Rajat Thakur, 33, comes across as a fitness freak working out two hours a day. But two years ago, Thakur, obese at 112 kg, was hospitalized with his blood sugar soaring; his life vacillating between hope and despair for more than a month. “My first brush with diabetes brought me tantalizingly close to death,” he says.
Thakur is among millions of people in the country who are falling prey to diabetes each year. In 2003 more than 35 million people, representing 5.9 percent of the total population, had diabetes. However, by 2013 more than 65 million people, representing 8.5 percent of the population had the chronic disease, according to the International Federation of Diabetes.
Experts say the earlier notion of “inheriting” Type-2 Diabetes, where the pancreas secretes insufficient insulin, is now passé.
“Environmental factors contribute 80 percent to one becoming diabetic,” says Dr. Anoop Mishra, director of Fortis CDOC Hospital in Delhi. Diet and inactivity are primary environmental factors causing the disease. No one gene causes it, he adds. “90 percent of diabetics are obese, while those who aren’t have higher body fat,” he says.
The transition from traditional to processed food has ushered in the diabetes epidemic in the country, says Prof. Umesh Kapil of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences.
The foetal origin of diabetes can be related to overweight infants and children, found Dr. HPS Sachdeva of the Sitaram Bharatiya Research Institute in the national capital. Overweight children are more susceptible to the disease later in life, he says.
A study conducted by the National Institute of Nutrition (NIN) in Hyderabad found the number of overweight or obese adolescents in the 12-17 age group increase significantly in nine years. “We found 15 percent school-going adolescents overweight. Such kids were given to junk food more than the others. Improper diet was responsible for being overweight in 54 percent of the cases, while inactivity caused weight problems in 33 percent of the adolescents,” says A Laxmaiah, a scientist at the NIN who led the research team.
Diet varies across the length and breadth of the nation. A more traditional diet helps south Indians keep diabetes at bay, found a study conducted by Carrie Daniel Macdougall, an assistant professor at the University of Texas in USA. “Many Indians reported eating less healthy food, including high-fat dairy, fried snacks, and sweets, for instance, paneer, samosa, vada and sweet custard. The groups that commonly consumed such food were more likely to be obese,” Macdougall said. Terming the change in diet as “nutrition transition,” she said population adopting such a lifestyle is at risk of getting diabetes.
Researching the role of sugar-sweetened beverages in triggering the onset of Type 2 diabetes, Frank Hu, a professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard School of Public Health in the U.S. found those who drank one to two 12 ounce servings of such beverages daily increased their risk of developing diabetes by 26 percent, according to the American Diabetes Association.
For Thakur a chance meeting with his now trainer Harry John brought him to believe that one can lead a healthy life through exercises and dietary discretion, despite having diabetes. “I work out almost two hours a day. I know I cannot achieve a cure, but can still have a healthy life,” he says.
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
Media can contribute to addressng this problem by following a self imposed regulation on telecasting any food (be it KFC or Pepsi or Processed Oil) brand that is potentially unhealth. Will they?
Wonder how the media can speculate on the causes of diabetes, when none of the 'causes' mentioned, have been scientifically proven?
One day. a virus may be implicated in infecting the pancreas!
Indians dont deserve misinformation propagated by half literate journalists
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT