The BCCI wants him in India, but where has Modi been?
In the days leading to, and after, his very ceremonious exit—moments after the final of IPL-3 in the last week of April—Lalit Modi, playing very much the injured innocent, breathed fire. He quoted the Bhagwad Gita, invoked the spirit of justice, and promised a fight. The truth will out, he cried. “Wait for the IPL to finish—I will reveal the men who have tried to bring disrepute to the game and how we stopped them from doing it,” he wrote.
But the fight he’d promised, in the interest of ‘truth’ and to get reinstated as IPL commissioner, has petered out. Instead, replying to the showcause notices by the BCCI, his lawyers launched an avalanche of papers, hitting the BCCI with documents running to 15,000 pages (borne on a trolley). “The team may have added more,” he noted, with obvious glee, on his Twitter feed.
Topsy turvy Lalit Modi lives it up in Monaco, where Vijay Mallya and son has fun with him in their yacht
Then, quietly folding his tents, Modi disappeared from India. He has resurfaced in all sorts of happening places in Europe and Africa. Partying aboard Vijay Mallya’s yacht off Monaco and Sardinia, for instance; having the pleasure of being suspended upside down by Mallya and his son, the photo of this event being shared online. Holidaying in Italy. Off to the football World Cup in South Africa, with a safari thrown in to boot. Then, “to my good friend Ravi ruia new yatch” (Modi’s spellings). A beer with Kevin Pietersen, visits to film shoots in London. And now to Bali for yet another holiday.
All over the place, then, except India, where he is being summoned to appear before the BCCI disciplinary committee looking into the allegations of gross misuse of power and misappropriation of funds against him, and where the taxman is keen on another chat with him.
Intelligence agencies have reportedly admitted that Modi is under threat from elements in the underworld, but the reasons have been undisclosed. Thus, while gallivanting around despite security threats, he’s been given an exemption from personal appearance before the disciplinary committee. Surely, the threat of the law seems to be a greater deterrent, according to a source familiar with developments in the Modi camp: “Modi is aware that the dice is loaded against him. He knows that the BCCI is united against him, and the government doesn’t like him. He knows that if the government wants to, it can make things extremely unpleasant for him.”
Sources also reveal that some IPL team owners have advised Modi to stay away from India. “Apart from the trouble he himself could get into, the franchisees are not keen to have warring officials at the IPL and BCCI, for it’s never good for business,” a source in a franchisee told Outlook. Modi, thus, is happy in cooler climes, away from the legal heat in India. His lawyers have been unable to inform the BCCI commission when he’s likely to present himself before it.
There are indications that the BCCI might have to wait for long; one indication is the direction his children are headed. His son Ruchir, 17, was in news recently when patrons of a Mumbai nightclub threw drinks at him because they were upset with the scandals his father has caused around the IPL. Sources say Ruchir has withdrawn from the American School in Mumbai, where he’s a student, and is off to Europe. “He took early examinations in May and is not likely to join the new term (which starts on August 12),” a source told Outlook. This source says that Ruchir could be admitted to a school in Europe, possibly the very exclusive and expensive Le Rosey in Switzerland, “where you learn to be a billionaire”, according to Forbes magazine. Modi’s daughter, Aliya, has already moved to another exclusive school in Switzerland.
Modi, say sources, owns an apartment in London, where the family also has another rented accommodation. In short, there are signs that Modi is becoming an NRI, and fulfilling the requirement of being away from India for over 184 days. “He’s taken his private plane away from India as he fears it could be seized by the authorities,” says a source.
Modi also has been using his time away, and his money, to socialise and make useful contacts. He bought three tables at a charity event for England’s Elephant Fund (which is initiated by Mark Shand, brother of Camilla Parker Bowles) in June, though he wasn’t present at the event, and sent his family instead.
A source has told Outlook that Modi has been trying to cultivate Shaukat Aziz, the former Pakistan prime minister, who lives in the vicinity of his apartment at London’s Cadogan Square. Aziz, before entering politics, was a respected banking professional, but his greatest attraction for Modi could be that he was rumoured to be working with L.N. Mittal, the steel baron. Aziz, it’s learnt, had lunch with the Modis once—and decided once was more than enough.
Modi’s current coordinates on this glittering itinerary of leisure is in Bali, for another holiday in a rented house. This will be followed by Bangkok, where his father, K.K. Modi, will celebrate his 70th birthday later this month. And then to perhaps another party, which prompts a BCCI official to chuckle: “He calls himself a businessman? He certainly holidays like no other businessman in history. Reminds me of how he dropped everything and camped in Rajasthan for years to get into cricket administration!”
The feeling in the board is that if Modi had any belief in winning his fight to keep control over the IPL, he’d have offered a bitter, tooth-and-nail fight. “This is the only venture he’s been successful in life, after countless failures in business, and he’d hate to give it up,” says a BCCI official. “However, the fact that he’s staying out of India instead of fighting it out suggests he’s aware of the futility of it all. Instead, he’s just arguing that the BCCI committee is biased, and wants its members to recuse themselves.”
BCCI president Shashank Manohar has recused himself; Modi’s lawyers demand that Chirayu Amin do the same. They do have a point—Amin, after all, was a member of the IPL governing council, which was responsible for the conduct of the event. Why doesn’t the BCCI hold an independent inquiry? “Well, with the kind of money he’s accumulated, we fear that he may influence an inquiry which is not conducted internally by the BCCI,” says an official.
But what about the future? Is Modi likely to give up the IPL? Just before being suspended, he had said: “I did not create this to just walk away because XYZ says what they feel like.” But he seems to have done just that, leaving his lawyers to fight his war.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT