Yes, India is the world’s biggest baby-making factory—and in a slightly different way than you might have thought. The operative word is ‘factory’. People come here with hope from Luxembourg to Saudi Arabia, Tanzania to Thailand, from the US to Uzbekistan. There are IVF clinics all over the country, in the metros, big cities, even the smaller towns. Couples from the US and Europe have been coming for cheap ART treatment—of which IVF, or in vitro fertilisation, is one method—for a while now. The new spurt is from Islamic countries and Africa. “I got the first cases from Afghanistan in 2006. I used to get one or two cases a month at the time. Now, between October and April, I see an average of 50 new patients from Afghanistan in a month. Many patients come from Iraq and Iran too,” says Dr Dhawan Bajaj. Infertility is seen as a curse in many Islamic societies. Since these countries hardly have any ART clinics, people of all classes—shopkeepers and teachers, businessmen and daily-wagers—come to the numerous clinics in the lanes and bylanes of Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Bangalore.
Seeking joy African patients at Dr Malapani’s clinic in Mumbai. (Photograph by Apoorva Salkade)
Why is India the latest flavour in fertility tourism? One reason is numbers. Dr Rashmi Sharma, a consultant with the IVF department at Moolchand Hospital, says a recent study showed there are over 500 ART clinics across the land. And India offers a wide range of services, such as artificial insemination by sperm from a husband or donor, in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (IVF-ET), gamete intra-fallopian transfer (GIFT), donor egg and embryo treatment, sperm injection (ICSI) and endoscopic diagnosis as well as the use of surrogate mothers. “Hospitals and doctors are also more transparent about the process and we give couples counselling before the treatment,” says Dr Sharma. In the UK, Israel, Australia, France and Denmark, it’s getting increasingly difficult to meet the demand for donor eggs; India is a natural alternative. Relaxed laws regarding third-party reproduction and the easy availability of surrogates also allow for treatment procedures that are banned in many countries. Above all, the popularity of India seems to rest on the skill of our doctors and the facilities available. “Why shouldn’t they come to us? We have the latest equipment and a level of skill unmatched by doctors in any other country. I have an embryoscope, the first in Asia, which I use to observe embryos without exposing them to the laboratory air and select only the healthy ones. I have freezing containers to preserve the embryos for the next treatment cycle. I do around 1,000 embryo implants in a year,” says Dr Hrishikesh Pai, head of the IVF department at Lilavati hospital, Mumbai.
The treatment doesn’t come cheap. An IVF cycle here can cost Rs 1.5-2 lakh; other overheads, such as housing and food, can add hugely to the cost. One IVF cycle takes about seven months to show if the mother has conceived and many couples have to go through more than one cycle. Ahmed Sareed, 34, whose wife Noori conceived after two cycles, spent seven and a half months in India. They shelled out over Rs 2,000 per day for rent, living in the Afghani refugee-dominated Lajpat Nagar area in the capital. But India is still far more cost-effective than many other countries.
Dr Kaberi Banerjee, who sees about 100 patients from Muslim countries, says that while patients may be rich or poor, the causes of infertility are distressingly similar. “Male infertility is far more common—around 60 per cent of the cases—and it is usually because of drug addiction, war-related stress. These either lower the sperm count or result in impotency. In some cases, it’s because of war wounds. With women it is usually genital tuberculosis,” she says.
Dr Sharma says patients from Muslim countries seem more desperate to have children. “I have seen a man walk in with four wives but no children. The first option, if the first wife does not bear a child, is to remarry without ascertaining if the cause is male infertility. In African countries, they are not as shattered about being childless but want to conceive.” But the taboos are the same. Morry Nyondo, from Tanzania, says women in her town often go to fertility clinics alone, as they think the problem lies with them. “A recent scientific study done in Tanzania revealed that 40 per cent of Tanzanian men are infertile. But the questions about childlessness are directed only at the woman. In Tanzania, they only do hormonal treatments. None of these assisted conception procedures are performed because they are taboo,” she says.
Morry and her husband Kassy now have an IVF baby. But they found the whole business still very unorganised. “First, our doctor came four days later than expected, and then said that we had to undergo a part of the treatment, travel back home and then return to Mumbai. Every additional day meant hundreds of dollars wasted as we are both employed. Also, we had to ask for leave without pay and fake the reasons for travel due to confidentiality issues.”
Many African patients also struggle to get visa renewals as the IVF treatment can be prolonged. “These patients often ask me to give written confirmation that they are here for treatment so that they can extend their stay,” says Dr Anoop Gupta, who runs a clinic in Delhi. This is where agents and medical tourism companies come into the picture. “Africans have to undergo FRRO procedure, which means they have to register themselves within 14 days of arrival. This is because in the past there have been instances of smugglers using the medical visa to gain entry and sell narcotics. “But the red tape bothers genuine patients, so we help them cut loose from it and provide services that makes their stay comfortable,” says P.R. Ramesh, Morry’s agent in Mumbai.
Agents also provide translators or guides, arrange visas, book tickets, arrange clinical appointments, food and stay. Ramesh sees infertile couples from 31 countries visiting India for treatment. Almost all big hospital chains offer ART treatment and the number of private clinics is growing by the day. Dr D. Mahendran, managing director of Care Medical Tourism, based in Chennai, says that fertility tourists often prefer stand-alone clinics to hospitals. “They rely on us to select a doctor and a good embryologist. They fly in for two weeks for the treatment and then fly back to cut costs.”
Comfortable space Many Afghan couples have found solace at ART clinics in Delhi. (Photograph by Jitender Gupta)
Dr Anjali Malapani, who runs a popular infertility clinic in Colaba with her husband Anirudha, says about 60 per cent of her clients are from foreign countries. Many of her patients are 38 years or older and have tried IVF treatment before. “So they insist on us implanting more than three embryos per cycle to improve their chances of pregnancy—a procedure that is banned in many foreign countries.” She has also successfully steered patients away from expensive surrogacy procedures by providing healthy donor eggs. “Childlessness is a huge stigma and often patients don’t tell anyone but their closest relatives about why they are coming to India,” says Dr Malapani.
Patients of Indian Origin Harris Mohan and wife Jeevantee at a Chennai clinic. (Photograph by R.A. Chandroo)
However, even though business is booming, the number of such clinics—about 500—is small compared to the 28,000 gynaecologists we have. The reason is ART is not taught at medical colleges; only the Sikkim-Manipal University, Karnataka, offers a course, an MSc in clinical embryology, started in 2005.
Most experts in the field are self-trained, or have attended workshops or training sessions in India and abroad. “This is why so many IVF clinics open and shut down so quickly,” says Dr Malapani, who has been running her clinic since 1997. “Many gynaecologists think this is a lucrative business. But it is also result-oriented. When things don’t work out and they have a zero per cent success rate, the clinics shut down.” The Indian Council of Medical Research has taken the first steps to regularise such clinics in India by starting a registry to track them and the patients taking such treatments.
Despite the ad hoc nature of the practice in India, foreign patients keep coming because doctors seem to excel in dishing out the “personal touch”, for many such clinics are run by husband-wife teams. “Many of my African patients keep in touch with me via e-mail, right through the pregnancy and final birth, because we bond while they are here. Similarly, I’ve started speaking a little Arabic to make my Middle East patients more comfortable,” says Dr Rishma Pai, also a consultant fertility specialist at Lilavati and Jaslok hospital in Mumbai. The “borderless babies”—usually born in their parents’ home country—might never visit India but for their parents, India remains the place where prayers were answered.
By Smita Mitra with Akhila Krishnamurthy in Chennai
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Dr. Surbhi Gupta is a well-known Gynaecologist as well as an IVF and Surrogacy Specialist in Delhi India. Heads a team of IVF treatment experts at Urogyn Delhi : The treatment of Infertility is a complex branch of medical science that is best handled by experts.
This is very ince information about ivf treatment in delhi by Dr. Archana Dhawan bajaj.
It'a my personal experience that Dr. Archana Dhawan Bajaj is one of the best IVF specialist in Delhi(India).
For many years it was only a dream for me to have a baby. In my dreams, sometime, I was in Europ and sometime in America finding treatment for my wife and myself to have a baby. I happend to fly to Delhi for a personal tour with my wife. Unexpectdly I found contact of Dr. Archana Dahwan Bajaj and got the treatment to have baby. We are surprised to see our longging and dreams came through. In fact, God had asked us through his angel of mercy and blessing (Dr. Archana D. Bajaj) to fly to Delhi to face our years longging and desire miracale. If I write a novel on the talents, skills, and generosity of Dr. Arachan, yet it will be a drop in river. May God give all his blessing to Dr. Archana and her team to make the dreams of needy family come true.
The important point is to register these clinics and bring it under scanner because very soon quacks may begin to dupe the hopeful couples.
The chances of pregnancy through IVF and other methods are very high but not 100%.
The medical treatment with highly qualified doctors is the biggest plus point for India. Anyone who had spent some years in a foreign country like Gulf, or USA, UK would immediately acknowledge this.
If a person is under high psychological pressure the first casualty is his sexual performance. But sexual performance has nothing to do with fertility. This pressure on mind of a parent leads to second level problems and that is the lack of motility of sperm, which is generally called as "sperm count". If the motile sperms (those which can swim with their tails) are less than 60%, it is low count but not problematic unless it is less than 50%.
All over the world, including India, sperm count (not motile sperms) is decreasing. Even just a decade ago the average observed was 20 million sperms per milliliter (ml) of semen. Now the standards are reduced to 15 million. Every year this number is reduced by about 2%!!! .
God's creation so mysterious that sex ratio maintenance (actual rate is 50% female vs. 50% male) is still unknown to science. Somehow female child ratio is maintained by nature's law to continue this universe. Any sexual preference is thus against not only the law of that land but against the universe itself. We should feel happy that with all this IVF and other multiple methods, science has no way to pre-determine and control the sex of the child.
Ayurveda says that any type of suppression of body needs due to obsessions of the mind may lead to less sperm motility. So, Ayurveda advises men and woman at productive stage to listen to their body needs. If body wants more water, liquids, juices for example you should satisfy that "urge" of the body. Same is true about constipation, insomnia and other problems
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT