Writers’ Buildings, the West Bengal Secretariat, is no longer going to be the state’s seat of power. At least not for the next three months. The big news was broken to journalists last Wednesday. But political compulsions is not what influenced the decision. The reasons were logistical: large scale renovation. “The Writers’ Building has turned into a tinderbox,” explained chief minister Mamata Banerjee, “causing panic to employees. The centuries-old building requires immediate repairs. I want safety of my employees.” Built in 1777 Writers Buildings was constructed to house clerks of the East India, who were also known as writers, which explains the name. For the moment the government will operate from an administrative building in Howrah. Not surprisingly the decision has met with quite a bit of resistance and criticism with detractors pointing out that the 200 crore project is not only a colossal waste of money, but also virtually impossible to execute and will throw everything off gear. The most important question to ask is: Will the change in locale have an impact on quality of governance? Only time will tell.
The way both Mamata Banerjee and Mukesh Ambani weree smiling at the Mumbai industrial meet last week, it was difficult to tell who was happier. The Bengal chief minister or the head of Reliance Industries Limited. Didi possibly could hardly believe her luck when the top industrialist dropped in at the meeting which had been organized to woo investors to Bengal. After all, no industrialist worth his salt was seen anywhere near the vicinity of Bengal lately. So much so that last year’s annual Bengal industrial meet, Bengal Leads, was nicknamed Bengal Bleeds, after it got the royal snub from most industry heavyweights. Ambani on the other hand may have been excited about his improved prospects of getting a share of Bengal Haldia Petrochemicals – which he has reportedly been eyeing – by hobnobbing with the Bengal CM. Well, it seems to be a symbiotic relationship. In the meantime, the government has already earmarked one hundred acres from its ten thousand-acre land for Ambani, who has announced plans to invest around 3000 crores in the state and set up his 4 G network. Evidently he is not put off by the state’s hands-off land policy which has deterred others from wishing to set up shop in the state. In return, he has much to gain. The least of which is a virtually competition-free market. So he does have much to smile about.
Who's Smiling Now?
Speaking of smiling, not too long ago Didi told us that Darjeeling was smiling. But, even at that time, more than Darjeeling it was Didi who was smiling. Because every time Bimal Gurung, the leader of the Gorkhaland movement, flashed a smile he also simultaneously issued a veiled threat— that the stir for a separate state could re-ignite at any moment. But Didi either hoped that the threat would go away if she ignored it, or that it wouldn’t at least reignite in any foreseeable future. So she was content to have paved the way for the creation the Gorkha Territorial Administration thinking that the semi-independent administrative body would keep the people of the hills of North Bengal equally happy. But it was a lack of political farsightedness that she didn’t see what granting statehood to Telengana would mean for her. Also, unfortunately for her, she has forfeited her power to put pressure on the central government when she walked out of the UPA last year. So she finds herself dealing with Darjeeling alone. The centre did send five companies of paramilitary but this confrontational approach will ultimately spell political doom in the hills. The centre of course is playing a clever game by being the good cop. As Mamata and her ministers— North Bengal development minister Gautam Deb too issued warnings to the hill people that any kind of dissent would be crushed with a heavy hand— get aggressive, the centre is taking a soft diplomatic line with the Gorkhas. They heard Gurung out patiently and asked him to maintain peace without taking the same strict stance as the Bengal state government. At any rate, a frowning Didi would now agree that Darjeeling is now scowling.
Helps Being A Rocket Scientist...
The ABP group’s annual “Shera Bangali” (Best Bengali) awards ceremony sees talented Bengalis from across the world return to Calcutta to be felicitated for their contribution in myriad fields. While many of the recipients of the award are Bengalis who live in Calcutta, each year Bengalis eagerly wait to see who the “probashi Bangali” (the Bengali living outside of Calcutta/Bengal) would be. Among those to have been recognized previously are Amartya Sen and Pranab Mukherjee among non-Calcutta Bengalis and Sourav Ganguly among the Calcutta residents. This week, the event’s 9th anniversary brought back rocket scientist Anita Sengupta, without whose engineering brilliance, NASA’s space mission on Mars wouldn’t be a smooth landing. Though she cannot speak a word of Bengali (she left 17 years ago)— when asked by one of the hosts to say a few things in Bengali, she said it was difficult but managed somehow to pronounce “Poschim Bongo”, then reverted to English saying, “it’s nice to be back here” — Bengal still claims its own. “In fact, one of the most endearing qualities about this recognition is that you could be far away from anything Bengali, but suddenly you would be made aware that you have a connection to this great land,” said one of the recipients. Another scientist to have been felicitated this year was Dr Sunando Bandyopadhyay for his role in the discovery of God particle.
All in the Name
As Durga Puja draws nearer and Bengal’s potters are looking for inspiration to model their idols, the face that is likely to come up big time is that of the brave IAS officer Durga Shakti. North Calcutta’s Kumartuli where the idols of Durga are sculpted from clay is known for its potter’s penchant for thematic representations. For instance, in 2011, many potters modelled their idols on the visage of Mamata Banerjee, who had won just become chief. The year that Lady Diana died in a car crash in faraway Europe, several Bengal potters made the tragic princess their muse. Filmmaker Rituporno Ghosh immortalized this trend amongst potters in his film Antarmahal, where the sculptor (played by Abhishek Bachhan) working for a wealthy zamindar models his Durga after the landlord’s wife (played by Soha Ali Khan) with whom he has fallen in love. In fact, the brave IAS officer couldn’t be a more appropriate choice as a model…both for her name and what she stands for.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
The reason why the Taj Mahal Hotel is supposed to be what it represents, is curiously, that the heritage hotel, might not have airconditioners, in certain areas! I heard of the Raffles Hotel in Singapore, before I knew of the mentioned establishment in Mumbai. The management of the Raffles Hotel, has changed hands, but not of the Taj Mahal Hotel.
It seems, Writer's Building is older than the mentioned heritage buildings, perhaps U. N. E. S. C. O. has a concern towards them. It's pretty unusual, and the thought is really a bit funny, that Writer's Building isn't a concern of U. N. E. S. C. O., and the West Bengal govt. might have got the United Nations interested in tourism, and heritage buildings, by making them feel akin to the building.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT