“If I were to appear in 2011, I would definitely have not cleared the exam. What sense does it make to prioritise fluency in English in a competitive exam where several appear from rural areas and are absolutely out of touch with English?” asks Srinivasan, who studied in a Tamil-medium government school in Poongotam village in Tiruvarur district.
Not denying the usefulness of knowing basic English for functioning as an administrator, Srinivasan thoroughly objects to English being a qualifying criterion to enter the civil services. “Why should the government exclude efficient administrators from the system not on their ability to read and understand English but on their lack of proficiency in the language? English speaking can be made compulsory in the training given to officers after selection,” he suggests.
Those who give the exam in their regional language and clear it can definitely comprehend English, as all questions in the exam are only in English and Hindi. Making certain questions in English of a certain standard compulsory, he says, is bound to disadvantage those from poor socio-economic backgrounds. “A common paper for all, eliminating the optional paper in the prelims, is a good idea. But the CSAT clearly disadvantages those from lower classes.”
While very few non-English speakers make it to the services, when they do get selected, they face innumerable problems during the training at the Lal Bahadur Shastri Academy, he says. “We have to struggle to understand the course which is only in English and Hindi. The faculty speaks only in the two languages and it’s almost impossible to make friends if you can’t speak English,” he says.
“Aspirants from socio-economically weaker sections most often go to government schools and they are the ones most close to the grassroots. The CSAT pattern then pushes out many who are sensitive and committed in favour of those who are proficient in English but are far less sensitive. The decision mirrors the kind of administrators our government wants to employ,” says Srinivasan.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT