Linguistics Minorities Commission has filed 47 reports on the dispute
Pleas Before The SC
(Source: Madhav Chavan, advocate assisting panel in SC)
The drive from Panjim in Goa to Belgaum in Karnataka is idyllic this time of the year. Rainswept roads look out into the lush green countryside. A police checkpost manned by grim-looking cops barely 15 km from town does break the reverie though. A long picket of police vehicles is visible as one approaches Yellur, with people quickly dispersing at the sight of any vehicle.
The Karnataka village, where police allegedly assaulted Marathi-speaking people over the weekend, figured in the Lok Sabha on Thursday last week with Shiv Sena MPs warning of repercussions in Maharashtra and demanding Union territory status for Belgaum and adjoining areas. The BJP MPs from Karnataka were as vocal in opposing the demand.
It all started with a simple signboard reading ‘Yellur, Maharashtra’. Yellur, of course, is in Karnataka but the signboard had been there for several years now. Belgaum police say they took it down following a recent order of the Karnataka HC. The administration also claims to have taken people into confidence and briefed people’s representatives, including local MLA Sambhaji Patil. But it still provoked some people—outsiders, according to some accounts—into reinstalling a similar signboard within 24 hours. This time the police went charging in, beating up people, dragging them out of houses and arresting a large number of suspects, triggering a fresh bout of violence.
The incident has revived an old dispute. The two states have been fighting over the region since 1956, with Maharashtra filing a petition as late as 2006 before the Supreme Court, where it is pending. The Maharashtra assembly has taken up as many as 18 resolutions against Karnataka, accusing the latter of acting against Marathi interests. The acrimony has played out locally even before: the Belgaum municipality, including the Marathi-speaking mayor and deputy mayor, was dismissed in 2011 and again superceded in 2012. But with elections in Maharashtra in October, the Shiv Sena has pounced on the emotive issue and has revived the demand of central rule in the region.
The struggle intensified post-1986 when learning Kannada was made mandatory (incidentally, learning Marathi is mandatory in Maharashtra too). Several leaders, including Sharad Pawar and Chhagan Bhujbal, had then clandestinely reached Belgaum and participated in a satyagraha to support the Maharashtra Ekikaran Samiti’s (MES) fight.
According to the Marathi people in Yellur and Belgaum, things have become more difficult in the past few years because now all governmental work is done only in Kannada and in no other language—agricultural records, judicial notifications, taxes, circulars, death certificates and so on. And that has intensified positions on both sides.
Photograph by Apoorva Salkade
Now this is the version of events by most people in Yellur and also members of the MES. The police have another. “The situation is under control now. The villagers pelted stones and came with lathis and talwars to re-erect the board. If they disobey the administration so wilfully, we have to act, we have to be firm,” says SP Chandragupta.
Emotions are running high. “The HC order was not specifically to destroy the board. As it is, they have not followed the order to the letter vis-a-vis providing documents in minority languages, so why the rush to remove the board?” asks Vasantrao Patil, president of MES. The man may be in his late 70s but he’s relentless, addressing meetings, calling to revive an agitation that started five decades ago, and sees fitful flashes of energy. The basic demand is that 865 villages in the districts of Belgaum, Nippani and Bidar be handed over to Maharashtra based on the constitutional principle of language affinity (see box).
However, scratch the surface of sleepy- happy, culturally rich Belgaum and a slightly different picture emerges. The Marathi majority population (49-60 per cent) speaks both languages fairly well. So do the Kannadigas in the city. The Marathi, with the extended ‘hoooo’ and missing gender, sounds very much like Kannada. The converse is true too. Shopkeepers, autorickshaw drivers, professionals—everyone is bilingual.
At the residence of the Kulkarni family, the border controversy comes up in conversation every few months in passing. A Kannada family but steeped in Marathi culture with relatives spread all over, from Mumbai to Bangalore, they speak both languages at home. “I can speak Kannada and I read and write in it. But I do all my calculations only in Marathi,” says Krishnaji Kulkarni, the grandfather. “Not just that, there is a mixed version where Kannada and Marathi is used in equal measure and it is neither and both at the same time,” he laughs, loudly demonstrating the “dialect”.
His son Praveen, who runs a provision store and does translation work on the side (English to Kannada and Marathi and vice-versa), has put his daughter in a Kendriya Vidyalaya to avoid any ambiguity about languages. “Frankly, it never comes up in daily affairs. I understand that there are problems when documents are compulsorily done in Kannada. I am fully with the people who demand that minorities should get governmental work done in their language (which the HC too has ordered, but is yet to happen). Imagine a Marathi speaker at a crematorium filling up forms in Kannada when you are grieving someone’s death and also struggling to complete formalities. That said, the only ones to benefit from the border struggle is a handful of ambitious political leaders, not the people. The social fabric of this city is a very special one. It needs to be understood at all levels.” The family avidly follows Marathi theatre and Praveen rattles off artiste names like Gangubai Hangal, Bhimsen Joshi, Indira Sant and P.L. Deshpande who either belonged to or lived in Belgaum/Karnataka and contributed in Maharashtra.
His sister and brother-in-law, Vidya and Madhukar Shahapurkar, have retired in Belgaum after spending years in Goa, Bangalore and Baroda. “I worked for Bank of Maharashtra and spoke the language of whichever state I worked in. My son who works in Mumbai was not even aware of the trouble and bandh,” says Madhukar. “I really feel bad that despite Belgaum being close to Goa and Maharashtra and is part of Karnataka, it is Kolhapur, Dharwad-Hubli and Panjim that are prospering. Projects that can create employment and infrastructure do not come here. This place could have been so much more,” says Vidya, ruing that while the rest of country races ahead in the age of globalisation, Belgaum seems to be stuck in a time-warp.
Indeed, in the town everyone seems to get along well. Santosh S., a Marathi chartered accountant who runs his own company, employs Kannada, Marathi and Dakkhini-speaking Muslim workers. “It is a genuine problem when it comes to handling taxes and documentation if it is only in Kannada. What if someone gets cheated? What if something goes wrong? We find a way around it because of our experience. But in everyday life, we are great friends. I have friends who are staunch Kannada supporters but we all get together every now and then joke about it. Of course, no Marathi will like it if they are harassed on purpose,” he says, adding that his mother is a Kannadiga and at home they speak both languages. He says things go on normally until something like this flares up.
“There are many families with mixed backgrounds. In fact, in the past daughters were educated in Marathi and sons in Kannada to ensure matrimonial alliances for girls and government jobs for boys!” laughs Praveen Kulkarni. Finally, the crux of the matter comes down to jobs and family life. Marathis often rue the fact that they are not in the government jobs fray as Kannada is not their first or second language (that being English and Marathi or vice-versa).
Speak easy The Kulkarni family at their residence in Belgaum. (Photograph by Apoorva Salkade)
“Generations have seen their prospects messed up because of this issue. People have sacrificed everything but for how long? Fact of the matter is there is no agreement among political leaders from Maharashtra to support us,” says Achyut Mane, a retired professor, activist and an expert on the border issue. He is based in Nippani, a few kilometres from the Maharashtra border—here Marathis make up more than 90 per cent of the demographic. Contrary to other places, here the signboards on shops are in Marathi or English. It is near Nippani that buses cross the border on the Kolhapur route (Belgaum-Kolhapur-Pune). Because of the trouble, 20 trips have now been cancelled; buses were damaged in Kolhapur and Kagal. But officials says the situation is normal now.
“Although the spirit is there, the movement has lost steam because several factions have come up over the years. Earlier, MES used to have 7-8 MLAs, now there are just one or two. People have joined other political parties. While every leader supports our cause, no one does anything about it. Can we not have all 48 MPs from Maharashtra agree on this, like Telangana?” asks Mane, with practised rhetoric. Probe him a little more and his colleague snaps, “We are like a lamb stuck in a river stream where a tiger awaits on top and downstream a crocodile!”
In the meanwhile, there are reactions from the other side too. Not just the Karnataka government, which is mulling a ban on the MES, but also the Karnataka Rakshana Vedike, which has been openly making belligerent statements. Siddanagouda Patil, ex-mayor of Belgaum and former member of the state’s Kannada Development Committee, says: “Yellur is part of Karnataka. The state government did not take the board issue seriously earlier. They wanted to solve the problem peacefully and the police only did their duty in removing the board. But some mischievous elements, not all of them Marathis, want this issue to go on. If the Marathi people can accept the Mahajan Commission report, we are ready but they won’t accept it. So then we also have to take a stand.”
When asked about the provision of documents in Marathi, which seems to be the real issue bothering the majority, Patil says, “The Marathis must learn Kannada. It is the same policy in Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. If they want, the district administration will give circulars in English, Urdu, Hindi and Marathi. That’s not a major issue. But look at Akkalkot and Jath in Maharashtra where the local Kannada people are not allowed to have their own schools. They too face the same problem.” However, he grudgingly admits that development in Belgaum has been affected—water supply, roads, agriculture, there are many issues. “But that’s because the Marathi leaders don’t want the place to develop. Otherwise, there is no quarrel between Marathi and Kannada people,” he says.
Meanwhile, at the Kulkarni residence, discussions and repartees continue in several languages. A nostalgic moment is of P.L. Deshpande’s Raosaheb, a character sketch of a Kannadiga passionate about music. “Shincha te Marathi Kanadi ghal tyachya...,” thunders Raosaheb in a unique dialect asking that the issue be shoved up the neta’s you-know-what. Now only if he was real.
By Prachi Pinglay-Plumber in Belgaum
Maharashtra’s churlish behaviour in raking up the Belgaum issue time and again is highly deplorable (Do You Speak Angry?, Aug 11). Karnataka is one of the most tolerant and liberal states, borne out by the fact that it has nurtured other languages (Tulu, for example) and given other linguistic groups ample space to thrive.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
THe first part of acknowledging the whole problem is in declaring constitutionally that Linguistic Minorities across all of India (based on district of residence) need same government support as religious minorities.
Thus, a Tamil hindu living in Mumbai needs same or even more support from Government than a Marathi speaking Muslim in Mumbai. When are we going to accept this?
MES is portraing only half truth.
Does MES accept Mahajan Comitee Report completely?
If mahajan commitee fully accepted Karnataka retain Belgaum and will get 247 important places of Maharastra like Jatt,Sholapur etc
As per wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgaum_border_dispute#Excerpts_of_the_Mahajan_Report
summary of Mahajan committee report.
Belgaum to continue in Karnataka
Around 247 villages/places including Jatta, Akkalakote, Sholapur to be part of Karnataka
Around 264 villages/places including Nandagad, Nippani Khanapur to be part of Maharastra
Kasaragod (of Kerala) to be part of Karnataka
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT