milk, oyster mushrooms and then disguised it altogether by calling it ‘Wild Mushroom Polenta’, he was only following a time-honoured tradition of value addition to a traditional peasant dish. Udipi-style cooks prefer to add generous helpings of ghee so that their upma gets a golden glaze. They pack the melting mixture into small moulds and upend them onto slivers of banana leaf, with a circle of tomato on the top.
As an adult you don’t eat the pure stuff, you have it in the form of various disguises, Kara Baath for instance, where the upma comes as a spicy combo that is more of a veggie biriyani, with all manner of additives, or made from other wheat- or rice-based derivatives such as vermicelli, broken wheat, beaten rice flakes, sago pearls, rice rava, oats and so forth.
On the other hand, there are individuals who refuse to be fooled. My father, for instance, was a lifelong member of the anti-upma brigade. He was not a musical man but he would start humming a little tune when the upma appeared on the table. He whistled under his breath: “Why oh why, did I come to Ohio?” as he gazed at the upma on his plate.
My mother would start stabbing at her plate as he proceeded to ask for a banana, then a spoonful of sugar, a helping of pickle, whichever variety that was not in season, and finally, he would look up at all of us and say: “Can I have some jam? A little marmalade might be a good idea to go with my upma.”
My mother would have stabbed her way through a whole mound of the upma by then. None of us would have touched the stuff. You could slice the air with a bread knife.
“I never said that I would not eat the upma,” my father would say under his breath. But we knew that he was whistling, “I’m so glad I’m going to Ohio!”
No wonder Americans have risen to the challenge and shouted. “Up-mom! Yes we can.”
Hope Geeta Doctor has written this essay in a lighter vein (Lumpy Proletariat Strikes, July 11)! Upma is a superb dish if one knows how to prepare it.
R.V. Subramanian, Gurgaon
Ms Doctor’s childhood experience seems to have put her off upma so totally that she has never eaten anything called upma again. That would explain why the image she creates is so far from the real thing. What a pity.
B.V. Raghavan, Gurgaon
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
[If Cardoz doused his upma with generous helpings of white wine, chicken stock, white port, coconut milk, oyster mushrooms...]
Hope Ms Geeta Doctor has written this essay in a lighter vein!
Its a super dish if one knows how to prepare it.
@Subramanian - I think she has tried to be funny, but it turned out a bit flippant; just like when you try to make upma and end up making that "lumpy, congealed thing" staring at you from the bottom of the tiffin-box. Ms. Doctor's childhood experience seems to have put her off upma so totally that she never ate anything named upma again. That will explain the image she creates is so far away from real upma. What a pity.
Nothing is safe in America including good old upma.You ought to see what they have made of yoga.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT