The pity is that I actually think our constituency has a good politician from the BJP. If he ever runs for Parliament, my opinion of him, by itself, would tempt me to vote for him. Yet I cannot forget he is from the BJP. Much as I’m also tempted by the logic that we must sometimes look at the candidate and not the party, I know this like the back of my hand: I will not vote for this party.
The pity is, too, that any party that presides over the plethora of scams of the last few years deserves no less than to be flung out of power. I mean the Congress, of course. And even so, I won’t vote BJP. They have done too much to turn away too many people like me. Perhaps they don’t care, but that’s the way it is.
To start, there’s the obsession with building a Ram temple in Ayodhya. Every time we hear that times have changed and young Indians aren’t interested in this tired old nag of an issue, somebody in the BJP will announce that building that temple is on their agenda. Whether India is afflicted with scams, or still widespread poverty, or poor primary education—whatever it is, the BJP returns, every time, to that lazy way to ask for votes: champion the Ram temple. Sure enough, it appears in their newest manifesto too. If you had to judge solely from the several decades that the BJP has demanded it—luckily, you don’t—this temple is this country’s highest priority. It must take singularly warped minds to hold tight to this warped vision for India for so long.
On from there is the way the BJP and fans label anyone remotely critical as “anti-Hindu”. A good example is a ‘List of Anti-Hindu Personalities and Their Intricate Connections’ that has been doing the rounds for some years now. (Full disclosure: I happen to be on that list.) This marvel of convoluted paranoia and illogic would be laughable if so many people didn’t appear to take it so seriously. Like: Among many places you’ll find it on the web is L.K. Advani’s own site, lkadvani.in, where it has resided since before our previous Lok Sabha election.
I know why these lists are made. “Anti-Hindu” is a surer way to get people’s bile up, after all, than a mere “anti-BJP”. (Similar are the labels “Pakistani agent”, “Italian origin” etc.) It’s also a lazy way to argue, used when bereft of anything more substantial. And in this case, it’s hilarious to note that also on the list are relatively recent BJP inductees Udit Raj and Subramanian Swamy. “Anti-Hindu Personalities”—that’s you, kind sirs.
On from there...I could go on, with plenty more reasons not to vote BJP. Among them, the party’s unwillingness to see justice done for horrific crimes. Above all, though, I believe their politics demeans India. I believe we have the people, the talent and the passion in this country to take on the world. But the BJP chooses instead to systematically turn Indian against Indian. This applies to the “anti-Hindu” label it uses freely, it applies to the lies and suspicion it directs at its critics, it applies to episodes of murderous violence that have been left to fester. For me, all this is unforgivable.
And when you call them on it, the BJP’s supporters have only this particularly brainless response: “But the Congress also does crappy things.” Well yes, it does. In fact, crappiness from the Congress was the reason this country grew repulsed by that party in the first place. But when they came to power, the BJP turned out to be no different from the Congress, and in many ways even worse. (To my knowledge, not even the Congress holds on to lists of ‘Anti-Hindu Personalities’.)
That’s where plenty of us are today: left with no national political alternative to choose from. I’m talking about the plenty of us who live ordinary Indian lives, pay our Indian taxes, obey Indian laws. I mean Indians who care what kinds of lives our fellow Indians—indeed, our fellow humans—live, because it’s as simple as John Donne once explained: no man is an island and any man’s suffering diminishes us all. I mean Indians who want to see India wise, strong and compassionate, a force for good on a violent, fractured planet. Our great dilemma is that on fundamental counts like these, our two major political parties have failed us. I won’t shy away from the challenge this dilemma poses when I head for the voting booth. But it does also leave me with this certainty: I won’t vote for the BJP.
Dilip D’Souza is the author of The Curious Case of Binayak Sen
Reading Dilip D’Souza’s Why I Won’t Vote BJP (April 14), I was left wondering what one must do if none of the candidates is worth voting for! Why vote at all?
M. Kumar, Delhi
What a waste of space! We don’t need D’Souza to tell us he’s not going to vote for BJP. Anyone who’s read him over the years should know.
Maha, New Jersey, US
Rahul Gandhi is well-meaning, unlike the rest in the Congress. I suggest that those who have a problem making a choice should support only Rahul and the candidates he has directly chosen and reject all the rest from the Congress.
Francis D’Souza, Delhi
Why does Dilip D’Souza have to write in a national magazine about who he will or will not vote for? Does he think what he alone thinks is correct?
If a Christian or Muslim says he’s going to vote for the BJP and explains why, that would have made for a readable piece. But, of course, Outlook wouldn’t publish that. In fact, would it publish a piece by M.J. Akbar saying why he is going to vote for the BJP?
P.B. Joshipura, Suffolk, Virginia, US
I don’t care if Dilip D’Souza doesn’t vote for the BJP. I wouldn’t care to know why he votes for the Congress either.
Achutha Bhat, Bangalore
I take offence when someone uses the excuse of secularism to try to prevent a patriotic party focusing on development from coming to power. We want development and progress. Modi seems like the man who will make it happen. I’ll vote for the lotus—the symbol of prosperity and life.
Ananya J. Lal, Delhi
Hardly surprising that Dilip D’Souza is not voting for the BJP. But who cares!
Pramod Srivastava, Delhi
Let us all be grateful to Dilip D’Souza for the heroic civilising mission he has undertaken for all of us.
Pradip Singh,Stafford, UK
I agree with Dilip D’Souza that politicians are all the same. But I still want to try out a change of guard. By the way, I’m an atheist, so no Ram for me. What should I do?
Som Sharma, Berlin, Maryland, US
Who would want Dilip D’Souza’s vote?
Prakash Adhyapak, Belgaum
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
They are all the same, I agree. But I want to try a change, hoping it would work. I am atheist, no Ram for me.
Here comes an enlightened being bringing the light of Christ to the idol worshipping savages living in total darkness.
We are grateful for this heroic civilizing mission.
Good to see the BJP supporters with the "brainless responses" have been giving their brainless responses in comments on this article. The less civilized end of brainless chatter takes place on twitter and other social media... http://deshisense.blogspot.com/2013/09/fascist-chatter.html
D'Souza not voting BJP ? That is one vote less in the margin of victory for BJP.
Your vote is not needed.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT