As West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee returned from her high profile Singapore trip, she was be greeted with some gloomy news. Investigations into the chit fund scam, which are now on in full swing, are leading to the doorsteps of many of her party people, including top ministers and bureaucrats. The country’s central investigating agency, CBI, last week, has been interrogating people suspected to be involved with the ponzi scheme and among them is the state textile minister Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, who allegedly sold his loss-making cement factory to a buyer who inexplicably bought it at more than three times the market price. That buyer was none other than ponzi scheme boss, Sudipto Sen. The CBI also made its first arrest in connection with the chit fund scam (Sudipto Sen and Trinamool Rajya Sabha member Kunal Ghosh had been arrested before the CBI probe began but the central agency took them into their custody after the Supreme Court directed it to carry out the investigations). East Bengal football team’s Debabrata Sarkar, who allegedly is close to top TMC leaders, was arrested.
Away From It All
But happy pictures and reports emanating from Singapore seemed to suggest that the unfortunate events unfolding in Bengal were not really worrying the Trinamool chief that much. A jubilant Mamata boasted about having made a breakthrough with Singaporean investors in terms of a number of memorandums of understandings (MoUs) and posed for photographs with her smiling entourage and members of the Indian community there. There was also some singing and dancing with Bengali pop hero Deb taking centre- stage. “For some reason she does not seem to be at all tense about what’s going on as far as the chit fund scam is concerned,” a close party member said to Outlook. “But let me tell you, things are not looking very good at all for the party,” he further confided.
Just An Employee
Incidentally, film director Aparna Sen was also questioned by the CBI. Sen had edited a bi-monthly magazine called Paroma owned by Sudipto Sen’s company. But it shut down around the time that the chit fund scam broke last year. Sen said that she was only an employee and did not deal with the finances at all.
I had skimmed through journalist Indrajit Hazra’s book on Calcutta, Grand Delusions when it first came out earlier this year. Since then, I had kept it on the top of a pile of books on my desk which I wanted to re-read. I found it intriguing. It’s as though he is walking through the ancient city with a flickering candle that lights up nooks and crannies making you want to see more. And in this flickering light we get glimpses into the minds of its eccentric citizens (the geo-centric man who informs NASA that the sun goes around the earth once in a year, only to receive polite a snub from them), we get privileged access to private moments in the city’s public spaces (the eyes of the waiters at a stuffy club following the “crotch area” as the jean-clad journalist asks where the bathroom is) and we get so drawn into the mazelike twists and turns where past merges into present and personal story blends easily into impersonal history, that it’s hard to extricate ourselves. And we don’t really want to. It’s a book I can read and reread.
It’s been more than a month since Germany snatched the soccer World Cup, but Calcutta seems still to be in the grips of football fever. Passersby on a sidewalk on Prince Anwar Shah Road, near a busy south Calcutta crossing have noted with some bemusement two mannequins standing side by side, wearing the jerseys of the Argentina and Brazil teams. Messi or what?
Written behind a truck: “Orey pet…tor jonno matha het.” [O Stomach! Because of you, my head's bowed]
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Hasan Imran, executive editor, Kalam, a Kumal Ghosh, also a media man, MP (Rajya Sabha), Srijnan Bose, MP (Rajya Sabha) an Mithun Chakraborti (Rajya Sabha),ief's Arpita Ghosh, MP (LS) either under CBI scanner or under custody, do not make good news for the party that patronizes such men with dark spots.
Such men enjoy the TMC chief's blessings. How come? Is it without deeper sgnificance?
I hope the chit fund scam derails Mamata in 2016. The state deserves better than CPM and Mamata.
Ideally I would prefer BJP but even Congress is a much better alternative than the other two.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT