Police speaking to Outlook have said that each of the possibilities is being investigated. But in the meantime, his aggrieved family is growing more restless and desperate by the day. "The uncertainly is torturous," said his elder brother Anil Upadhyay, stationmaster of Uttar Pradesh's Sultanpur Railway Station, who has now stationed himself in the Calcutta apartment where Dr Upadhyay lives. Anil and his other brothers (Sunil is the youngest of 4 brothers) go from door to door with a photo of him in the hope that someone would have seen him or could lead them to a clue. "We have searched in all the hospitals and even consulted soothsayers." The 35-year-old Dr Upadhyay, who had never married (his brothers say that he suffered from a crippling foot disease and was against 'ruining someone else's life) is also supposed to have been deeply into spirituality. One theory suggests that he renounced the world. But his family claim that he would not have done so without informing them that he was leaving. While the police investigate different angles…some disturbing questions remain:
The Potato Crisis
If you're visiting Calcutta and are thinking of bringing valuable gifts for your friends, family and relatives, you may consider bringing a bag of potatoes. "Hun?" you may ask. But yes, potatoes (and other vegetables like tomatoes, eggplants, okras and a host of other agricultural products) are reportedly among the many items that are becoming 'beyond the reach' of the common man – and woman – in Bengal. Aloo agoon (Potato on fire) is a common headline splashed across front pages and prime time televise news channels these days announcing to a distraught Bengal that prices of the potato are fire hot and steadily rising.
"Amader ranna manei aloo sheddo aar bhaat," (for us food means rice and boiled potato) said Nomita Pramanik, a domestic worker. "Ekhon ki shudu bhaat kheyey thaaktey hobey?" (Now do we have to survive only on rice?). Her family income is less than 10,000 thousand a month (she earns 3000 and her husband, an odd-jobs construction worker earns about 4000) and if she has to spend rupees 22 to 26 a kilo for potatoes (she has four children and needs at least one kilo of potatoes per day for the six of them for two meal) she says she will end up spending more on potatoes than her monthly income. The price rise is being attributed to lack of supply from other states. "Bengal does not grow enough potatoes to meet the consumption demands of the state but there is a slowdown of trade with states like Orissa,” said a trader.
Smoke Without Fire?
Aloo unfortunately was not the only thing that caught fire this week. The main stage of the Academy of Fine Arts, where a play of director Suman Mukhopadhyay, was being staged, found itself engulfed in flames as the curtain was coming down at the end of an Act. As smoke and fire bellowed from the stage with the drapes burning, the audience stampeded out of the one exit at the far end of the stage. Several people were injured and an actress had to be carried out in an unconscious state. Lead actress Swastika Mukherjee, shocked and traumatized said, "There are no emergency fire exists and we somehow managed to escape."
Director Mukhopadhyay, who has reportedly not been in the "good books" of the ruling regime after being overtly critical in several of his plays and films, have called it a "mysterious occurrence." Commentators backing this theory – that it may have been a retaliatory act of vengeance – observed that recently the Academy was staging "back-to-back" plays of Mukhopadhyay and Kaushik Sen, another thespian who has been critical of the government. But spokespeople of the ruling regime, who did not want to be named told Outlook, "There is always a conspiracy theory…even a fire is now being thought about as an act of vengeance. This is too much." Whatever the case maybe, all one can say is there is no smoke without fire…make what you will of that.
Written behind an auto: Bhalobaasha boley kichu naai…tobu aami shudhu tomaakey chaai (There is nothing called love….but still I want you so)
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
It is true TMC is scared of Modi. Unless there is some major changes, BJP will cut their votes heavily.
She should concentrate on governing. In WB the consumer population has grown exponencially because of infiltration allowed compared supply of not just potatoes but many other goods and necessacities.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT