Kanishka Singh, AIDE, Fixes appointments, schedules, numbercruncher
Notwithstanding the inaccuracy in his prophecy, Kanishka's article brought him to the notice of Rahul Gandhi. A year later, Kanishka was ensconced in 12, Tughlak Lane as a close aide of the young Gandhi. He came to be a key member of the team that would script the Congress's stunning success in '09.
This election, as Rahul Gandhi clocked thousands of miles and travelled to 120 constituencies, Kanishka kept a close watch, a constant companion to a lonely leader who trusted few in his battle to silence his many critics.
Sachin Rao, AIDE, Interfaces with IYC and NSUI
Like him, Sachin Rao was also looking for a revolution. In his multidisciplinary action project report at the University of Michigan Business School, Sachin wrote: "When I am asked what I want to do with my life, my unabashed answer today is that I want to change the world." In complete awe of management guru C.K. Prahalad, Sachin returned to India and did a stint with Gurcharan Das's Centre for Civil Society as a senior research associate for livelihood issues. Soon, he was noticed by Rahul Gandhi and hired to become a key part of the Tughlak Lane office.
Both Sachin and Kanishka share similarities with their boss. Both come from fairly powerful families—one the son of a high-profile IFS officer (former foreign secretary and current governor of Rajasthan) while the other's father was in the IAS. Exceptionally bright students, their minds were shaped in the West, from where they dreamed of bringing corporate arguments to usher in change. In a published article in 2006, Sachin argued that corporate India needed to visualise a slum such as Nehru Nagar in Mumbai "as a customer, deserving of our undivided, profit-inspired attention in entrepreneurial energy".
But key to Rahul's strategy were several other party functionaries in his team. Meenakshi Natarajan, a grassroots leader, is unlike the others. With a masters degree in biochemistry and a bachelor's degree in law, Meenakshi toured hundreds of miles to revive the NSUI, adding lakhs as members. The daughter of a textile engineer, Meenakshi is a first-generation politician. "When Rahul asked me if I wanted to contest the elections, I was confused. But he said that if I wanted to be a leader I would have to take tough decisions and follow them through. That made it easy for me. I took up the challenge and I won from a constituency that has seen only four Congress MPs in 60 years," Meenakshi told Outlook.
Jitendra Singh, MP, Alwar, Pointsperson in charge of the Youth Congress
But perhaps the closest political aide to Rahul was Jitendra Singh. A two-time MLA from Rajasthan, he was the party's secretary in charge of the Indian Youth Congress (IYC). Like Rahul, Jitendra had a public school education, had proved his mettle in electoral politics, came from the royal family of Alwar and was well-versed with the inner workings of the Congress party. Rahul chose him to tour 17 states at a relentless pace in less than a year, where he interviewed and appointed leaders at the district and state levels.
A man of infinite patience, Jitendra ensured that local Youth Congress leaders spread the message of development contained in central schemes such as the NREGS and the prime minister's loan waiver package for farmers. "The IYC was directionless and full of sycophants. We wanted to change that and bring in a merit-based system where anyone could come in and make a mark," he says.
Pankaj Shankar, AIDE, Pointsperson who looks at media-related issues
If he succeeded, others also played crucial roles. Pankaj Shankar made his mark as a documentary filmmaker after working briefly as a journalist. After another brief stint with Doordarshan as an assignment editor, he did a film on the Gujarat riots—In The Name of Faith—and became the pointsman for Rahul Gandhi on media-related issues.
Milind Deora, MP, South Mumbai, Close friend, sets up policy workshops
Jitin Prasada and Milind Deora, friends as well as parliamentary colleagues, helped in setting up informal workshops that would debate policies. Milind would initiate the debate on RTI in Parliament while Jitin would play a key role in UP. Says Deora of Rahul: "He thinks far ahead of most people I know. In 2004 he was thinking of the election in 2009 and in 2009 he is already thinking of 2014. He may not play to the media gallery but that does not mean he does not have his eyes and ears to the ground."
True, most of those on Team Rahul come from privileged backgrounds. They are, in many ways, part of the elite that has continued to prosper in a country where millions starve. But a common thread that binds them is their aspiration to be tools for change. For many of them, being with Rahul Gandhi is an opportunity to usher in a India that is equitable, democratic and sustained by good market economics.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT