Known as “goodwill moon rocks”, these are lunar samples that Richard Nixon, who was the American president between 1969 and 1974, sent out to different countries and all American states as a “symbol of the unity of human endeavour” and with the “hope of the American people for a world of peace”. Brought back to earth during the manned Apollo 11 and Apollo 17 missions in 1969 and 1972 respectively, these rough, crudely shaped dark brown lunar rocks were presented to 135 countries and the 50 American states on two different occasions. The standard Apollo 11 plaque has four small pieces (weighing a total of 0.05 grams) encased in an acrylic button and the Apollo 17 one has one bigger chunk of moon rubble (weighing 1.142 grams) sealed in a transparent thermoplastic ball. Both these plaques also carry the flags of the nations and the American states that were carried aboard on these two missions and come with a message from the Nixon administration.
While only the Americans and Russians have managed to bring back moon rocks and continue to be their owners, these goodwill rocks, on the other hand, went on to become the property of the countries and states they were gifted to. And with poor record-keeping, many of them went missing, often during times of strife and disaster. Some were also stolen and carried away by public functionaries to their homes. Of the total 370 moon rock gifts, Gutheinz and his associates have been able to track down only 77 (see box for some unusual moon rock stories). When this correspondent contacted the 56-year-old Gutheinz, now a Texas-based lawyer and professor living in the Houston suburb of Friendswood, he reported the two Indian rocks as “missing”. This after he and his students had sent out over a hundred e-mails to Indian authorities and institutes, including isro and the MEA, but heard nothing from them. Intrigued, Outlook decided to help Gutheinz’s project, which runs in close collaboration with NASA, and tried to track down the Indian moon rocks.
We found the Apollo 17 rock safely stored and exhibited in the Parliament Museum in New Delhi. It was made possible because of a document from the United States National Archives that recorded the arrival of Apollo 17 astronauts in India in 1973 and their meeting with the then Lok Sabha speaker G.S. Dhillon, to whom the rock was gifted. Outlook called the Lok Sabha secretariat to find out where gifts received by Lok Sabha speakers may be. We were guided to the museum, which was set up in 2006. After several queries on the phone and on e-mail, this correspondent was asked to visit the museum to see the rock. And there it was, placed in the US section alongside a plaque of the preamble of the American constitution that was gifted to India by Barack Obama.
Ironically, the rock remains there without any record as no Indian document details its provenance. American documents—for that matter any foreign archival records—are not good enough. A request to take a picture of the extraterrestrial gift was also not granted by the time this article went to the press. When Outlook told Gutheinz, also known as the “moon rock hunter”, that the 78th goodwill gift had been tracked down, he said he was “absolutely ecstatic”. “The problem is that once these rocks went out, they were not entered into any inventory system, something of a national archives or database,” he adds.
Rock chaser Joseph R. Gutheinz Jr
On the other hand, the Apollo 11 rocks, usually an assortment of four pieces and given out to heads of states, remain ‘missing’ still. Outlook made calls to possible locations where it may be stored, including the Nehru Planetarium, the National Museum and the Indira Gandhi Memorial Museum (since it was gifted during her reign) but was told to look elsewhere. Even Rashtrapati Bhavan officials denied any knowledge of this gift and asked this correspondent to check with the MEA, as all foreign gifts are managed by it and closeted away in a central warehouse, also known as the toshakhana. While MEA spokesperson Syed Akbaruddin said he had no information at all on the rocks, a wire service report from 2008 mentioned that the most expensive gift stocked there is a framed replica of the royal Thai emblem and a gold miniature studded with diamonds valued at Rs 1 million. Many will hope the babus responsible for this estimate were not smart enough to figure out that a piece of the moon easily costs more than most things on earth and that the moon rocks are safe in the toshakhana.
Jennifer Janoff, one of the students who volunteered to track down the Indian rocks, says she too had e-mailed several Indian authorities in February this year, including the PMO, the Ahmedabad-based Physical Research Laboratory (which stocks many of the moon rocks loaned from NASA), the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in Mumbai (which has used loaned moon rock samples for research) and Devendra Lal, currently a physicist in California but someone who worked with lunar rocks in India. “Not a single one of them replied,” Janoff says. “I was a little disappointed.” Lal, according to one newspaper report, was part of a popular moon rock tour that travelled across the country in 1969, the year of the Apollo 11 mission. Lal also did not reply to an e-mail from Outlook.
Apollo 17 rocks of Cyprus; Apollo 11 rocks of Alaska
Lost & Found In Some Strange Places...
Some stories of where the moon rocks turned up
Even an exhaustive Google search failed to throw up any references. “We know for a fact that India too got the Apollo 11 rocks,” asserts Gutheinz. The former NASA special agent argues that, unlike the Honduras samples, the Indian Apollo 11 rocks are worth much more given the India’s more prominent international standing than that of Honduras. “And given that the rocks probably passed through the hands of a well-known leader like Indira Gandhi, a collector could pay an enhanced value, anywhere between $7-10 million (Rs 35-50 crore),” he says. The only legitimate sale of lunar rocks, according to Gutheinz, was in 1993 when the Sotheby’s auction house in New York sold 0.2 g of lunar dust for $4,42,500 (Rs 1.4 crore approximately at 1993 exchange rates).
What also began as an investigative tool for his students, the Moon Rock Project, Gutheinz adds, has reached out to the offices of presidents, prime ministers, kings and dictators. However, limited funds mean most of the hunt relies on e-mails. It is essentially motivated to ensure that bits of the 842 pounds of moon rock that NASA astronauts brought back “are not lost forever or end up in some thug’s pocket”. Even if the Indian Apollo 11 rocks are secured in some government vault or proudly displayed in some unsuspecting scientist’s or babu’s living room, Gutheinz thinks it negates the intended purpose of the gift to the people of India, one that ought to be in public exhibit rather than in safe isolation. “I am reminded of the NASA astronaut who told me his story of how he decided to become one,” says Gutheinz. The astronaut, when a kid, always wanted to be a pilot, but that changed when he saw a moon rock sample at the Smithsonian museum. “The closer he got to it, he realised he wanted to go beyond the earth’s atmosphere. I think of boys and girls in India going through the same metamorphosis and cosmic experience with the Apollo 11 rocks.”
Rakesh Sharma, the only Indian to have travelled to space and whose Soyuz T-10 capsule is on display at the Nehru Planetarium, seconds him. “It should be in a place like the Nehru Planetarium where people can come and see it,” he says. After 30 years being locked away in a store of the Canadian Museum of Nature, the Apollo 17 Canadian rock finally went on display at the Canadian Science and Technology Museum in Ottawa. Most will therefore agree it is not an unreasonable request when Gutheinz asks for the moon, rather the bits of it that still remain missing from India.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
I am sorry to have to point out a glaring error in this article. The USA is the only nation to have landed men on the moon, and the only nation to have collected moon rocks, yet DEBARSHI DASGUPTA says that Russia too "managed to bring back moon rocks"! There has never been a Russian probe that landed on the moon, collected samples and then returned to earth.
I just checked and discovered that I was wrong and the author is right: "the Soviet Union later achieved sample returns of lunar soil via the unmanned Luna 16, Luna 20 and Luna 24 Moon landings". I stand corrected.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT