Sulks and Smiles
With Mulayam Singh Yadav making blatant moves to position himself as an alternative to the Congress and BJP in recent weeks, CM Jayalalitha is also sharpening her PR skills for the political road ahead. Last week, on successive days (Saturday and Sunday), she met and made nice with President Pranab Kumar Mukherjee and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The fact that her party did not vote for Pranabda in the July Presidential poll or that she has blitzed the PM with strong letters since she became CM did not come in the way.
On the other hand, DMK chief M Karunanidhi, who played a crucial role in Pranabda being chosen, was nowhere to be seen. In fact, Pranabda had started his Presidential campaign at a lunch thrown by Karunanidhi on June 30, but the patriarch did not meet him when he came here last week on his first visit outside Delhi as President. Even if protocol dictated that the patriarch should meet the President— and not the other way around as has been the case all these years— there was no such meeting. Karunanidhi reportedly called off the meeting with Pranabda at Raj Bhavan at the last minute. He did not go nor did he send any representative to the Chennai airport on Sunday when the PM passed through on his way to Sriharikota although Jayalalitha prominently received Dr Singh with a shimmering “ponnadai” (shawl).
It must have annoyed him when his son, M. K. Stalin, and DMK MP T. R. Baalu went to Raj Bhavan to meet the President but had to cool their heels for 30 minutes because Jayalalitha was already there. No wonder a DMK leader grumbled, “We had extended whole-hearted support for Mukherjee. But after the Presidential poll, the Congress has not been treating us well.”
Far from Smooth
The Congress-DMK equation has not been exactly rocky but has seen several bumps on the road in the last few years. It’s going through yet another rocky patch now.
It’s not only the trips here by the two heads of state that has exposed the cracks in the Congress-DMK alliance, the Kudankulam issue too has widened the seeming rift between the two parties. The state Congress president, B. S. Gnanadesikan, in keeping with the official party line on nuclear energy, has been critical “of the false propaganda of anti-nuclear activists.” But Karunanidhi has hit back saying, “No one should try and divide the people and the protestors.” Saying that people whisking off People’s Movement Against Nuclear Energy (PMANE)’s S. P. Udaykumar (to a secret location just as he was about to surrender to the police) is a manifestation that the agitation has widespread support from the people, Karunanidhi says: “He (Gnanadesikan) should impress upon the centre to hold talks with the protestors.”
The octogenarian is also piqued that Gnanadesikan praised Jayalalitha saying she had used the right phrase “Maya valai” (web of deceit) to describe villagers being in thrall of PMANE leaders who have kept the agitation against the Kudankulam Nuclear Plant simmering for over a year. Karunanidhi showed his pique, saying Gnanadesikan should “comment and act” responsibly befitting the leader of a state Congress unit!
One more Round
Pique seems to be in abundant supply under Karunanidhi's own roof with the latest outbreak of hostilities between his sons, Stalin and Azhagiri. The former is surely and steadily cementing his bid to take over from his father while the latter is just as surely and steadily losing his grip within the party but is not about to concede. Azhagiri is reportedly upset that no one in the family has given him moral support although his son, Dayanidhi, is facing arrest after the granite firm is which he was a partner was found to have flouted several rules. According to a former Madurai collector, U. Sagayam, a Rs 16000 crore granite scam has been played out in the state.
Stalin is leaving no stone unturned to show he is the boss and the Muperum Vizha on September 15— where the DMK celebrates the birth anniversary of its founder C N Annadurai and Dravida Kazhagam founder Periyar— is being fashioned as his show. To the extent that organizers of the event (Stalin’s supporters) have not even provided seats for Azhagiri and step-sister Kanimozhi on the dais. In 2010, when the DMK was in power, Azhagiri had stayed away from the Nagercoil event leading to tongues wagging. Now Stalin’s supporters want to see that his possible no-show will not take away from any credit from their “thalapathy”.
Azhagiri’s simmering resentment manifested in a clash this week between his and Stalin’s supporters at a meeting to condemn AIADMK rule and the alleged corruption at Madurai corporation. The clash was triggered when K. Esakkumuthu— who was suspended some months ago when he boycotted Stalin’s meeting in Madurai as part of the “thalapathy’s” statewide efforts to select members for the DMK’s youth wing— was called to the stage by Azhagiri’s supporters. Stalin’s supporters objected, leading to the clash in which Esakkumuthu injured his leg. The anti-corruption meet against the Jayalalitha government was wound up in 10 minutes.
In the absence of the missing Udayakumar, Arvind Kejriwal has come in and earlier conclusions that the agitation would peter out in the former’s absence has been proved wrong by thousands of people holding “jal satyagraha”. Udaykumar who had met CM Jayalalitha last year with an appeal to scrap the project and counted her as being on his side is a disappointed man today. “I feel let down,” he told the media before going AWOL. At a time when the people believed that a political leader who was really concerned about Tamils had come to power, she suddenly changed her stance and let the people down on this serious issue, he said. But Jayalalitha has her own compulsions. The state is going through one of its worst ever power crises, producing only 7000 mw as against a normal demand of 10,000 mw and a peak hour demand of 12,000 mw. Jayalalitha who brought down load shedding from two hours to one hour in Chennai city on June 2 this year (and halved it in the rest of the state), might re-impose longer power cuts next month with wind energy which had added substantially to the power kitty all but disappearing. Her hope that Kudankulam will mop up some of the deficit is looking more and more nebulous although the Apex Court refused to stay the loading of nuclear fuel (the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board had given the green signal for loading fuel on August 10 and upheld by the Madras High Court after it was challenged) at the Kudankulam Power Plant this week. Her hope that the centre would agree to her demand that 925 mw from the two units at KKNP be given to the state has also been nixed.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
"Karunanidhi reportedly called off the meeting with Pranabda at Raj Bhavan at the last minute." ....."It must have annoyed him when his son, M. K. Stalin, and DMK MP T. R. Baalu went to Raj Bhavan to meet the President but had to cool their heels for 30 minutes because Jayalalitha was already there."
Does Karunanidhi expect, the President to send the CM Jayalalitha out of the room so that his son Stalin and TR Baalu can get in. Should the CM wait outside to get back into the meeting again?
This old BRAT and his robber baron family have done enough damage both to Tamil Nadu and our Nation. It is time that each one of his family members is brought to justice and their enormous swindle taken back from them. They all deserve to spend the rest of their time in jail and not with the President of India.... The headlines should not read
"President of India holds meeting with the 1.75 lakh crore looters"
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT