Once Kumar Krishnamsetty breathes his last, whenever that happens, his family won’t have to fret about sombre funeral rites. For there will be no cremation, nor even an interment. Instead, what Krishnamsetty’s will will insist is an immediate and efficacious despatch of his body to a vault in Arizona in the US. That’s why, instead of a pandit, they will probably be speed-dialling an airline executive. It’s in Scottsdale that he has chosen to rest in peace. Actually freeze in peace, in liquid nitrogen at minus 120 degree Celsius. Not forever, though, only until the day science has progressed enough to bring him back from the dead.
To live forever is a common enough wish but this Hyderabad-based filmmaker has gone further, wagered his hard-earned money—around a lakh a year—on an idea that most would call fanciful. This makes him possibly the only Indian to have signed up for an ambitious cryogenics programme with the US-based Alcor Life Extension Foundation. (There are other firms in the US too that sell the same dream but none in India.) Critics will deride it as nothing but a graveyard with super-chilled vats that double as coffins but its proponents think of it as anything but that. For them, it’s a halfway house where the dead, preserved in as pristine a form as possible, are spoken of as “live-in customers” or “patients” and where they lie in wait to be revived if they ever get lucky.
A grand con, did you say? That’s clearly not how Krishnamsetty sees it. “It’s actually mostly a research institute where they are doing major work in neuroscience, neurobiology and on stem cells,” he says on the phone from Hyderabad. All these are technologies that Alcor, founded in 1972, hopes one day will bust malignant tumours or repair damaged organs in 117 frozen “patients”, some of them just heads with their brains intact, that they have stacked up in their vault. Another 982, including Krishnamsetty who has chosen to have his entire body cryopreserved, are in a ghostly queue, hopeful that bizarre science fiction will one day finally become mundane reality.
Even if that were possible, there’d be many among us who would consider 70 to be a ripe enough age to head for our final resting places. But not Krishnamsetty. For him, 200 sounds like a better number. Or why not even 500? “A lot of people ask me if I won’t be bored living that long. I don’t see any possibility of that. I love life too much, there is so much beauty and so much to embrace in this world that I do not want to see an end,” he adds. “Beauty lies in everything, doing yoga peacefully, watching the unending sea, holding the hand of someone you love....”
Some of Alcor’s ‘members’ have made a conscious decision to even stay as close as they can to the Scottsdale facility. This is so they can reduce any delays in getting their bodies to the nitrogen- cooled vats, increasing whatever little odds they may have of walking around ever again. Krishnamsetty, who divides his time between Hyderabad and Portland and also travels widely in AP to make his films, hasn’t made that drastic choice, yet. “There are some members who don’t even travel. So there’s always a risk in what I am doing but I can’t tie myself down to one place.” It’d be a terrible waste, after all, to be tied down in the only life you have. And that too for another life that may never happen.
Getting this shot at afterlife is an expensive proposition and not for mere men—a full body cryopreservation costs over Rs 1.2 crore. But Krishnamsetty, who wouldn’t have thought twice to put in that kind of money if he had enough, figured out a better deal with his life insurance firm that will help him meet those charges for a monthly premium of around Rs 7,800. But would it really be worth living if your family or friends were no longer alive to give you company? Krishnamsetty tried to change that too. When his father passed away, he tried to convince his family members to have him cryopreserved at Alcor but they didn’t budge. “Given a chance, I’d prefer my family members opt for it too but they have different views and I have to respect that,” he says. Just as they respect his decision to try and defy the karmic cycle of life and death. “It’s something that is entirely personal, like one’s religion. My family is not against it but they are not really for it either.” Still single, Krishnamsetty understandably would want his partner to be someone who respects his decision and can, if possible, even join him at Alcor.
But his decision to live for as long as possible, as he explains, is not really a self-indulgent exercise. Like most people, he has a long list of things he feels he needs to complete. “I have lots of things I’d like to do, not just personal but for the world. If you love humanity, it’s not just about your immediate family. It’s about the others in need, the other relationships you make,” he says. To begin with, making all the films he has planned will take another 40-odd years. What next? “I love teaching and would want to give back to humanity what I have learnt in filmmaking, music and dance.” A few short films in his kitty, this former software engineer is now awaiting his first big commercial release, Minurugulu (Fireflies), a Telugu film with character actors Ashish Vidyarthi and Raghubir Yadav in the lead. And if he makes enough money, he’d also want to start something like Alcor in India. “It may no longer be that radical an idea here.”
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Gosh, that "some of them just heads with their brains intact" reminded me of the classic William and Mary, by Roald Dahl. William dies, but his philosopher brain is preserved, along with a gimlet of an eye. Very bad idea, as he gets his comeuppance. All things come to those who wait. Enjoy: http://bit.ly/16Prkqb
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT