Ex-priest Shibu Kalaparamban, who left the Vincentian Order in March, released his book, Oru Vaidekante Hridayamitaa (Here lies the Heart of a Priest), on September 2. This, of course, comes in the wake of last year’s shock expose from Sister Jesme who had the clergy reeling with her book Amen, a heartfelt, frank account of the sex and debauchery within the convent walls.
Shibu, 39, whose uncle is a priest and who has two cousins who are nuns, says he decided to publish the book (1,000 copies first run) after much introspection. There was resentment within the family, even physical threats from outside. “But I felt the Church needs a correction and I hope they heed my words of caution.”
The book reveals how some priests and nuns have thrown celibacy to the winds and how sexually exploited nuns, orphans and widows are unable to complain for fear of reprisals from the powerful clergy. Among them are also a few paedophiles whose staple is porn literature and videos, he alleges in the book.
Shibu, who lived the life of a priest for 11 years, says he himself was a victim at the hands of seniors at the papal seminary in Pune. “Homosexual attacks are rampant in seminaries. Victims suffer silently because if they complain, the offender and the victim will be forced to leave... and they are at a young age.” As for the instances of financial fraud, Shibu says the clergy sometimes do cheat the faithful. “There’s no proper accounts on the money collected during baptism, anointing, blessings et al.” Some priests pocket all the donations, he says.
Reacting to the allegations, Fr Paul Thelakat, spokesperson for the Syro-Malabar Church, said he felt “very sorry about what had been written. It is unfortunate that the young man finds only perversions in the Church”. Fr Thelakat alleges that the papal seminary in Pune, where the former priest was trained, had advised his superiors not to ordain him but they did so anyway, on compassionate grounds. “It’s a pity...he was a priest throughout these years and he has heard confessions and given spiritual guidance. He has betrayed the trust of the faithful, divulging even confessional secrets to the public,” says Thelakat.
But it’s true that the Church does need to do a bit of soul-searching. Shibu isn’t a lone case. There’s Sr Jesme and then the latest, Fr Johnson Karoor, who came out last month. Straight out of the cassock, he plunged into films, taking on the role of a villain in the Malayalam film Nirakazhcha. The film didn’t do too well, but the ex-priest seems happy, and relieved, in his new avatar.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT