SMOOTH, according to the Concise Oxford English Dictionary, means untroubled by difficulties and adverse conditions. For more than a week, 'smooth' was the word repeatedly used by nearly half-a-dozen senior Karnataka ministers to describe the expected transition in the state as former chief minister H.D. Deve Gowda waited in the wings to take over as prime minister. But if the events that led to the swearing-in of 65-year-old Jayadevappa Halappa Patel as the new chief minister are anything to go by, 'smooth' was redefined to mean just the opposite.
"The transition will be a smooth affair and will be over in half-an-hour. As deputy chief minister, I am the natural choice to succeed Deve Gowda." That was the first salvo fired by Patel and it triggered off the race—with himself in lane one—for the coveted chair on the third floor of Vidhana Soudha. But Patel had to go through 10 hours of negotiations, dissension and anxiety before he was able to breast the tape at the end of the day. Finance Minister Siddaramaiah was disqualified by consensus and forced to accept the number two position of deputy chief minister.
The trouble began when the list of contenders started growing after Patel's announcement of being the natural choice and a sulking Ramakrishna Hegde, considered by some as Patel's mentor, covertly endorsed his candidature by joining the 'smooth' brigade. Siddaramaiah, a relatively young backward class leader belonging to the Kuruba (shepherd) community, threw his hat into the ring by lobbying support from MLAs belonging to the backward classes for Karnataka's first chief minister from the backward classes and give a boost to Janata Dal's social justice plank. Home Minister P.G.R. Sindhia, a Maratha backward and also a Gowda lieutenant, Agriculture Minister C. Byre Gowda, another Vokkaliga, and Industries Minister R.V. Deshpande added to the confusion by staking claim for the top job.
"Staking claim despite the realisation that one stands no chance is a political trick. It is done with the hope of getting an important portfolio when the ministry is formed and maybe 10 years later be considered more seriously due to their history of staking claim," a senior minister in the cabinet said tongue-in-cheek about the attempts of his colleagues. As if to prove him right, the contest narrowed down to Patel and Siddaramaiah as the JD legislature party was convened and the arithmetic of caste combinations took over.
As chief minister, Gowda had antagonised the Ling-ayats—who have 38 JD MLAs, the largest number in the assembly—by denying them important portfolios and not appointing them as heads of government boards and corporations in the state. With his elevation to the country's highest political office after a creditable performance in the Lok Sabha elections in Karnataka, Gowda saw this as the ideal opportunity to buy peace by allowing for Patel's 'natural succession'. But Siddaramaiah, boosted by the arrival of Sharad Yadav as central observer on deputation by party president Laloo Prasad Yadav, was hellbent on queering the pitch. The JDLP meeting was adjourned after a five-member committee consisting of Gowda, Hegde, Bommai, state JD president C.M. Ibrahim and Yadav failed to arrive at a decision.
"While the committee insisted on a consensus decision, Siddaramaiah, confident of gaining the approval of the majority of legislators, wanted to force the issue through voting. About 70 per cent of the legislators were expected to vote for him," a Gowda confidant told Outlook. With voting expected to bring out the division in the party, Gowda refused to accede to Siddaramaiah's demand and the committee browbeat the finance minister to wait his turn.
A Lohiaite known for his witty oratorical skill, Patel is, however, seen to have lost the motivation for administration and is considered to be very laidback. He is said to have confessed in private that he would not be able to work as hard as his predecessor who put in 18-hour days. Which according to political observers, means a change in the functioning style of the administrative machinery, though no drastic deviations in policies are expected.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT