Arvind Kejriwal says the next general election is going to be fought between the Aam Aadmi Party and the BJP. What is your assessment?
I do not see this country polarised between the BJP and AAP. It is a hyper active media which is trying to create this impression. Ground realities, I believe, are very, very different.
You don’t believe the BJP or AAP will benefit the most in the current political situation?
The only certainty is that because of its poor performance, the Congress and the UPA will suffer electoral reverses. In states where the BJP and the Congress find themselves in a direct contest, BJP will benefit. But wherever there is a three-cornered contest, as in Delhi Assembly election, I don’t think BJP can hope to do equally well.
Why does it appear that eastern and southern states are most likely to slow down the BJP?
BJP was never an all-India party. It benefited from the decline of other parties like socialist parties and the Swatantra Party etc. The Election Commission does recognise it as a national party but let us not forget that the highest number of seats it ever won in the Lok Sabha is 182. And that was largely because of the personality of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the disillusionment with the Congress and the allies it managed to attract. Now the BJP is left with only Shiv Sena and the Akali Dal.
Do you regret leaving the NDA and dumping BJP in June last year?
Not for a moment. People were surprised because conventional thinking is that one does not disturb the status quo and risk uncertainty. We put the government at risk. But it was deliberate and we were clear in our mind that this was the right decision. We have had no reason to change our mind.
"(Re Modi), you do not have to be born OBC to become an OBC leader. Chaudhary Charan Singh, Lohia, JP... none of them was OBC". You still think this was the correct decision?
But will it benefit you politically?
Political decisions are not taken on the basis of profit and loss accounts. The issue was whether it was the right thing to do. And we were convinced that it was. And if you ask me, I am convinced that we will lose nothing. We would have regretted the decision if we had found it difficult to do what we wanted to do. But we have been doing what we wanted. In fact we have found it easier to carry out things after we broke up with the BJP.
You have been close to several national leaders of the BJP. And a section of them was said to be opposed to Narendra Modi being projected as a prime ministerial candidate. Did they ever explain how it happened?
They did not explain anything to me. They did not have to. But several BJP leaders initially felt that this would not happen. Then came a time when they felt it would not be good for the party. Thereafter they realised it was inevitable and after some time, I guess, they felt that it would benefit the BJP.
Do you see the hand of the RSS in it?
What is BJP without the RSS ? It is the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which provides oxygen to the BJP. It is the foundation on which BJP stands. And it is certainly very pro-active this time.
Do you find that the RSS has become stronger in the last few years?
I have no idea. But I certainly do not see as many RSS ‘shakhas’ active as we would see when we were younger.
But political observers feel JD(U) may even find it difficult to field candidates in all the 40 Lok Sabha constituencies in the state?
(Laughs) Those who are suggesting this may have a problem finding suitable candidates. Thankfully, I have no such problem. There is no dearth of good candidates.
The same observers feel Narendra Modi may find a resonance in Bihar as the BJP is projecting him as a leader of the OBCs. What’s your reaction?
I call this arm-chair analysis. To be a leader of the OBCs and espouse their cause, you do not have to take birth in a OBC family. Chaudhary Charan Singh, V.P. Singh, JP, Lohia, Raj Narayan, Madhu Limaye were all champions of the OBC cause but none of them was an OBC. The Jats in UP were deemed to be an upper caste. Birth is not important. You need certain qualities and you have to do the groundwork. You do not suddenly become an OBC leader.
But Narendra Modi in his speeches has been raising issues related to the poor and the OBCs…
Do you still maintain that Narendra Modi does not have any feeling for the poor?
I never said that. And I never took anyone’s name. All I said was that whoever becomes the Prime Minister must have feelings for and an understanding of the poor and poorer states. Bharatiya Janata Party leaders reacted vehemently and drew the inference that I was talking about a particular leader. Their inference suggested that they believed the leader lacked those feelings. Now you are also putting words in my mouth and drawing the same inference!
You seem to suggest the possibility of a fractured mandate despite the prevailing anti-Congress mood in the country?
There was a very real possibility of a decisive mandate against the Congress this time. All parties including the Left Front and others were united in opposing the Congress. Please recall the two Bharat Bandhs that were a huge success. But the BJP felt it could alone take on the Congress and took steps that damaged that unity across the political spectrum.
You do not also believe in Arvind Kejriwal’s prediction that an unprecedented political “aandhi” ( storm) is going to sweep everything?
It is an extreme position and I would not like to comment on it. But the fact is that there is no uniform trend in the country. Political ground realities in every state are different and will throw up diverse and different results.
Do you find parallels between the Aam Aadmi Party and the JP Movement of 1974?
You cannot be serious. Those were different times, difficult times. Young people were beaten up, detained, tortured, arrested, put in jail. And still the movement spread like wild fire. There was passion for sacrifice with no reward in sight. Do you find a similar mood in the country today ? It is like chalk and cheese.
But the issues raised by AAP, namely corruption, inflation and good governance seem to be the issues on which the next election is going to be fought ?
They have been issues in every election. People want an efficient, corruption-free government. That is a demand at the centre of every election. There has been systemic failure, also political failure. But even today you will find people’s representatives who lead modest, austere lives and those who like to be driven in flashy cars. There are people who are greedy in society and we need to keep fighting against corruption, even if it leads to your ouster. We have been doing this in Bihar.
What about AAP’s pitch on leaders being more accessible to people?
Political leaders have to be and are accessible to people. I do not know what kind of leaders are inaccessible to people and ground level workers. There are only two ways for leaders to come up. They either take up people’s issues and struggle to get close to people; or given a chance to govern, they get close to people with their governance.
Have you received overtures from the Congress for a pre-poll alliance?
No. This has never been discussed. There has been no talk, ever. And why should there be? Congress, which had a two-third majority in the Bihar Assembly in 1985, is nowhere to be found in the state.
"AAP and JP movement? You can’t be serious. Those were different times, difficult times. Young people were beaten up, detained, tortured, jailed". Media reports say Rahul Gandhi is more inclined to an alliance with you?
Must be a figment of the media’s imagination. I have never met him.
But you did say JD(U) would support whoever granted a special status to Bihar?
That was an economic agenda. And the UPA government did find merit in the demand. A committee formed by the Finance Minister, the Raghuram Rajan Committee, went into it and made certain recommendations. We were not entirely satisfied and recorded our dissent. But they unilaterally cancelled the meeting the Finance Ministry had called on November 26. And that was that. They took a political decision to put it in cold storage.
Any possibility of the UPA committing themselves to it now?
Where is the time? Had they followed it up in November and granted the special status, it would have helped the people of Bihar and the JD(U) no doubt. But it would also have helped the Congress find a foothold in Bihar.
So, if an alliance between Congress and JD(U) is ruled out, how would an alliance between Congress and the RJD impact you?
RJD is still a part of the UPA and they have been together in the past. What is new ? I do not see any fresh impact on the election.
What is the possibility that you would return to the NDA?
Even if the BJP secures around 200 seats and forms the government?
It doesn’t matter. We left the NDA on certain issues and there can be no question of going back on it.
And even if the BJP decides to make someone other than Narendra Modi the Prime Minister?
I have already said that the JD(U) has no interest in returning to the NDA and there is no possibility of reconsidering the decision.
Is there a possibility of a Third Front?
If by the third front, you mean a non-Congress, non-BJP alliance, there has been no movement to that direction. We had indeed come together for a conference against communalism in New Delhi, including AIADMK, AGP and JVM. But since then there has been no talk. In the past, Left parties would generally take the initiative in forging such an alliance. But this time they too do not appear to be interested. What is more, a third front may have had a resonance at one time but in this election, it does not appear to be a feasible or attractive proposition. Only the media keeps speculating on it.
There was some discussion between you and Mamata Banerjee, it was reported…
She was indeed serious about it but I had advised her that chief ministers of eastern states should first cooperate on the economy. They should come together and help each other out. This would have worked as a trust building measure and once that happened, it could be converted into a political pressure group. But beyond a few conversations, there has been no movement to that direction.
So, it was never very serious…?
I can’t say that. Political talks are seldom non-serious. But the idea has not taken off so far.
What about Naveen Patnaik?
I have had no discussion with him.
Would you say Bihar would rise above caste in this general election ?
Will Uttar Pradesh or Tamil Nadu rise above caste in this election? Caste plays a role across the country and it is wishful thinking that it will cease to play a role.
Politics, you said last year, was not carried out on Facebook and Twitter. Have you revised your opinion since then?
No! But I do find even old leaders tweeting although they are known to have wondered aloud what “IT-WT” was all about. Friends pressured me into writing a blog and I did write a few posts. But really, there is no substitute to hard work. I believe that in politics you do what you have to in public interest. The rest does not matter. Some people may need social media. I don’t.
A section of commentators feel that while you will have no trouble winning the Assembly election in 2015, you may have a hard time in the Lok Sabha election this year?
I see no logic in the argument. If people do not vote for me in the Lok Sabha, they will not vote for me in the Assembly election too. I do not see why they will reward my work for the Assembly but not for the Lok Sabha. I do not see why they would vote for people who have done nothing all these years but not for JD(U) and our government, which has done so much.
A shorter, edited version of this appears in print
“I don’t see India polarised between BJP and AAP.” Could Nitish Kumar have said anything else (Interview, Feb 03)? If he did, he would have been admitting that he is totally irrelevant on the national scene, and increasingly so in Bihar. I feel sorry for him.
Cdr Arun Visvanathan, Chennai
Nitish tried very hard to get into the Congress’s lap, but was shooed away with a wave of their hand in favour of Laloo Yadav. Then he tried to woo LJP, but even they said thanks but no thanks.
P.B. Joshipura, Suffolk, Virginia, US
“Fascism is knocking at the door,” says Nitish. Knocking? It’s already ruling Delhi.
K. Suresh, Bangalore
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Nitish Kumar is the most trusted politicain comparatively.He is also not as ambitious as Modi.He is well educated and more honest than Modi.He worked hard for Bihar and Biharis are ungrateful in not supporting his party.India would have been proud to have him as a PM.Keep up your good work Nitish.
One wrd of caution.Media is the message and he has no choice but followthis dictum in his political life.
Wish this man had shown similar spine in 2002 itself.
There was a time not long ago when MEDIA was celebrating Nitish as a better NON CONgress PM candidate and alternative to Mr NAMO..
Where is that MEDIA now?
>> May be you have missed the quotable quotes from the likes of Ashutosh, Bharti, Kejriwal et al.
No, I didn't. If you have something specific in mind, let us know.
#10 - Anwaar. May be you have missed the quotable quotes from the likes of Ashutosh, Bharti, Kejriwal et al.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT