This was first published in the Times of India
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
"the BJP did its utmost to make a mockery of secularism blah blah"
"secularism" means keeping government away from religion, but Indian secularism is such that the govt, collects all proceeds from hindu temples but not for christian or muslim places of worship. This is not secularism, so let's cut the bullsh*t that India practices secularism like the US, because it does not. Indian "secularism" is a pustulent sore on the face of Indian democracy -- Indian law must treat all religions on equal footing by keeping out of religion altogether, in order for India to be called secularism.
It is truly precious when jihad supporting islamist aholes try to preach to the rest of us about supporting Indian "secularism". Again we can that the piece of sh*t Nehru for how things have come to pass -- hope that rotten bas**** Nehru is roasting in hell for what he has done to India.
>> Rejection of the Congress brand of politics is rejection of pseudo-secularism...
Instead of demanding that the government be truly secular, the BJP did its utmost to make a mockery of secularism by inventing pejorative phrases like "pseudo-secularism", "vote-bank politics" and "minority appeasement". The fact is that destroying secularism has always been the goal of the RSS/BJP acolytes. Notice how Modi could not even define 'secularism'. He called it "India first" policy. "India first" policy is patriotism, not secularism. And yet the Moditards applauded his pseudo-definition!
>> India will never go the way of Pakistan.
Empty words in a serious discussion are jarring. You seem to specialize in platitudes!
"giving up on it (secularism) would be like giving in to the worst forces in the country and taking the course that Pakistan took."
1. Nobody has given up on secularism. Rejection of the Congress brand of politics is rejection of pseudo-secularism, of a state which discriminates on the basis of religion and in which minorities' insecuties are exploited for harvesting electoral dividends.. The culture of India, the Ganga-Jamuna tehzeeb, as my friend Anwaar likes to call it , is suffused by the spirit of secularism.
2. India will never go the way of Pakistan - elimination of minorities, scant respect for democracy, a rogue armed forces, a theocracy. There is no equivalence with Pakistan. The forces active in Pakistan are regressive and atavistic in nature. In India, such forces are absent. Which explains why India has steadfastly clung to democracy but for a brief period in 1975-77 when Indira Gandhi suspended the constitution after an adverse decision of the Allahabad High Court.
>> secularism must be defined very precisely.
Agreed! In fact a lot needs to be done differently. But giving up on it would be like giving in to the worst forces in the country and taking the course that Pakistan took.
Anwaar ... "but secularism alone has the force of constitutional status."
True but then that secularism must be defined very precisely (and as accepted by the secular world) "as a strict separation of church and state". We cannot be namby-pamby about it and say of but we are Indians, special and hence have a special definition of Secularism. Once defined actions whether by governments claiming the secular tag or people claiming this tag should push towards this ideal.
Today what we have is majority communalism and minority (read muslim) communalism.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT