But this isn’t a story about the Nehru-Gandhis. It’s about Amethi’s original first family and a tale of two wives—Garima, the first wife of local scion Sanjay Singh, and Ameeta, to whom he is married now. Garima and her three children—Mahima, Anant Vikram and Shaivya—have declared a war for their inheritance, the battleground being none other than the royal Bhupati Palace in Amethi.
Sanjay is being charged with using his political clout to evict Garima and her children from the palace where they have been camping for the last two months. “The Amethi district magistrate called my brother Anant Vikram last Friday and told him pointedly that there were instructions from the UP chief minister to leave the Amethi Bhupati Palace by the next morning,” Mahima, 39, told Outlook.
It has been almost two decades since Sanjay married Ameeta Modi nee Kulkarni, a national badminton ace of the 1980s, after her national badminton champion husband Syed Modi was gunned down in 1988 outside Lucknow’s sports stadium where he used to go for his daily practice. Both Sanjay and Ameeta were among the key accused till they got a clean chit from the apex court. They married subsequently, with Sanjay apparently having used a proxy for Garima to get a mutual divorce decree.
Garima has been silent all these years about the technically ‘polygamous’ situation and has, in fact, even defended Sanjay at times. If she has decided to act after 19 years, she says it’s “in the larger interest of her children”.
Sanjay, once a close lieutenant of the Nehru-Gandhi brothers, fell out of favour with the family after changing political hue once too often. For the moment, though, he is back in the Congress fold as a Rajya Sabha member.
Bhupati Palace. (Photograph by Sandeep Pal)
“We were literally on tenterhooks for many days as the local officials and police were totally misguided by our father and Ameeta Modi, who got even my driver and servant beaten up on the palace premises and got us locked inside,” says Anant, 37, who worked in the merchant navy. “I told the DM that this palace legitimately belonged to us as much as it belongs to my father as it was an ancestral property. And only after I showed proof of our claims did the official machinery stopped interfering.”
Father Sanjay flatly denies all the allegations. “It is very unfortunate that my children have resorted to such cheap tactics. They are being misguided by some persons. An empty mind is the devil’s workshop, and that is what is happening to my son, who has quit the navy and has no work to do. All they are interested in is more money. My son is perhaps also interested in inheriting Amethi’s legacy, without having to work for it. This, when I have given him a huge apartment in Gurgaon and I also give him Rs 1 lakh pocket money every month.”
Asked why he was depriving his first family of their rightful inheritance of the billion-rupees worth property in Amethi, he says, “I have never said that. I am ready to sit across the table and sort out things. But I surely do not approve of the idea of washing dirty linen in public.”
Fortified by her children, Garima is beginning to ask the questions now. Daughter Mahima, who lives with her husband in San Francisco, is camping with her mother and siblings in two rooms in one portion of the palace. They all see Ameeta as the “villain of the piece”, even though she had managed to win them over at one point of time by doling out goodies to them.
The deprived lot Garima (seated) with Anant, his wife, Mahima, Shaivya. (Photograph by Sandeep Pal)
Now they are going ahead and questioning her very status as Sanjay’s legally wedded wife. “The very basis of my father’s marriage with Ameeta Modi is false. Please take a look at the Supreme Court order which in 1998 set aside the divorce decree fraudulently obtained by my father. It also clearly upheld my mother’s status as the true and legally wedded wife of Sanjay Singh.”
Ameeta’s only gameplan, say Garima’s children, “is to see that the legitimate heirs of the Amethi palace are deprived of their inheritance rights so that she can grab all the property over which she has no rightful claim.”
Garima had, in fact, lodged an FIR with the Amethi police on Friday, claiming that the palace staff was keeping her and her children captive on Ameeta’s orders, who has been the undisputed ‘rani’ for two decades.
Local sympathy meanwhile is beginning to veer towards Anant, which cannot be good news for Ameeta, who has been the local MLA on a BJP ticket. Hundreds of people stood up in Anant’s support last week in Amethi when some goons, allegedly let loose by Ameeta, attempted to attack him on July 25.
“The local police has now gone ahead registered a counter-FIR against me,” exclaims Mahima. “And while the cops have taken no action on the FIR lodged by my mother a day earlier, station in-charge Mohammed Hameed is busy conveying direct and indirect threats to us to vacate the premises or face eviction.” Neither the police station in-charge nor the district magistrate responded to repeated calls.
“Nearly nine of us (including some relatives) are living in two rooms, with just one toilet and a non-functional kitchen in one corner of the massive palace; and my father and his illegal wife want us evicted from there too,” says Mahima. “I am simply seeking justice for my mother and brother, and we will take this fight to a logical legal end.” The princely state is gone, the princely estate remains.
By Sharat Pradhan in Lucknow
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Sanjay is the suspected murderer and Amita is the suspected accomplice and this is well known.Though courts have exonerated them there was only one motive-to get rid of Modi so that Sanjay can marry Ammeta.Rest in history.These kinds of poeple will only wreak havoc as long as they live.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT