...and Management 101
The walls around his house—and life—are higher than the usual, designed to keep away prying eyes. But on occasion the air of secrecy around Kalanidhi Maran, the billionaire founder of the Sun Group, does drop. In 2006, he was fronting a roadshow in Mumbai for the initial public offering (IPO) of Sun TV. As an analyst who attended remembers, at some point Kalanidhi got so irritated with the barrage of disconcerting questions coming at him that he burst out in Tamil (a polite translation went like this “Get lost, invest if you feel like it, I don’t really give a damn.”)
As news spread through the meeting room, people got up and left. But regardless of the display of arrogance, the IPO was a success—Maran raised some Rs 600 crore from it. All this matters now because his latest acquisition (IPL’s Hyderabad franchise) might finally bring Kalanidhi into the public eye. There is no evidence that he is crazy about cricket. Kalanidhi is not the kind to do business deals on the golf course, and probably rarely uses the gym at his bungalow on the tony Boat Club road in Chennai.
So it’ll be a change for the many observers who view the 48-year-old media mogul via the prism of politics. “Sun TV’s business is cyclical...not based on anything else but politics,” says a market analyst. This is a common perception—Kalanidhi’s links to the DMK (his late father was the former Union industries minister Murasoli Maran, a favourite nephew of DMK chief M. Karunanidhi) have given him the leg up to where he is now. “His companies did well under DMK rule,” says political analyst Gnani. But how did he continue to prosper even when the DMK was not in power? Gnani adds, “Don’t forget, the DMK has been part of the Centre for the last 15 years.”
At the same time, there are many who insist that Kalanidhi is just a savvy businessman who likes fishing in troubled (though familiar) waters—and does it well. For a man “whose life starts and ends with business”, buying into a cricket franchise at a time when six of the nine other franchise owners are struggling to break even might seem suicidal but, says a source, “He thinks big, does his homework, is armed with great intelligence and is very hands-on.” His media-to-aviation group reported revenues of Rs 1,832 crore (for 2011-12) and a profit of Rs 694 crore. An IPL franchise, then, seems like small change.
In fact, while Kalanidhi’s middle name is circumspection, it was up to his CFO, V.C. Unnikrishnan, to corner the bragging rights. Asked how the group would fund the team, he laughed, “We earn profits! We will pay the BCCI through internal accruals.” Kalanidhi has no debt, in itself a big deal in these days of massive leverage. The core strength of the media group has been capturing distribution. And in these troubled times for aviation, his SpiceJet has recently shown a profit. Recently, Maran and wife Kaveri, who is joint group MD, were listed as the second-highest paid executives in India with a package of Rs 57.01 crore each.
“His political links are overrated,” says a close observer of Kalanidhi. His company did not fold when a feud erupted in the Karunanidhi clan with the Maran brothers (after his paper Dinakaran published a survey in May ’07 dismissing Karunanidhi’s elder son and Union minister M.K. Azhagiri’s chances as a possible political heir). And it’s not as if Kalanidhi did not flex his clout then—he even cosied up to CM Jayalalitha to send the right warning signals. A reunion happened in December ’08 because Karunanidhi and Kalanidhi realised that they brought to the table strengths that should be combined rather than divided.
Last October, Kalanidhi and Dayanidhi were raided by the CBI—the allegation is that in ’06 Dayanidhi, as then Union telecom minister, leaned on Aircel owner Sivasankaran to part with his holding in the company to Malaysia-based Anandhakrishnan, who is close to the Marans. Sivasankaran claimed that Anandhakrishnan, as a thank-you gesture, invested Rs 900 crore in the Sun Group. That case is still pending. There were other bruising battles too—it took almost a year of litigation before Tata Sky and Sun TV reached an out-of-court settlement on pricing and distribution in ’07 (there were many insinuations again about Dayanidhi’s role in this matter).
That Kalanidhi now sees himself as a businessman first and foremost is illustrated by Sun TV network concluding an agreement with the Tamil Nadu government-owned Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd recently. Initially, Sun TV was not on board—but Maran was able to finally (and after much negotiation) convince the state that viewer demand and revenues needs would be met by a deal.
Incidentally, when he was younger, Kalanidhi did not shy away from the spotlight. While doing his degree in Loyola College, he became the student’s union chairman and led an agitation on the Sri Lankan Tamils issue. “Now if you talk politics, he might say a few things, but will steer the conversation to business territory,” says an analyst who’s met him over the years.
There are stories that Karunanidhi offered the DMK office (Anna Arivalayam), a prime piece of property on Anna Salai, as collateral when Sun TV started with an investment of $86,000 bank loan. Whether that is apocryphal or not, what is true is that not only did Sun TV debut from Anna Arivalayam, it was allowed to use the DMK’s ‘Rising Sun’ symbol that gave it a certain brand equity.
“He has an excellent power base in Delhi. Nobody’s been able to touch him,” says a source. Last July, the media magnate was summoned by the police after a Salem-based film distributor complained that Sun Pictures cheated him of Rs 83 lakh. Kalanidhi quietly made the case go away after paying off the distributor. However, his close associate at the time, Sun Pictures COO Hansraj Saxena, who was arrested in several cases of cheating, is no more a part of his charmed circle, a collection of college buddies who work at high levels within the group. Kalanidhi reportedly began hiring professionals only after he acquired SpiceJet in 2010.
As an employer, he is believed to be a hard task master. “For the outside world, these companies may be professionally managed, but the market views it differently,” says M.S. Anand, president, Investor Relations Society. As far as the stock markets are concerned, the share prices are ‘volatile’ because investors believe political connections do have a bearing on their fortunes.
Ask Kalanidhi and he’ll insist he’s a visionary. Accepting the TiECon 2009 ‘Entrepreneur of the Year’ award, his much-quoted speech had these words: “If I’m going to follow the herd, I’ll be one among the crowd.... All my steps are calculated, I’m not going blindly by intuition.” Given that anything can happen—in business, as well as politics—those are brave words from the billionaire.
Apropos Costa Del Sol (Nov 12), those telecom billions little brother Dayanidhi managed for him had to be invested somewhere. So let’s spice it up, pick up an airline, and maybe a cricket team. As he himself said, “all my steps are calculated”. It’s almost a villain’s line from one of those garish Tamil movies he makes.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
1. ) I dont know if it is to do with the fact that the authoress is a feminist, but the photographer has almost forgotten to capture half of Kalanidhis picture in favour of someone prettier.
2. ) The Sun family is mega-big and growing, not because of decent business acumen ( which business in India does have that? ), but because of political clout and a non-functioning judiciary.
What good of eduction when they abuse power and garner wealth?!No wonder Indians prefer local crooks to foreign ones.It is a shame and he should introspect.In the modern world nobody asks how you made your money but how much?!Kalanidhi Maran must introspect and see if all his education only made him a sophisticated crook or other wise.This billionaire but for his connections would have at the best remained a millionaire not a billionaire.
Sadly we have a society that has great respect for wealth making every Indian run behind wealth and wealthy
The financials look good but in a family managed business, the average shareholder gets only what is set aside for her.
As a media baron, and one with a long reach with deep cash chests to back him, no one expected that this article would either be diferent or say anything to the discredit of Kalanidhi Maran. The writer is obviously playing the old game of mutual back scratching. But why no mention of the reportedly illegal Telephone Exchange set up by his brother Dayanidhi to serve SUN TV exclusively causing hundreds of crores of loss to the exchequer? Or does the writer really believe that Kalanidhi is saintly and innocent and only Dayanidhi should answer?
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT