Why is that so many Indian investors are headed to acquire land in Ethiopia?
It is opportunistic—easier—to move in quickly to a country where one does not have to follow a lot of regulations and have a regime that is not too concerned by the absence of regulations to protect its people and the environment. With the civil society almost missing and dissent criminalized, the Ethiopian government can carry out its land lease project, ignoring human rights violations. No dissent is allowed. It doesn’t tolerate any opposition, especially political. 30,000 people were arrested during the last elections. NGOs are afraid to operate, they have had to shut down. The land that these Indian companies are being given has been forcefully taken away from indigenous communities and deals are struck with these firms in secrecy and without consultation of the local impacted communities.
When it is mainly the Ethiopian government that is responsible for the wrongdoing, why should India be held responsible?
We are certainly responsible. As a nation that takes pride in morality and non-violence, our investment policies must focus on development for all and in no harm to anyone. We need to set new standards. Instead the Indian firms are using the Ethiopian government to the dirty work so that they can operate easily. It’s like the British government trying to argue that colonialism in India was not its doing but that of the East India Company and a few rogue generals like Dwyer.
Does India want to be the Karuturi that is responsible for depravation, destitution in Ethiopia? Is that the legacy we want? The question is one of what kind of development paradigm we choose —the one that lifts all boats or the one the one that lifts just a few yachts? It is appalling that India, once colonised, has turned into a coloniser. Ethnic indigenous communities are being hunted down like animals to clear land for Indian firms and businesses. India is behind the government of Ethiopia that is unleashing this kind of terror.
It’s not unlike POSCO and Vedanta in India, who are taking up land that belongs to indigenous people, violating the rights of the nature and her people. But people in India have stood up and challenged. Even the civil society in India has stood up against corruption, stood up for the right to land and livelihoods and south-south collaboration. Despite the repressive conditions in Ethiopia, where the government tolerates no dissent, especially political, many brave Ethiopians are sending us information. The report is not a desktop job but actually a result of rigorous fieldwork and primary research. As a country once colonised, it’s our responsibility to start a conversation about development that is not just about profiteering or corporations. It’s not that we are singling out India; there are Chinese and Saudi investors, American universities who are buying up land as investment. However, in India’s case it is being sold as something that would enhance the country’s food security, which is far from true.
Why do you think is the Indian government turning a blind eye to the problems in Ethiopia?
Governments around the world deliberately choose to be blind. If the Indian government can be blind to what’s going on in the Naxal-affected areas, then it can also be blind to what’s going on in Ethiopia and to its indigenous people. What is going on in Ethiopia is not unlike what is going on in areas that are under the influence of Naxals or Maoists, whatever you call them. At the end of the day, it is a struggle for resources.
The short-term profits help you turn a blind eye to the long-term consequences, including long-term conflict and increased risk to the investment itself. The report has been done not because we are doing some kind of charity to Ethiopia but because we in India are facing the same issues. This is not unpatriotic. We need a different kind of India. An India which can shine with the true face of democracy. Where so called development projects are designed in consultation with the local communities, reflect aspirations of all, and lead to the larger common good. If people in India knew about what these firms are doing, they would surely stand up. Certain communities and their ways of life have become dispensable and the question to ask is who chose this model of development and whose interest is represented here. Simply follow the money...
Who are the people rushing in? Some of them are small-time firms, relatively unknown…
It has been a big rush for land grab in Africa, including Ethiopia. The actors are diverse—from known personalities such as the reputable American universities investing in private equity and hedge funds to unknown entities entering the field of agriculture. They want to rush in and grab the land at very cheap prices before the value of the land goes up. Journalists and researchers have had a hard time digging up details, contracts signed between the investors and the government have had to be leaked to us. So, you can imagine the kind of participation the indigenous people have had in this phenomenon. In Ethiopia, people do not have the right to land. So pastoralists who have lived on land for centuries can be considered as squatters overnight by the government and chased away as if they never existed and should not exist.
I was in South Sudan recently (in August) and you can now see the same kind of rush there with Indians trying to secure deals that involve oil-petroleum deals and agro-forestry projects. The Madhvani Group, which is owned by Indians from Uganda, is trying to set up a sugar plantation in a national park. But these firms will not have it so easy in South Sudan as in Ethiopia because the president is under immense pressure to ensure transparency on land deals.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Most of the communities in the entire Indian sub-continent(such as Bengali) are succumbed in ‘Culture of Poverty'(Oscar Lewis), irrespective of class or economic strata, lives in pavement or apartment. Nobody is genuinely regret ed or ashamed of the deep-rooted corruption, decaying general quality of life, worst Politico-admin system, bad work place, weak mother language, continuous consumption of common social space (mental as well as physical, both). We are becoming fathers & mothers only by self-procreation, mindlessly & blindfold(supported by some lame excuses). Simply depriving their(the children) fundamental rights of a decent, caring society, fearless & dignified living. Do not ever look for any other positive alternative behaviour (values) to perform human way of parenthood, i.e. deliberately co-parenting children those are born out of ignorance, extreme poverty. It seems that all of us are being driven only by the very animal instinct. If the Bengali people ever be able to bring that genuine freedom (from vicious cycle of ‘poverty’) in their own attitude, involve themselves in ‘Production of Space’ (Henri Lefebvre), an intense attachment with the society at large - one different pathway has to create to overcome inherent 'hopeless' mindset; decent, rich Politics will definitely come up. – Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay, 16/4, Girish Banerjee Lane, Howrah -711101, India.
People of Assam relish fish and Assam has large water bodies fit for growing fish. But truck loads of Fish packed in termocol boxes are transported from Andhra to Assam as people of Assam are not growing fish. So if the marshes and water bodies in Assam are given to fish farmers of Andhra, Assam will be benifited by getting cheaper fish. The nation will benifit by reduced expenditure of subsidised Deisel to transport fish from Andhra to Assam.
Similarly, if "under producing land" in Ethiopia is put under intense cultivation, food shortage in Ethiopia can be eliminated. The critics are mainly NGOs involved in relief programmes in Ethiopia as their "shops will close" if Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan etc become self sufficient in food. No more relief camps and no more "millions from UN".
"It's share ill luck of the natives of SA that they haven't kicked the Indians out yet." Sanket Biswas
Please feel free to kick yourself out of India and do yourself and everyone else a favor.
Twenty years ago, my Marxist friends from Kolkata would tell me about the socialist paradise of Albania where "to each according to his need, from each according to his ability" was the norm. Alas - the Iron Curtain fell and Comrade Enver Hoxha was revealed to be just another East European thug and Albanian society turned out to be brutal and backward. Where is the new socialist paradise? Is there any country in the world whose business practices you admire? Or is private enterprise itself evil?
"most people of Indian origin did not vote him. They voted for the minority white regime. It's share ill luck of the natives of SA that they haven't kicked the Indians out yet."
Some excessive self-hatred here.
I read the interview with interest.
In 2008, a news in Times of India reported, " It was 36 years ago that dictator Idi Amin threw out 55,000 Indians, majority Gujaratis, lock, stock and barrel from Uganda. Gujaratis, from this East African country, migrated to UK, Canada and other European countries and scaled heights with their entrepreneurial zeal....."
I remember a teacher who returned from Uganda narrate his expeirece there. The Gujarati business men would cheat through frauds simple natives of Uganda in very possible manner, as Bengalis did to the innocent tribal people in the nineteenth century in Chota Nagpur now Jharkhand.
If an Ugandan went to buy 4 metres of cloth from a Gujarati shop there, the businessman would measure four ends of one metre and charged price accordingly for 4 metres of cloth. Only a dictator Idi Amin could have kicked out the rogues to relieve his people. Good riddance! This was one good job the hated dictator did for his country.
Indians outreaching Ethiopia would indulge, if not already, in the nefarious practices and earn soon blind enmity of the natives, who will rise in revolt against India and Indians. When in India, the downtrodden sections are brutalized in every possible manner by the same classes and their cohorts aided abd abetted by the Government, where and how does a question of dignified behavious towards natives there arise?
When Nelson Mandela fought election after his release from long life in jail, most people of Indian origin did not vote him. They voted for the minority white regime. It's share ill luck of the natives of SA that they haven't kicked the Indians out yet.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT