The faces of district health officials tailing the motley group grew longer and gloomier as this surprise visit to one of the country's 7.8 lakh anganwadi centres turned into a graphic illustration of that oft-heard phrase, "failure of the delivery system". But, for a new MP-led, UNICEF-supported 'Citizen's Initiative' that says it has been galvanised into action by the shameful findings on malnourished children from the latest National Family Health Survey, it was a fitting start. Poor monitoring and lack of accountability in the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDs), of which anganwadi services are the pivot, are not the only reasons why 46 per cent of Indian children remain undernourished (a figure virtually unchanged from six years ago). But they are vital ones. The young MPs, who stressed during the train journey from Delhi that their bipartisan pressure group wants to get beyond Delhi committee rooms and grapple with the ground realities of malnutrition, got reality alright.
In Madhya Pradesh, which has the country's highest percentage of malnourished children under three, reality is hard to avoid—even when it comes disguised, as it did at the next village.
"Kasam khake bolo ke maine tumhe dalia khilaya hai," (swear on oath, whether I feed you all porridge or not), was Rani exhorting the mothers of kids an hour later, after the nutrition question had been discussed threadbare by the visitors and villagers. I feed them everyday, she insisted—two scoops each, and I mix sabzi (vegetable), sugar or salt with the dalia. Not everyday, not two scoops but just one, of plain dalia with no seasoning, retorted the mothers. The MPs listened and sifted the evidence: bad news, but perhaps not as bad as the previous visit? As Panda pointed out—one scoop of dalia is better than none—and children were being immunised.
But there was more to be learnt. From a clump of makeshift huts inhabited by newcomers to the village—desperately poor migrant
tribals in search of work—who did not access even these faltering services. From a young Sahariya woman, educated up to Class 10, who had run this anganwadi before being removed from her post, to make way for Rani, a Brahmin from another village, apparently because the local MLA shared Rani's caste. But when Pilot asked if the tribal woman should be reinstated, he got a complex reply. It's because the Brahmin woman has the job, he was told, that we get the little we get. Remove her, and even that might disappear.
On to another village, more prosperous, higher up the caste ladder, and ergo, with a better functioning anganwadi. And therefore, more lessons to be learnt. Then, a post-mortem session with the district collector, followed by searching questions from the media. Standing by their commitment to bipartisanship, the MPs avoided shrill condemnation of the state government. The failures, it stressed, were distributed across the political spectrum. They also shielded Hussain, whose party rules MP, from embarrassing questions by Gwalior journalists. So far, so good. But what next? For a start, many more field trips, it appears, to other states. Other young MPs are slated to join in, such as the CPI(M)'s Mohammed Salim, bsp's Brajesh Pathak, and nominated MP Shyam Benegal. "Concerned citizens" from other worlds, too, including actresses Nandita Das and Sushmita Sen, industrialist Gautam Thapar, artistes, NGO heads, sportsmen...
To what end? "The figures are shocking," said Pilot. "We want to start a campaign, make this invisible issue visible, to do what we can to shift the allocation of resources, and help make the system more accountable." "And to work as a focus group in Parliament," added Panda, "so that we all speak on it with the same voice." Said Hussain: "Weddings are news, malnourishment isn't, we want to change that." "We're here because we feel passionately about this," said Sule. None of this adds up to a gameplan, yet the good intentions are evident.
After all, sincerity is one thing that's been lacking. For instance, despite several Supreme Court orders to universalise the ICDs programme, funding has been woefully short of requirements. "But malnourishment of children is a very complex issue, involving cultural practices, food habits, access to health, hygiene, water and mother's health," points out National Advisory Council member N.C. Saxena. "It's an issue that requires conceptual clarity." Therefore, he stresses, it's not enough to form a group, the group must be clear on what they're proposing. "Once they've made their field visits, let them produce a signed note on what they think the government should be doing. And let them involve civil society in taking up a block, or even part of a block, and turn it into an island of success, to establish best practices, and show how to sustain them." Sustain, that's the key word.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT