Ishant Sharma seems to have lost the arrogant, Achilles-like rage of the pacer—when hit for a four or a six, he’s no longer steaming back to bowl a nasty bouncer. Recent Indian cricket is replete with cautionary tales involving men who hurled the ball fast and made it curve like a crescent, and coaches fear that Ishant too could be on that road to early cricketing perdition. “The debacle has started,” says coach Shravan Kumar. “Ishant needs to work really, really hard on his game when he returns from South Africa.”
Most cricket commentators agree that Ishant has lost pace and swing and, with them, the dread he used to inspire in the best batsmen in the world, all in a few months. But Shravan’s pronouncement has to be taken more seriously because he happens to be Ishant’s coach.
India needs Ishant; though he leaks runs in one-dayers, his record in wins is markedly better than in losses. As India fared poorly in yet another ICC event, the Champions Trophy, Ishant’s performance was distressing—three wickets in the first two games, at nearly six runs an over. At this rate, there is serious danger of him being lost to Indian cricket.
Former India allrounder Manoj Prabhakar believes India doesn’t have the right bowling coach. “I would not call Venkatesh Prasad a coach—he’s more of a baggage handler!” he says. While that may sound mean, Prabhakar poses a barrage of relevant questions: “Why’s it that no bowler has grown and learnt more after joining the Indian team? Why’s R.P. Singh bowling worse than ever before? And Praveen Kumar? Where is Sreesanth? He’s won a Test in South Africa, of all places! And Ishant was a gem handed to Prasad, why has he declined?”
Prabhakar, highly regarded by the Delhi bowlers, with whom he’d worked as a bowling coach for a season, has the diagnosis. He says Ishant’s problems are both physiological and psychological—and compounded by Prasad’s influence. “Ishant’s left shoulder is dropping at the time of delivery. It’s causing him to lose pace,” says Prabhakar. “And since Prasad bowled a good leg-cutter, it seems he’s trying to teach it to Ishant, cluttering his mind, affecting his grip and wrist position. That’s why he’s unable to swing the ball now.” All this, says Prabhakar, has made Ishant scared of being hit.
This dread of taking a bit of stick, says Shravan, inevitably alters the mechanics of a bowler’s action. This fear is particularly widespread in T20. “Every bowler must try new skills to get wickets, but in T20, the only skill that’s valued is getting dot balls,” Shravan says. “So the bowler hits the pitch hard to make it difficult for the batsmen to score—but that reduces his ability to swing the ball.”
Unsurprisingly, professional coaches are worried about what Twenty20 cricket and easy money might do to the game. “I think T20 and IPL are very bad for cricket,” Dinesh Lad, coach of the talented Rohit Sharma, says. “I think cricketers doing other stuff—like dance shows on TV—isn’t good. These distractions can’t do you any good. You should focus on cricket alone,” he adds.
These views might seem anachronistic to the fan bred in modern times, but these coaches have spent their lives teaching cricket to children in the hope of creating international players; their opinion must be heeded. “Players don’t practise as much as they did before they became international players—they just don’t have the time!” says Shravan. “And when they do, sponsors use it for promotional programmes or advertisements. The players can’t refuse, because they’re giving them crores of rupees.”
Former captain Bishan Singh Bedi blames the board for nipping talent. “They’re playing so much cricket, and the BCCI should be blamed for trying to flog players towards an early decline. Where’s the time to recover from injuries, or to learn new skills? T20 will destroy all young cricketers in the world.”
Fitness, of curse, is Indian cricket’s perennial problem. Bowlers are bowling more than ever before, in Tests, ODIs and now in the T20 leagues, which involve much travel and incredible intensity. Bedi rightly cites Glenn McGrath as a supremely fit cricketer. In his first Test, McGrath bowled 55 overs—and 50 in his last. None of our young pacemen has bowled 50. And despite the focus on young blood, it’s Sachin Tendulkar who’s been central to overseas success in the recent past—like in Australia in early 2008 and in Sri Lanka last month.
Captain M.S. Dhoni’s Midas touch owed a lot of substance to Ishant’s bowling—he’d be loath to lose it. The BCCI might, to preclude that, want to do something it has rarely done before—nurture, protect and rest Indian players, and guide them towards the summit that the aureole of early success often points to.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT