Why was he so depressed that he had no choice but to take his own life? Wasn't he supposed to laugh his sadness away? Wasn't he supposed to laugh our sadness away?
Was he depressed because he could not cope with Hollywood's lies, exploitation and profiteering? Was he so sad because he did not see a ray of hope at the end of the tunnel? Or was it something personal? We will never know.
But what we do know is that in spite of being a Hollywood celebrity, he put up some serious resistance. In Jumanji, he talked about Mother Nature and how the so-called civilized man destroyed it. Melodrama, yes. Typical Hollywood or Disney-style sensationalism, yes. Make-believe, fake, sentimental: yes too. Still, young boys and girls perhaps got an underlying message that if you keep destroying nature for urbanization and profiteering, nature will one day come to get you. And you'll have no place to hide. You can run, but you can't hide. And his super-rich businessman dad who shows up later as a crazy, NRA-type maniac with an assault rifle ready to kill anyone in front of him? No underlying message there? Are you kidding me?
Of course, it was not the only movie where Robin Williams talked about violence, and against violence. He did it in Good Morning, Vietnam. He voiced a strong opposition of America's mindless, global terror unleashed on poor, ordinary people in a faraway land. So, it was just a movie, and he only acted in it? Sure! But wasn't that a loud and clear message against global warfare, and one conscientious military man's resistance against it? Wasn't his satire something we all thought was hitting the bull's eye? One by one by one?
Looking back, did Good Morning, Vietnam and his role as a radio DJ cum journalist remind you of Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden? Perhaps, just a little?
I don't know about you. I always thought that Robin Williams was sometimes too loud, and too extravagant. His comic gestures sometimes ticked me off. I sometimes found them too blunt for my liking. Yet, looking back, through his meaty, American laugh, he did hit home runs every time. In his Good Morning, Vietnam, his Radio DJ was defeated, and the people in power returned him to America, because they couldn't take his strong, candid jokes anymore. But even in his defeat, he won. His acting won the hearts and minds of the American soldiers in the movie, and millions of people worldwide who got a chance to see through the smokescreen the military establishment and their politicians created for us.
I have not seen all his films. I also know I won't have time to talk about all his movies I actually saw, such as Mrs. Doubtfire, the man dressed as a woman to nanny his own divorce-separated kids. Or, Patch Adams where he was the cancer doctor in children's ward. Or, Fisher King. or, Mork and Mindy the TV serial. I'm sure I'm forgetting some more.
But I shall definitely remember Dead Poets Society, a 1989 movie where he acted as an English teacher at an aristocratic, conservative high school. It was the first Robin Williams movie I saw after coming to USA from India. I was completely blown away by the powerful story and his incredible performance as John Keating. His totally unorthodox teaching style shocked the school's administration, and was absolutely admired by his students. He taught them not just poetry—a subject nobody had paid any attention to before he came, but humanistic values. He taught them the purpose of life. He showed them that a global life outside of the straitjacket education system was indeed possible. He showed them how to breathe in open air, without any inhibition.
I have always believed in non-traditional, non-colonial teaching, and all my life I've tried to put my philosophy to practice. My first years in America were dark and depressing. I felt like I was suddenly given a lifelong exile in an Alcatraz-type prison, and could never escape from it. Suddenly, I found Robin Williams and Dead Poets Society, and learnt about a different side of America.
In Dead Poets Society, Keating's student Neil committed suicide, and the school administration asked Keating to leave. He leaves for good, but gets a standing ovation from the students he had mentored to be different human beings.
I find Robin Williams' own sudden end to be like a real-life replay of the movie. It is being called an apparent suicide. But he hasn't died. He and his one-of-a-kind fun persona will live on.
Partha Banerjee is a New York-based human rights activist and labour educator.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
#RIP. One of the finest actor comedian of our times.
The nation is in mourning today. I remember him most as a guest in nightly talk shows. His ebullience, energy and comic genius were seen best in that setting.
Dead Poet Society was a great movie and Williams was brilliant in it. No doubt a great actor and comic par excellence. Sad that his reel life couldn't help his real life where he took the final step. The "lines" between sanity and insanity are so fine, the color all so grey and the human mind so complex that it can all change in that one moment of crossing the line. RIP Robin Williams.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT