The authorities too have played out their roles on expected lines. The Harkat-ul-Jehad-al-Islami (HUJI), a Bangladesh-based terrorist group, has been named. Bilal, aka Shahid, a former resident of the old city (see box), has yet again been accused of having masterminded the operation from a foreign country. The foreign hand at work again? Perhaps the administration believes there is a comfort zone in blaming groups and individuals abroad, making the average citizen feel safer. It also appears to make the problem go away.But the most refreshing change in the response to the Hyderabad blasts has come from the citizens themselves. No one here is fooling themselves that some Bangladeshis spent days and nights plotting to kill Indian civilians in Hyderabad. Most people believe the origins of the ghastly act lie in the city itself. They also see it as being intricately linked to the complex political matrix of Hyderabad, particularly the old city.For all its glossy depiction as a booming cyber city, the sheen of upmarket Hyderabad or the peace of the plush homes in Banjara hills does not rub off on the old city, where a quarter of the population lives in little lanes and bylanes.
K. Balagopal, a civil rights activist and lawyer who has defended both Naxalites and Muslims, has no doubt that the origins of the blasts are local. There is a seething anger in the old city, he says, and unemployment is rampant. "Hyderabad Muslims have always been very traditional though that in itself is no reason for terrorism. But the problem is that those who do not have the means to leave the old city are trapped in politics where the only way they learn to express their anger is through a religious idiom." He says it is known that in old Hyderabad and Nalgonda district some youth have been attracted to the ideology of radical Islam. He feels the Muslim anger is justified although the manner in which it is now being expressed by some is dangerous for the entire community.That there are two Hyderabads can be illustrated by the varying response to the two terror strikes in the city this year. When the blast went off in Mecca Masjid on May 18, killing nine, local residents stoned the police because of the uneasy relations between Muslims and the administration. The death toll would have been higher if a second bomb had gone off. Instead, five more were killed in police firing. But the Mecca Masjid blast was seen as a wholly Muslim affair, by them, against them, amongst them. It was not seen as an assault on Hyderabad. Balagopal points out: "No group called for a strike then as the
BJP did this time. Sadly, even Muslims see themselves this way, as cut off from the mainstream. But the August 25 twin blasts were seen as an attack on mainstream Hyderabad."It is not as if all Muslims are backward and poor. On the contrary, the vestiges of an educated ruling class from the days of the Nizam's rule has ensured the impressive figure of 8.4 per cent Muslims in government jobs against an overall population of 9 per cent in Andhra Pradesh. Hyderabad city has about 40 per cent Muslims. Not all are ghettoised. There are many progressive elements such as the family that runs the city's oldest Urdu newspaper Siyasat. Editor Zahid Ali Khan, whose family has also been traditionally involved in social work, has now taken the bold step of trying to form a front to take on the MIM. The other leading Urdu daily, Munsif, too has joined in along with the Left parties and efforts are on to rope in the
TDP. This will be first serious challenge to the MIM.For his efforts, MIM goons threw garbage on Zahid Ali Khan. He says: "If they can attack me, what do you think they will do to the average resident of the old city? It is because of the MIM that Muslims in the old city are trapped and some have taken recourse to unacceptable methods that can only shatter the joint composite culture of Hyderabad. " In the next room, his younger bother Zaheer Ali Khan, managing editor of the paper, says that for three days he has been pondering over an article about how the nuclear deal will really make India a target of international terror groups for whom we are really still not a priority. That is, he believes, the current series of bomb blasts is not the handiwork of outsiders but have local origins.
CM YSR and home minister Patil with a victim
P. Madhu, a CPI(M) MP trying to create an anti-MIM front, also believes the roots of the terror strike lie in the old city. "The atmosphere in old Hyderabad is congenial for a terrorist group to set up base. There are no democratic institutions left there. There is no municipality, no revenue collection, nothing but MIM rule. And if people are so scared of the MIM, do you think they will have the courage to come forward with information about individuals or groups that are inclined towards terror?" Moreover, he says the Congress is so edgy about retaining MIM support, police officers who would crack down on the party's goons have all been removed. "How will the police investigate when the message is, leave MIM alone?" Even Naseem Arifi, editor of the pro-MIM Urdu paper Ehtemaad, says: "Till the '90s there were riots to divide people. Now there are dhamakas. I don't doubt that some local could have sheltered terrorists." But he sees the MIM as the solution, not the problem. Akbaruddin Owaisi, one of the two brothers who have inherited the party from their father Salahuddin, says Muslim frustration began after Babri Masjid; then the many riots where they were killed but never got any justice. He then narrates an incident: two days before the August 25 blasts, two Muslim boys were picked up by the police, tortured, electrocuted in the genitalia to try and make them confess for the Mecca Masjid blast. When the police got nothing out of the boys, they let them go.The MIM took the boys to the AP chief minister. "If you carry on like this, pick up innocents, kill Muslims in fake encounters you will create terrorists," Akbaruddin says. As for the charge that the MIM brand of politics only creates conditions for terror groups to set up base, Akbaruddin retorts: "They can't stand the fact that there is a party left to protect Muslims and fight for their rights. This has happened because the government did not wake up after the Mecca Masjid blast and never investigated it seriously because only Muslims had died. We want terrorists caught but we will not stand by and watch innocent residents of the old city being booked."Yet none of the Owaisis live in old Hyderabad. Akbaruddin himself has a huge plush white house with pink tiles in a posh part of Hyderabad. The historic old city spread across the Charminar is no longer an area people choose to live in if they have a choice. It is the doomed and the damned, trapped in lanes they perhaps always wanted to escape, who are liable to take to inhumane ways of getting their back on society.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT