“Even psychiatrists don’t recognise this as a problem. So when you share your thoughts and with people some of whom have had worse experiences, it gives you a little courage,” says Arjun. It’s been only two months but some well-planned deaddiction sessions have launched Arjun on the path to recovery. Or so, he believes.
At the modest sky-blue computer lab-like meeting place, addicts like Arjun follow a ‘12-step’ de-addiction programme based on a template set by Alcoholics Anonymous. There are about 25-30 people holding hands, meditating, discussing past traumas. “I experienced both joy and hope from knowing that the sexual chaos of my life had a name and that it held in it the potential for recovery,” reveals Sagar, 26, who’s just completed 90 days of ‘sobriety’. The weekly sessions kick off with the edict, “I Am A Sex Addict”, the first recognisable step on the ladder to recovery.
Started over a year ago, SAA is a comfort space for sexaholics in Delhi in the absence of adequate psychiatric care or support structures. “Competent psychiatrists or sexologists can help addicts to an extent, but support groups provide the backbone of care. A commonality of experiences binds people,” says sexologist Prakash Kothari, who set up Asia’s first department of sexology at KEM Hospital, Mumbai. With more deaddiction centres for other maladies and an increase in consciousness, sexual healing too got a shot in the arm. Delhi, Bangalore and Ahmedabad now have centres.
Indeed, sexual obsession can be both complex and layered. The term, coined by Patrick Carnes in 1983 in his book Out of the Shadows: Understanding Sexual Addiction, has of late become vivid in the popular imagination with several books and films on the subject, not to mention the celebrities unravelling in full public gaze. Michael Fassbender in Steve McQueen’s Shame, and other films like Nymphomaniac and Thanks for Sharing have taken a somewhat taboo subject till now head on. Recent books like Don’t Call it Love: Recovery from Sexual Addiction and Wired for Intimacy: How Pornography Hijacks the Male Brain too have put the spotlight on the issue. An estimated two million internet porn addicts are in and out of recovery today in the West.
According to Dr A. Chakravarthy, consultant in sexual medicine in Kerala, “Diagnosing sexual addiction is primarily through investigating sexual history. Patients spend excessive time seeking ways to gratify sexual urges and feel distressed if they can’t. There are feelings of guilt, but that doesn’t stop them from indulging in similar behaviour again. Indeed, it becomes their coping mechanism to deal with stress and loneliness.”
Suresh, a 46-year-old recovering graphic designer, remembers his former self as a “mentally sick person” scouring through “50 kilos” of pornography in six months and allowing real-world relationships to suffer. “I was an addict from the age of 11 right up to 40. The mind of an addict is differently wired and one has to work hard on one’s sobriety. The aim isn’t abstinence but stopping obsession.” What Suresh laments is the fact that psychiatrists, instead of getting addicts into support groups, are only concerned about their own business. “Even now, when an addict walks into the office of a psychiatrist, he feels the stigma staring right at him.” Still, there is light at the end of the tunnel. “It’s like a spiritual cleansing when you finally come out on the other side,” says Suresh.
(Names changed to protect identities)
By Priyadarshini Sen with Siddhartha Mishra
Highly ill-informed, irresponsible content about Indian saints (Hypersexed, Jun 9). Shameful that Outlook has fallen to such low standards that it had to use Asaram Bapu’s photo in the article. The sant has been framed, it is a conspiracy.
Himanshu Sharma, Hyderabad
This is a planned attack on Hinduism. How can you use Nityananda Swamiji’s photo? Whoever wrote this article better count his/her days. You are going against god now.
It is absolutely insane to include Swami Nityananda in your hypersexed list. It was a morphed video on a private Tamil TV channel.
Raman, Sun Prairie, US
You have carried some photos of eminent people on your hypersexed list. I am surprised you left out one name, Tarun Tejpal, whose sexcapades are very recent. Was it because he’s ex-Outlook?
C.S. Venkatesh, on e-mail
It's appalling to read such malicious lies about Swami Nityananda. How do you build credibility as journalists when you spread lies about the innocent?
Rose Li, San Francisco
It’s been proven that Nityanandaji was always innocent. This is pure ignorance, and it goes against dharma to have put him on the hypersexed list.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
What a bunch of lies! it's been proven that Swamiji Nithyananda is and has always been innocent ! This is pure ignorance, and it goes against dharma to have put him on this list!!!
If indeed this authoress wants to discuss about 'sex addiction', then she must open up to the fact that there are many women sex addicts out there too - some of them simply 'serving up sex' ( prostitutes )
She must also address female mental issues, such as Bipolar Disorder and Personaility Disorders, to remain neutral.
It is absolutely insane to include swamiji in this list just because a morphed video has been shown on a private tamil channel without knowing the authenticity of that news...
this is planned attack on hinduism( especially sri paramahamsa nithyananda swamiji) who ever wrote this article please start to count ur days , bcoz u are against god now!!!!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT