And “north Indians” and “pseudo” Tamils like myself, how can you go wrong with a name spelt as “Alagiri”? I can imagine if you failed the banana (vaazhapazham) test, but Alagiri? Come on!
Switch a party, call a bypoll
Usually by-elections to the assembly are caused by the incumbent MLA's death. Three by-polls held earlier, but after May 2006 when the DMK came to power, were caused because the sitting MLAs died. Thanks to Azhagiri, the DMK won all.
But, of the five by-polls slated for August 18, only one by-election at Srivaikuntam is because its MLA (Congress’ D Selvaraj) died. The rest have been caused because of defections by MLAs just before the Lok Sabha elections in May.
Illayankudi is going to the polls because its MLA S Raja Kannapan resigned from the DMK to join the AIADMK. Thondamathur and Cumbum have by-elections because their MLAs, M Kannapan and N Ramakrishnan respectively, of the MDMK ditched the party to join the DMK. Bargur has an election because its AIADMK MLA M Thambidurai resigned the seat after being elected to Parliament recently. And since Jayalalitha has decided to boycott the polls, the seat is up for grabs.
Next up for by-elections will be Tiruchendur with its MLA Anitha R Radhakrishnan all set to join the DMK. He’s already getting the red carpet treatment in the DMK – he has met CM Karunanidhi, dy CM Stalin and shared a stage with union minister Azhagiri – after he was turfed out by AIADMK supremo Jayalalitha, There might also be a by-election from Mylapore whose MLA S Ve Shekhar, theatre personality, has been shown the door by amma after she found him hobnobbing with the DMK.
But unlike Radhakrishnan, no one in the DMK is breaking any doors down for Shekhar even if he has managed a meeting with Karunanidhi. Shekhar had these brave words after he was thrown out: “I am thankful to Madam Jayalalithaa and God for relieving me of the mental pain that I have been undergoing for the past two years… from the next session of the Assembly, I can function freely to serve the people of my constituency.” No one is taking bets on him, the only other Brahmin leader apart from Jayalalitha herself, getting a ticket in 2011! So, it’s premature optimism for a lightweight like him to think of a second term.
You scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours
So what is the real reason Anitha Radhakrishnan switched parties? Because he can make the grafts case, filed by the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), go away? The probe on his allegedly possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income is complete. But he has not been charged yet.
But, a former colleague in the AIADMK O Paneerelvam (who was CM briefly) is in hot water already with the DVAC filing a 1,417-page charge sheet against him on corruption charges before the Chief Judicial Magistrate court at Periakulam last week. The charge sheet was also filed against six members of his family.
The police had searched the houses of Paneerselvam and his relatives in 2006 after filing a case against them.
The DVAC was all set to seek the sanction of the assembly speaker to prosecute Radhakrishnan under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Radhakrishnan may have pre-empted that by taking the road well travelled. Sample this: Jennifer Chandran, a former fisheries minister in the AIADMK regime, was charged with corruption, but once she shifted loyalties, the cases were put on ice. Similar was the case of Indira Kumari, also a minister in Jayalalithaa’s regime (1991-1996). She joined the DMK and cases against her slowed down.
Aladi Aruna was in DMK when the AIADMK went after him. But he joined the BJP and the cases retreated because the “party with a difference” and Amma were on the same side. In fact, none of the corruption cases filed against DMK ministers by the then AIADMK government have reached the courts. So do you still think that cops are not weapons in the hands of our politicians? Think again!
Azhagiri quote: Anitha Radhakrishnan was happy when he entered Gopalapuram (residence of CM Karunanidhi) easily whereas he was afraid of going into Poes Garden (residence of Jayalalitha).
Hoist with her own petard
It may not be fair or even politically correct but I am amused when cops get caught with their pants down, speaking metaphorically of course. For years, the aam aadmi has been a victim of the biscuit bandit – so called because the culprit gives a spiked biscuit making the victim unconscious and then hightails it with gold/ money – and the cops have not done anything.
Now, hopefully they will after a CBI inspector Premalatha, travelling from Mumbai to Chennai, was relieved of her gold earrings and chain (12 sovereigns) and Rs 10,000 after a well dressed stranger got in at Cuddapah into her First AC compartment, chatted her up, offered her a cold drink and the next thing she knew was when sweepers found her unconscious.
By the way, the railway has been running a campaign about the biscuit bandit gang from Cuddapah. My question is: After all her training at the CBI, how gullible was she that she fell for a conman no matter how well-dressed he was? A minor question: how did an inspector get entitled to travel by I AC?
In another case, five cops including a deputy superintendent of police who came in mufti were thrashed and locked up by villagers of Melveeranam, near Vellore, because they mistook them for goondas! An honest mistake, I believe, because the cops came with a person who obviously was trying to con a local in a land case. After being incarcerated for three hours, the cops were rescued by their colleagues.
Last heard, the cops had sworn always to wear a uniform while on duty...
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT