While the state anti-corruption bureau (ACB) has launched a full-fledged investigation against NCP ministers Chhagan Bhujbal and Sunil Tatkare for alleged corruption and amassing assets disproportionate to their known sources of income, several other leaders of the party are also under the scanner of various investigating agencies. A rough roster:
Minister for water resources
A close aide of Ajit Pawar, Tatkare took over the reins of the irrigation department from him in 2009. His tenure has been marked by controversies ever since. Tatkare reportedly significantly escalated the cost of irrigation projects in Maharashtra both during his own and his predecessor’s tenure. For instance, he is said to have dubiously increased costs by up to 150 per cent and 500 per cent for the Balganga and Kondhane dam projects in the state. What has, however, really put the minister in the dock is a petition filed by Kirit Somaiya of the BJP before the Bombay High Court. Based on over 2,000 pages of documentary evidence he has submitted, the ACB is currently investigating Tatkare and his family for allegedly acquiring 7,500 acres of farmland illegally by creating a web of over 100 front companies. And one of the ‘directors’ in one of the many Tatkare companies is none other than the son of a gardener who’s in his employ!
Minister for public works and special assistance
Bhujbal is another minister currently being investigated by the ACB for his alleged corruption in the construction of the Maharashtra Sadan in New Delhi. Bhujbal is alleged to have misused his official position to ensure that contracts were awarded to firms owned by his relatives and friends. The BJP in Maharashtra has alleged that Bhujbal was instrumental in escalating the cost of renovating Maharashtra Sadan thrice over from the original Rs 52 crore to a more juicy Rs 152 crore! Even though the government was not paying for the construction, the benefit of this cost escalation is said to have been passed on to the companies or sub-contractors having direct or indirect links with Bhujbal or his family. The contract to provide furniture for the 16,000 square feet guesthouse, for instance, was awarded to a firm called Ideen, which has Bhujbal’s daughters-in-law as directors. Political and industry circles were also abuzz with news of a Rs 2.5 crore donation by leading industrial group IndiaBulls to the Bhujbal Foundation in lieu of contracts in Nashik. In addition, the minister is alleged to have misused the trust property and misappropriated trust money to the tune of over Rs 100 crore.
This NCP strongman from Jalgaon is under the scanner for two scams. He has been arrested and chargesheeted along with Shiv Sena MLA Sureshdada Jain in a Rs 40 crore-plus Jalgaon housing scam related to the construction of 11,000 low-cost houses in that northern Maharashtra town. Investigations are also under way for his alleged role in the Rs 42-crore Waghur drinking water supply plan fraud. Deokar was a member of the Jalgaon Municipal Council between 1995 and 2000, when it floated construction tenders for the housing scheme in 1997. The council promised to provide nine plots for the project, of which it did not own five while the remaining four were reserved for a school, public garden or hospital. Deokar allegedly altered tender conditions to enable Khandesh Builders, a front company of Sena’s Sureshdada, to secure the contract. The project never took off, but Khandesh Builders were allegedly given massive funds.
PWD minister in charge of Maharashtra State Road Development
This NCP minister is believed to have diverted funds meant for the infrastructure development of Mumbai for the construction of a flyover in his hometown Beed despite the lack of mandatory clearances. He also reportedly bent rules for the project despite repeated objections from bureaucrats and other agencies. The minister is said to have sanctioned the project in 2010 in the name of easing traffic congestion. As per rules, MSRDC needed permission from the public works department, the cabinet infrastructure subcommittee and the NHAI. Not only did the PWD reportedly not give its approval for the project, it also ‘warned’ MSRDC against it. As for the cabinet sub-committee, its permission was not even sought, while the NHAI had asked MSRDC to put the project on hold till the completion of the Beed bypass road. Not just that, according to a petition filed in the Bombay High Court, the Beed flyover is being financed by diverting a part of the Rs 2,100 crore MSRDC had got originally for Mumbai’s infrastructure development.
The CBI questioned him in 2011 regarding the source of funds for the purchase of Flat No. 601 in the controversial Adarsh Housing Society. In his statement before the judicial commission inquiring into the Adarsh scam, Ahwad confirmed having paid up to Rs 79 lakh to the society. The payments were routed via Jitnat Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, a company whose director Ahwad was till early 2012.
Minister for excise, environment and labour
Accused of misappropriating Rs 2.38 crore from the Kalwa Belapur Sahkari Bank in Navi Mumbai between 1995 and 1998, he is said to have misused his official position to get loans sanctioned to parties directly or indirectly related to him.
Given this swirl of corruption charges around its ministers, talks are rife that a cabinet reshuffle is in the offing in Maharashtra and that the NCP chief is keen on replacing the tainted ministers. However, Girish Kuber, the executive editor of the Loksatta group, feels that the NCP, despite the allegations, may manage to escape the voters’ anger “because in their respective constituencies, each of these reportedly corrupt ministers are like Robin Hoods. They are more concerned with their own constituency and not the state as a whole”.
However, Kumar Ketkar, a senior journalist and political analyst from Maharashtra, thinks otherwise. “The NCP,” he says, “cannot pretend these scams never happened because these are well-known scams and well-known scamsters. I am not sure how strongly they will be proved in a court of law. So will the NCP be answerable at any point in time? Who will they answer to? These are the same people who set up committees and give nods for investigations.” There is, indeed, no answer.
Raj Thackeray goes after Biharis in Mumbai saying they are petty thieves and that they are not dharti-putras. What about sons of the soil like Ajit Pawar, Sunil Tatkare and Chhagan Bhujbal involved in a Rs 70,000 crore irrigation scam (A Whole Lotta Loot Going On?, Oct 15)?
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Ajit Pawar has some very strong stars,what with Congress fixed in DLF/Vadra link.
All such scams were 72000 crores disappeared will evaporate from public memory.
All Con men are busy defending Indias son in law.
What about the sardar of all chors:
Manmohan Singh and his boss the white empress
December 2012 India will be declared monarchy!!!
NIHILISTIC & CORRUPT PARTY
Politicians should fired....They are the real fuel of Dozakh....
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT