“And here’s one more reason to do well,” intoned Mahendra Singh Dhoni, “you might get on to the cover of the Wisden India Almanack.” The two players who did make it on the cover of the inaugural issue, Rahul Dravid and Virat Kohli, saw it in somewhat personal terms. “I doubt if I will be on the cover again,” said Dravid, who retired from the game last year. “I am honoured to share the space with Rahul bhai,” said a diplomatic Kohli.
It is a good time for the Almanack to make its debut in India, with the national team in transition, and the golden era winding down. There is something exciting about change, about recording a generational shift; about reminding ourselves, as C.D. Gopinath said, that phases of victory and defeat come in cycles. Gopinath, a sprightly, articulate 82, was a member of India’s first Test-winning side. His stories of how players on national duty in the 1950s were billeted in train carriages and in the houses of fans shocked a later player, Sourav Ganguly, who has known nothing but five-star hospitality since he began playing.
The original Wisden first appeared in the UK in 1864, a significant year in the history of the game. Overarm bowling was legalised that year, while W.G. Grace made his debut. Wisden was a first-class cricketer who once claimed all 10 wickets in an innings, and was on the 1859 tour—the first-ever cricket tour—to the US and Canada. He had a rough crossing, though, and suggested to the ship’s captain that perhaps he should use the heavy roller on the Atlantic to calm it down.
The Rank Turner Ganguly’s cry for an Indian coach “who understands Indian cricket better” than any foreigner raised a cheer. But it is a tough call. In a pool among players with over 100 Test match appearances and with the experience of having played all over the world, an older Indian coach begins with a handicap. How do you tell Virender Sehwag to turn up for practice? Then there is the problem of personal biases. On a tour of Pakistan, when a Maharashtrian was coach, a player from Maharashtra made the trip because the coach said he would “look after him”.
If it must be an Indian at the helm, then it has to be a relatively newer former player who knows about the non-cricketing aspects—the pressures, the travel, the media, the board politics for instance. All that even before his ability to manage the job comes into the equation. The foreign coach comes without baggage, fully aware. As John Wright wrote in his book, when India win, there will be a limousine waiting for him at the airport but when they lose, he has to find his own taxi.
“Why don’t you take over?” I asked Ravi Shastri seated nearby. “I love to coach,” said the player, commentator, columnist, IPL enthusiast, “If coaching began and ended with talking to the players on the field, demonstrating and strategising, then I am all for it. But there’s so much more.”
Neither a ‘yes’ nor a ‘no’, then.
Phantom Image The Wisden India Almanack was put together in a haunted building. Eyewitness accounts claim to have seen a ghost late night in the editor’s chair, watching cricket on television. For a while it was assumed that it was the editor himself indulging in some ghost-writing till someone realised that the apparition was present even on the nights the editor was not in town. Even ghosts, it was acknowledged, cannot be in two places simultaneously. So who was the ghost?
I believe it was John Wisden himself, making sure all was well and that the number of leg-byes in the scorecards tallied with the actual figures. Wisden wasn’t the first editor of the almanac—W.H. Knight is credited with that honour. But what he said in his first edition holds good still, “In offering our first edition of the almanack to the patrons of the Noble Game, we have taken great pains to collect a certain amount of information, which we trust will prove interesting to all those that take pleasure in this glorious pastime.”
The Premiere League The IPL question continues to intrigue. With its colour, noise and razzmatazz, it is an American sport accidentally invented in India. Like pulp fiction, it demands a different standard of criticism. If Test cricket is War and Peace, Twenty20 is the grocery list. Yet each is important to its constituency.
Today, the first edition of Wisden is worth a small fortune. Could, years from now, the first edition of the India Almanack put some collector's grandchildren through college?
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
There is nothing about Chennai in this whole article. Rename accordingly
The Paid News peddlers aka Outlook do not have anything substantial to say, why do you bore your readers with this meaningless drivel, instead substitute it with some great article from likes of Prakash Pandey et al on why Rahul Gandhi as PM will lead India(and therefore Chennai) straight into the 23rd century !!
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT