Genealogical charts of the gharana claim that the court singer during the reign of the last emperor of Delhi Bahadur Shah Zafar (1838-57)—Miyan Ajmal Khan (popularly known as Miyan Achpal)—was a representative of the Qawwal Bache gharana. His brother Ghulam Hussain and disciple Tanras Khan kept the tradition of the gharana alive. The son-in-law of Ghulam Hussain was Sangi Khan who focused his attention to sarangi playing, while the disciples of Tanras Khan kept the vocal tradition of the gharana alive. The last great doyen of the Delhi gharana, Ustad Chand Khan (1889-1980) claimed to have been related to the Qawwal Bache gharana on the maternal side and the Delhi gharana on the paternal side.
Coming to stylistic features of vocalism, it is said that it was the Qawwal Bache gharana which began
phirat, which may be translated as a free run, up and down the octave, within the confines of the raag. This new aspect of elaboration of the raag was later on adapted by the Gwalior and other gharanas. The phirat is said to have been first sung and presented by Ustad Bade Mohammad Khan. It is to be noted that this is the same person who is said to have taught the Gwalior gharana ustads Haddu and Hassu Khan, albeit indirectly! It was he who made this mode of development especially intricate, instead of taking straight runs up and down the octave. Another stalwart of the Qawwal Bache gharana, Ustad Mubarak Ali Khan is credited with the invention of
dohri or dugun ki phirat. This is the person about whom Ustad Alladiya Khan, the founder of the Jaipur-Atrauli gharana spoke very highly, going so far to say that there was no singer like Ustad Mubarak Ali Khan during his time! Similarly, the Kasur-Patiala gharana can also be traced back to the Qawwal Bache gharana as the founders— Ustads Fateh Ali and Ali Bakhsh— were disciples of Tanras Khan who in turn was the disciple of Miyan Achpal. Thus, it can be seen clearly that a number of vocal styles which are prevalent to this day can be traced back to prominent figures of the tradition in Delhi.
The Delhi gharana of tabla was founded in the early 18th century by Sidhar Khan, a
pakhawaj player in Rangile's court, and the playing style of this gharana is also known as the
band baaj. This style has clarity of sound that is a result of the initial role of the tabla as an accompaniment to vocal and instrumental music. This sharpness is achieved by playing on the
chanti or kinar.
In the 20th century, the most important tabla player of the Delhi gharana was Gamay Khan (1883-1958). His son Inam Ali Khan (1924-90) was an important tabla player of later part of the 20th century. Ustad Latif Ahmed Khan (1941-90) was a disciple of both Gamay Khan and Inam Ali Khan. More recently, Ustad Shafaat Ahmed Khan (1954-2005), the son and disciple of Chamma Khan from another branch of the gharana, and Pandit Chatur Lal (1925-65), represented the gharana very ably.
It was but natural that the revolt of 1857 and the partition of India in 1947 meant considerable movement away from Delhi in search of alternate centres of patronage. Tanras Khan moved to Hyderabad after the tumultuous events in 1857 and stayed there until his death in 1890. After partition, quite a few artists went over to Pakistan and the Delhi gharana is represented by Ustad Nasiruddin Saami in Pakistan. The current
khalifa of the Delhi gharana is Ustad Iqbal Ahmad Khan while the khalifa of the Qawwal Bacche gharana is Meraj Ahmed Nizami Qawwal. The sons of Taan Samrat Ustad Naseer Ahmed Khan—Tanvir and Imran Ahmed—are carrying forward the gharana's legacy of vocal music. The tradition of sitar playing within the gharana, which was brought into vogue by Ustad Zafar Ahmed Khan, is ably represented by his son and disciple Ustad Saeed Zafar Khan. The tradition of tabla is also being carried forward by exponents of the gharana such as Ustad Faiyaz Khan, Ustad Rafiuddin Sabri and Pandit Subhash
This article originally appeared in Delhi City Limits, August 2007
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT