Six days after it vanished into thin air, Malaysian Airlines—as a mark of respect for the missing Flight MH370—renamed the Kuala Lumpur-Beijing leg MH318. Would the gesture mean MH370 has officially ceased to exist, lost forever—as news of its whereabouts continues to elude the world at the time of writing—or will it serve to etch it in memory as the flight that never reached home?
There had certainly been no inkling of any events to come. MH370 had departed from Kuala Lumpur at 12.45 am local time, on March 8, the weather forecast had predicted nothing worrisome, and last heard, it was cruising peacefully at 35,000 feet at 1,000 km per hour. A Boeing 377-200, the flight wasn’t chock-a-block; there were 227 passengers on board, 55 short of the aircraft’s seating capacity of 282. They were a typical mix of businessmen, MNC executives, people travelling to meet friends or family. Out in the night sky, it would have appeared as one more routine flight. Exactly what the cockpit crew reported to air control at 1.40 am, one hour into the five-hour, 53-minute flight. It was on course for yet another hour; a visible blip on the radar at 2.40 am.
Something happened for MH370 to exit its designated flight path and enter into the annals of aviation history.
Graphic by Rahul Awasthi
The records and timeline suggest that the aircraft was in the air long enough to have crossed Thailand and reach far north into Vietnam. From then on, though, neither contact nor radar presence has been reported. The pilots made no distress calls, nor did the sophisticated transponder built into the aircraft transmit any signals.
None of this, though, has translated into any conclusive news of the plane. Rare though it is, there are instances in the past where aircraft have disappeared without leaving behind any trace of passengers or the plane. In 2009, there was no news of Air France’s Flight 447 en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris for five days, till rescuers found the bodies and debris of the plane—they discovered where it had crashed into the Atlantic. The ‘black box’ was located only two years later.
Meanwhile, Malaysian Airlines authorities and senior members of the Kuala Lumpur government are trying their best to assure aggrieved relatives, harassed friends and agitated neighbours like China—which had the bulk of the passengers on the ill-fated flight. Alongside, questions are being raised on the existing flight security and safety standards in Malaysia and elsewhere in the world.
But for as long as there is no news, there is hope. Families, friends and the world at large are rallying in hope and prayer, waiting for a miracle to happen. One couple must already be thanking heavens for the miracle that did happen to them. Booked on MH370, they missed the flight because they couldn’t reach the airport on time.
8 Other Flights Which Vanished Into Thin Air Just Like Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370
7 Things You Must Know About A Black Box
This is about Outlook’s excellent coverage of the disappeared Malaysia Airlines plane (Flight into the Unknown, Mar 24). The MH370 has stirred some of our deepest fears and concerns. In today’s hyperconnected world, it is hard to imagine that a large commercial airliner could simply vanish, even after a flotilla of ships and scores of specialised aircraft have been looking for it. Shows how often human knowledge, vast as it may seem, when pitted against the unknown, comes up short.
J.S. Acharya, Hyderabad
In the interest of passengers and airlines, it is imperative that the mystery is solved so that it doesn’t scare passengers off and trigger an epidemic-level fear of flying.
K.R. Srinivasan, Secunderabad
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
This is my theory about this mystery [click the link below]
The Missing Malaysian Flight MH370: Did it Descend to the Sea Safely?
Sad till now many used to get scared seeing beards as co-passngers now added worry for them will be the Crew.
Though I am not effected but ican't deny that I do observe the worried looks on faces of many co-passengers .
Wrong but what can be done - human mind ?
Actually India has collected some such flight recorders. Nothing is done about them because of the instruction on them - DO NOT OPEN.
Seeing the cutaway graphic, one realises how much space is reserved for the passengers in first class. Truly sinful.
An aircraft, once airborne, is one of the safest products devised by human ingenuity. Inconceivable that there could be a benign explanation for this tragedy.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT