At the heart of the bloody death in the Chhattarpur farmhouse on the outskirts of Delhi is the fact that Ponty was a master in the art of multiplying money overnight. His interests ranged from liquor retail, real estate, sugar, paper, films and entertainment. His empire, better known as the Wave Group, is conservatively valued at Rs 6,000 crore. Chadha’s brothers, sons and a grandson run parts of the empire, but it is Ponty’s networking skills that kept the group ahead. Having established his exclusive sway over the liquor trade across Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Haryana, he chose to enter a completely different one—that of supplying ‘panjeeri’ (ready-to-eat whole wheat food supplement) for distribution to poor children in government schools. Today, this segment alone is said to be worth Rs 9,000 crore—a figure incredibly close to UP’s liquor trade, valued at about Rs 12,000 crore.
No change of government made any difference to his clout. An upright Uttar Pradesh bureaucrat, who has seen Ponty’s modus operandi from close quarters during both Mayawati’s and Mulayam Singh Yadav’s tenures as chief ministers, says, “Ponty Chadha had emerged like a super government: he could own anything he laid his hands on. The Mayawati government went to the extent of doling out huge chunks of prime land along NH-24, where he carved out two prime Noida sectors under the banner of Wave City that helped him reap a rich harvest.”
Ponty’s meteoric rise completely overshadowed his humble beginnings. His father Kulwant Singh began by selling fried fish from a hand-cart parked outside a country-made liquor shop in Peeru-Madara town, located between Ramnagar and Moradabad. Way back in the 1980s, a Garhwal-based journalist called Umesh Dobhal was bumped off for running a campaign against the clandestine sale of liquor in the hills, where it was prohibited. Ponty was even accused of adulterating a popular Ayurvedic tonic with alcohol to work around prohibition laws.
At least a dozen prominent politicians of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, along with an equal number of IAS officers from the two states, have reportedly invested their ill-gotten wealth in Ponty’s companies. With his death, their biggest worry now is to retrieve their money.
By Sharat Pradhan with Chandrani Banerjee
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Ponty Chaddha style of doing business is kind of standard practice in India to swiftly climb up the ladders of success.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT