By 1986, Lalit Modi, with a cocaine possession and abduction conviction behind him, was through with everyman’s gilded dreamland—the United States of America. Yet to turn 23, having graduated from Duke University, Lalit sought permission from court to return to India on health grounds. Getting away wasn’t easy—in lieu of being jailed, he had been placed under a five-year probation and ordered to do 100 hours’ community service. But, as on other occasions, he got by with a bit of help from influential family friends and the liberal use of money. Later, he returned to India to join the family business.
In the late 1980s, a woman, too, had winged her way from distant Nigeria, staying for a while in a Gulf country before landing in India. Her name: Minal Sagrani. A svelte, charming, divorced woman whose family had suffered serious business setbacks, she was known to the family of industrialist K.K. Modi, Lalit’s father and the son of Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi, who established the industrial township of Modinagar in western Uttar Pradesh. She was in fact a friend of Lalit’s mother. Who in the Modi family could have ever thought that Lalit and Minal—said to be nine years older to him—were fated for each other. They married in Mumbai on October 17, 1991, and the family hosted a reception in Delhi on October 19.
Family game Lalit’s marriage with Minal spawned the connections that now rule IPL. Here, with daughter Aliya and son Ruchir.
Minal and Lalit’s wedding spawned a tapestry of kinship which was, in the new millennium, to dominate the Indian Premier League. To this marriage can be traced some of Modi’s current troubles, as also his formidable clout of the last few years. The reason: through Minal, he acquired relatives in Nigeria—the Chellarams, who now have a stake in the Rajasthan Royals; through the marriage of Minal’s daughter (from her first marriage) to the Burmans, the owners of Dabur, he acquired a stepson (Gaurav Burman) who has a large slice of the online, digital and mobile rights of IPL. Also, Gaurav’s brother Mohit is part-owner of Kings XI Punjab.
But this club of relatives wouldn’t have come to dominate the IPL—or grabbed headlines through the last fortnight—had Modi not acquired financial and political clout through his proximity to former Rajasthan chief minister and BJP leader Vasundhararaje Scindia (Outlook had reported this a year ago).
Lalit had met Minal in London, where she had come to stay after her husband was jailed for a scam in Saudi Arabia. He fell in love with her. A friend of the family says that she was looking for a husband at the time and was a regular visitor to the Modis’ house in Maharani Bagh, Delhi. “She was very sweet on Lalit’s mother and used to visit and stay with them at their house,” a source who has known the Modis for several decades said. The family was opposed to their betrothal, tried to persuade Lalit against it, and felt betrayed by Minal.
Never one to rethink and retreat after taking a plunge—a trait now reflected through his refusal to resign as IPL commissioner—Lalit wasn’t swayed. In an interview last year, K.K. Modi recalled those days and said, “He made it clear that he would marry only this friend of my wife, no one else.” It was at this time that another trait of Lalit was witnessed, a trait on display through the current controversy—his uncanny ability to pit people against each other to his own advantage. “He managed to get his grandmother Dayawati Modi on his side,” says a source close to the family. “It was she who persuaded the family to let him go ahead.” And though the Modis were “deeply disturbed and hurt that their son had got married to his mother’s friend”, they hosted a reception at the Taj Man Singh Hotel in Delhi.
Power game Lalit and Kavita Chellaram with Vasundhara
In public, both parties kissed and made up, but sources who’ve known Modi all through his business career say his parents never forgave him for his marriage with their friend. He was not made an integral part of the family business thereafter, though he does hold a designation with his family firm Godfrey Phillips. He was provided with a car and an allowance and he shifted to Mumbai and lived in a house belonging to Minal’s father which he later bought. That he wasn’t doing much in Mumbai is best testified by a source who asks, “Why would a real businessman move to Rajasthan, lock, stock and barrel?”
Friends all Ruchir, Aditya Chellaram, Karima Burman and Minal (right) with a friend
Modi’s Rajasthan foray also gave him access to the cricket administration. He had tried to break into it through Himachal Pradesh earlier, but was foiled. Allegedly impersonating one ‘Lalit Kumar’, he contested the 2005 election of the Rajasthan Cricket Association. Vasundhararaje helped with a new law that dramatically changed the rules of voting. And Modi became the association president. His stock zoomed as he helped Sharad Pawar defeat Jagmohan Dalmiya in the BCCI elections the same year.
Playing hardball Defiant as ever in the middle of a storm, Modi on his way to a meeting with Mukesh Ambani on April 22
Interestingly, the marriage of Gaurav and Karima, the daughter of Minal through her first marriage, created a rift among the Burmans. No, they didn’t oppose the 2006 betrothal of the two, and had agreed to the idea (allegedly Lalit’s) to hold a grand wedding in Phuket, Thailand. The invite to Phuket was prepared but, inexplicably, the two got married in a civil ceremony in London without informing the Burmans. It was a tremendous loss of face for the owners of Dabur. A source told Outlook, “The Burmans have nothing to do with Gaurav at all. They’ve cut off all ties with him.” Gaurav now lives in a house rented from a trust by Lalit’s company.
Lalit’s presence in the IPL structure has raised the issue of conflict of interest, and even as the tournament kicked off in ’08, speculation about the bidding for teams was rife that Modi’s relatives and friends managed to bag teams—for Rajasthan, Punjab and Kolkata—because of inside information. No wonder, investigators are examining Modi’s possible involvement in money-laundering; they believe it’s no coincidence that the three teams he’s been linked with all have NRIs who’ve invested money through a maze of companies based in India and abroad. (Gaurav Burman, the Chellarams and Jay Mehta—a friend of Lalit’s—are all NRIs). “He prefers to deal with NRIs because then it’s easier for him to channel money in and out,” says a source. “It’s no coincidence that these three were the cheapest franchises, and very closely priced.”
Mahant Shiv Chandra Bhattacharya whose haveli Modi tried to wrest
People involved in that bidding say the pricing and bidding for teams were dictated by Modi. “The prices and every term was fixed, though no rule was bent publicly,” says an official with one franchisee. Quotes of bidders who lost out in 2008 weren’t made public, but insiders say the difference was as little as 5-10 per cent. “This suggests the bids were manipulated,” the official says. An expert connected with IPL’s marketing says, “IPL needs some cleaning. For three years, there have been a lot of dubious backroom tamashas with no questions. Now’s the time to clean up the act.”
Ultimately, what has proved to be Lalit’s undoing is his hubris, that of a man spoilt by his riches, who has known only to have his own way in life. “His attitude is arbitrary and arrogant,” says management consultant Latika Khaneja. “He wanted to build an insider club in IPL, with membership for friends. He was used to dictating terms to everyone.” You can do it in your family—but not in the world beyond it. As Modi continues to wage his battles—against the BCCI and the government—he perhaps thinks he can still win, as he has through most of his life.
By Rohit Mahajan, additional reporting by Arindam Mukherjee
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT