Hear a Congressman right now and it would seem that the Election Commission has only to announce the dates for assembly elections in April-May and the BJP leaders would be sitting in the Opposition benches—with the JD(S) by its erstwhile coalition partner’s side. After all, the Congress has won JD(S) leader H.D. Kumaraswamy’s base, the Ramanagaram town municipality. And the BJP, despite being in power, has lost out in urban areas, very much its base.
There are enough statistics to sustain Congress euphoria. The party has won nearly 40 per cent of the votes as against the BJP’s 18.29 per cent and a similar number for the JD(S). In terms of seats, the BJP and JD(S)—905 seats each—put together cannot match up to Congress’s 1,960 seats out of the 4,952 seats for which elections were held. The BJP’s spoiler-in-chief, B.S. Yediyurappa’s two-month-old KJP, secured just 274 seats or 5.5 per cent of the votes. In terms of city corporations (other than Bangalore for which elections are due later), the Congress won three. In the remaining four, the BJP needs the support of others to gain control of at least three.
So, is Madhusudan Mistry, the AICC observer for Karnataka, flying high? “Flying? No, sir. He’s in seventh heaven,” says an important party functionary from Delhi. A senior leader, however, sounds a note of caution: “Those gloating do not know the ground realities in Karnataka. These results are not a tunnel view of victory in the assembly elections.”
There is reason for his curt comment. If you compare the latest figures with previous ulb poll results, the Congress gain does not come across as that spectacular. In 2007, it secured 32 per cent of the votes (1,606 seats) followed by the JD(S) at 30 per cent (1,502 seats) and the BJP at 23.08 per cent (1,180 seats). Today, the BJP as a divided force has not lost much if the latest figures of the BJP, KJP and mining baron B. Sreeramulu’s BSR Congress are added up; JD(S) has lost some 500-odd seats.
But that performance did not help the Congress win the 2008 assembly polls. And though the individual fortunes of the BJP, KJP and JD(S) may currently be low, they cannot be dismissed outright. If anything, they stand warned. The bjp’s biggest losses have come in the coastal belt. The moderate Hindu voter has obviously reacted strongly to the region being turned into a laboratory for “the Hindu Taliban”. This is besides the division within the party and a major caste group like the Lingayats shifting votes, giving the Congress its biggest boost in more than a decade. In Udupi, make that four decades, for it’s had a right-wing tilt since the Jana Sangh days. In several other parts of the state, Yediyurappa has played the spoiler. Rather glaringly so in north Karnataka and in the Hyderabad-Karnataka region where the Congress failed to take advantage of its decision to grant the region special status under Article 371. The JD(S), on the other hand, may have secured less number of seats, but it has held its own in the Old Mysore region.
The ulb results are indeed a reflection of the popular mood two months ahead of the assembly polls. But they do not portend any Congress wave. In fact, the dilemma before Congressmen is their inability to communicate their problems to the high command, despite an AICC observer in the state. “Yes, Mistry is there. But he listens only to either the KPCC chief or the legislature party leader,” says a Congress leader from north Karnataka. Is that why there was a demand for his replacement at the Davanagere meeting Rahul Gandhi addressed in 2012? “Do we need to elaborate,” he asks. And who can replace Mistry? “Ghulam Nabi Azad understands all of us very well....”
Indeed, Ghulam Nabi knows the various pressure groups within the party and how to handle egos. He has done so before and many a time. Sadly, however, Rahul did not do anything about the protests at Davanagere; Mistry became part of his inner circle. So much for inner party democracy. Perhaps the party vice-president should heed his own words at Davanagere: “Only the Congress can defeat the Congress.”
By Imran Qureshi in Bangalore
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Karnataka has a great track record of voting at state level a party that sits in opposition in LS..
Karnataka chose CONGRESS to rule the state in 1977, 1989 and 1999..
They chose BJP in 2009, chose JD in 1983/1985, 1994..
And this state always votes differently in State elections and LS elections..
Thus in 1985, the voted for CONgress at national level and chose JD in state elections.
So, those calling for demise of BJP in these urban body polls are simply doing paid journalism without any purpose.
Dont waste time.. the CON party is not going to get a third stint @ Delhi through your low quality journalism. Spend time on better things - like speculating how the Sangh parivar caused World war 2, or how Modi is behind the recent meteor collision in Ural region of Russia (that hurt many thousand russians).
Better luck !!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT