What a grim Diwali we’ve just had. Everywhere doom and gloom mounts. The depressing mood in Delhi was heightened by the pollution which hung from the skies like a dark cloud. You could see the despondency on people’s faces as they went about their customary Diwali shopping without discernible enthusiasm.
Could things get worse? It does not seem possible, but don’t count on it. Those who rule us and those who are getting ready to rule us, pretend all is normal or almost normal given the “international situation”. It is the media which is spreading the negativity. To respond to these charges is a waste of time. Either our leaders don’t step out of their air-conditioned cars and Lutyens bungalows or they are pathologically delusional. The crooks are catching the crooks and claiming they are “cleaning the system”. One doesn’t know whether to cry or laugh.
People like me in the media can no longer get up on our soap-box and preach morality. Our own house is dangerously dysfunctional, riddled with venality. For a long time, corruption in the media has been either ignored or suppressed by the media themselves. At an Editors Guild meeting six months ago, I proposed that all editors voluntarily declare their assets and these be regularly updated and put up on the guild’s website. Nothing happened. Some of us have been repeatedly warning that external self-regulation for the print media can no longer be put off. Alas, each paper insists on regulating itself through its own corrections/clarifications column. Now, it is hardly a secret that editors hate acknowledging they have published fabricated news; even if a correction is printed, it is tucked away on an inside page. We vilify a person on the front page, and put the regret on page 17! In the past few days, the director-general of the BBC, who is also its editor-in-chief, resigned taking responsibility for a mistake the BBC had made. How many editors-in-chief in India would do that? The print media is drinking in the Last Chance Saloon. It knows it is drinking in the Last Chance Saloon, yet does nothing. Do we have a death wish?
Full disclosure: Most of my life’s savings and a few investments are in HSBC. I moved to the bank nearly seven years ago because I have known the country head, Naina Lal Kidwai, from my Pioneer days. She is well in with the political movers and shakers roaming the capital and I can confirm she is a terrific lady. How she got into this mess is as bewildering as Rajat Gupta’s criminality. I pray Naina happens to be just incompetent and ignorant about what was going on in her bank.
A friend who used to work for a foreign bank told me Arvind Kejriwal and Prashant Bhushan were spot on. Although he didn’t know about the sordid money laundering in HSBC, his bank had people on the staff specifically tasked to facilitate the opening of secret Swiss Bank accounts. The facilitators acted as middle-men by providing the appropriate contacts while the gentlemen from Dubai would fly down, collect the loot from the client—and there the role of the bank would end. According to my informant, the bank made obscene sums of money on each deal. When he told his bank about the activities of these nefarious people, he was told to mind his own business. Frightening!
Reading Ramachandra Guha’s instructive and entertaining piece, part of his new book Patriots and Partisans (Penguin) in Outlook last week, I was reminded of my own experience. The bulk of letters I have received from the same tribe in the past 17 years, if not more, have been along similar lines. My traducers, however, besides being upper caste, humourless and resident overseas (mainly the US) also displayed weird sexual fantasies. I understand they are known as bestiality in the trade. My critics wanted my dog Editor to do perverse carnal things to me, and me to him. That is what they thought I was fit for. Frequently, these worthies would include Mrs Mehta in the perversion. Speculating about this menage-a-trois presumably gave them enormous thrill. These gents did not know Editor has been neutered and therefore has no sexual impulse. Were the letters abominably composed? Some, but most if not literary masterpieces, were quite acceptable and could have been printed in Outlook. Unfortunately, I did not preserve them. After sharing them with other editors at the morning conference, they would go into the bin. We had a good laugh—something my fault-finders were incapable of.
Some of Editor’s fans have asked why I don’t mention him in my diary anymore. Well, I thought he is passe. Anyway, he is growing old and not making any news. If he does anything disgraceful, I’ll keep you informed.
I was reliably informed that Girish Karnad’s next target is a third-rate playwright called W. Shakespeare.
Vinod Mehta is editorial chairman, Outlook, and its founding editor-in-chief; E-mail your diarist: vmehta AT outlookindia.com
This refers to Vinod Mehta’s Delhi Diary (Nov 26). For all the talk about being liberal and open-minded, people like Mehta and Ramachandra Guha seem totally incapable of writing anything without mentioning caste (“My traducers, however, besides being upper caste....”). As far as I know, critics of VM rarely mention his caste.
I love Mr Mehta’s brand of witticisms—politicians are pathologically delusional; Indian editors don’t move an inch to make public their assets; Editor has no sexual impulse.... But beware, Karnad, in all likelihood, may target you as a third-rate journalist!
V.N.K. Murti, Pattambi
Unfortunately, Shakespeare is not an evil Hindu. So Karnad’s secular noise meter will remain in silent mode.
Countless readers think Karnad is not a great writer. Does that make Karnad any less ‘great’?
V. Iyengar, Hyderabad
Apropos Vinod Mehta’s Delhi Diary (Nov 26), one wonders if there’s one area Indians can claim to be honest in: we are the worst kind of hypocrites. Still, Mera Bharat Mahan!
T. Santhanam, on e-mail
Sir, you are a wonderful writer. On TV, though, your speech becomes a caricature of your prose. Please stop appearing on the idiot box.
Sudhir Kumar Bisht, Delhi
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
There are countless readers who think that Girish Karnad is NOT a great writer. Does that make Karnad any less ‘great’? Mr. Karnad, get the drift?
VINOD MEHTA >> Full disclosure: Most of my life’s savings and a few investments are in HSBC. I moved to the bank nearly seven years ago because I have known the country head, Naina Lal Kidwai, from my Pioneer days
Good to hear a piece of "FULL DISCLOSURE" from your esteemed self . May you also disclose, in the interest of probity and fairness and ethics, regarding whether the Raheja Group also had the mentioned business dealings in HSBC? Now that, WOULD BE REAL FULL DISCLOSURE (whether trutful or not is a different matter).....
Rakhal >> But you can write such things about brahmins. And Jews. And you will be hailed for your open mindedness.
he can write anything about brahmins, jews, or any caste. But can he write a single word about one Mr Rajan Raheja or his family?
VINOD MEHTA >> My traducers, however, besides being upper caste, humourless and resident overseas (mainly the US) also displayed weird sexual fantasies.
Mr vinod Mehta, can you please tell us whether you have some magical machine which helps you to find out the Caste details of your traducers? Or is it that everyone who mails you/spams you declares that he or she belongs to so and so caste of so and so region of india?
Waiting to hear from you on this.
Now I know Vinod too has some Journalist soul left in him. Good to read articles - [Vinod the Journalist has to say].
Alas he has stopped being the mouthpiece of Congress for quite some time.
Now I really feel it was worth subscribing for Outlook.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT