Taking to the field after a KKR match. (Photograph by Getty Images, From Outlook 17 December 2012)
Fifteen-year-old Aryan (currently studying at the Dhirubhai Ambani International School in Mumbai) is set to join Sevenoaks School in London in September, and doting father Shah Rukh wants to spend as much time as he can with his “best friend”. “My kids are genuinely my best friends. The relationship I share with them is so clear that we can say anything to any one,” he says. In the next moment, he says wishfully, “I will miss the security of him just being around. While I do feel like a protector to them, I also feel a sense of security when they are around.” Letting go of Aryan (to whom the superstar dedicated his ambitious superhero film Ra.One) hasn’t been easy, but Shah Rukh has his reasons.“I don’t want my children to be subjected to a lot of talk that is untrue about the way I lead my life. I want them to be away from this. I want them to be in a world that is not surrounded by rubbish tabloid reports. It will do them good and that is one aspect of it,” he says. Secondly, he wants his children to get educated and pursue their own dreams instead of getting comfortably settled in the film industry. “I feel they should become whatever they want to. My son wants to play for Manchester United and my daughter wants to learn ballet. I don’t know what they will be, but I want them to be educated beyond films. I feel they should see the world, form their own opinions without being shadowed by the opinions of my work and my space.” Once Aryan joins boarding school in London, the star says he will miss his daily ritual of knocking on his son’s bedroom and seeing him lolling around. “It’s a little sad for me but it’s better for them. It’s one of the prices you pay for being famous,” he says ruefully. While Aryan is going to soak in the new experiences awaiting him in the school, Shah Rukh hopes to make frequent flying visits. “I’m very clearly decided that if I feel like seeing him, I will fly down. I’m star enough to cancel some work and pay a visit to my son,” he says, smiling.
Aryan’s New School
Sevenoaks, founded in 1432, is situated in a 100-acre campus outside London. A co-educational day and boarding school for pupils, between 11 and 18 years, it’s wellknown for its top GCSE and IB results. Aryan could bunk with roommates, but the boarding home for boys also boasts kitchenettes, tennis courts and gardens. Actor Daniel Day-Lewis is among the institution’s famous alumni.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Looks like paid advertisement for SRK...
Maybe Rajan Rahejas need SRK as their brand ambassador ?
Very unusual for a son to be so pampered by a parent in this century.
Its usually the daughter who gets the pampering.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT