This is one of the many weird ads aired on mainstream channels and regional ones at night. Look for the wonder formula called Easy Slim Tea. It claims to give you “an attractive figure and impressive personality”. Made from handpicked Chinese and Indian herbs, it promises a sylph-like figure in a matter of days that will veer your husband’s attention away from other women. No sweaty gyms, no tough diets, just sit and sip tea and watch the flab melt. Or catch the Aire Bra ‘infomercial’ with its wonderweave extra oomph band, smooth, seamless sides and breezy, flexible design in midnight black, pure white and sexy nude. Scantily clad models display the ‘scientifically designed, noble creation’ with much candour.
The Aire Bra promises ‘scientifically designed’ oomph
So what really is the idea behind advertising such questionable and surreptitious products at shady hours? Paritosh Joshi, principal provocateur, advisory, and former CEO of Star CJ Network India, calls it predatory marketing. “The whole idea is to market an action that seeks to exploit a vulnerability. In many cases, it’s an attempt to exploit the deep vein of superstition that runs through people,” he says. As the entire focus is on celebrity worship, people opt for the bizarre when they find no alternative. “Physical infirmities such as balding, obesity, arthritis or heart diseases can drive people batty and they lose sleep over them. These ads offer blatantly absurd fulfilment of wishes,” says Joshi.
A Shubh Dhan Varsha idol ‘cures’ poverty; No Addiction ‘cures’ alcoholism; the accordion wallet
So why are these ads allowed on mainstream TV channels? Isn’t there any agency to check the veracity of the bizarre claims they make? The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) is the self-regulatory body of the advertising industry and takes steps only if someone complains. But it lacks teeth and its rulings are not quite legally binding. Most manufacturers, on the face of it, don’t appear to have discernible registration certificates, addresses, official e-mails or dealers. Do they mostly operate through call centres where you can place the order and send the money? Sumanto Chattopadhyay, the executive creative director of O&M, South Asia, says advertising in India isn’t well-regulated, especially for satellite channels. There’s nobody to check the authenticity of these ads. “If someone brings a lawsuit against the actors endorsing these questionable brands, perhaps they would be held accountable in some manner. But this kind of lawsuit has no precedent.” Has no one then ever lodged a complaint with the ASCI or a consumer court challenging the authenticity of such products? Ram Ray says the procedure of filing a complaint is too long-drawn. After a point, even the complainant’s indignation wears off.
TV channels, including some mainstream ones, run the ads since there’s easy money to be made. There are no programming costs; it’s simply selling space to these advertisers. “Most of the lesser-known channels make about Rs 5-6 crore a year, while the prestigious ones make Rs 25-30 crore yearly,” says Rahul Sood, head of affiliate sales, NDTV. “If they are not getting into adult content or showing anything counter-productive, then selling those extra minutes just gets them easy cash.” But what’s so wrong, asks Sanjay Verma, CEO of Divyarishi, a teleshopping company that offers a wide range of such products. “We conduct surveys and design solutions for problems rampant in society. Even Colgate promises you sparkling white teeth. But does it always turn out that way? The same is true for teleshopping ads. People have varied experiences,” he says. There might even be a disparity in the price at which the product is peddled from a foreign country and at which it is sold in India. “The pricing extortion is invisible, as there are no restrictions on the import of such products,” says Paritosh Joshi.
So it goes. Tougher rules and self-regulation by channels is one thing, but can’t the buyers see through such tall talk?
Apropos An Open Slot For Bitter Pills (Feb 11), the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954, must be invoked by the government to prosecute people carrying misleading ads in print and on TV.
C. Nithyananda Pai, Puttur
India is better by comparison. The late-night products most peddled on US channels are for erectile dysfunction.
The late-night TV ads are not intended to inform, but to manipulate viewers.
Beena Mathur, Pune
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Actually we are still better in India - Late night product that they sell on channels in the US is for erectile dysfunction ---- now beat that .....
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT