Extracts from this interview with the former Indian diplomat appeared in print
Is Israel becoming a rogue state and is the international community totally powerless to rein it in?
A rogue state is one that functions with total disregard for international law, norms and values; indeed, it is indifferent to any constraints on its conduct, arguing that it faces such extraordinary threat that for its self-preservation and the protection of its interests and values, it cannot allow any restrictions on actions taken by it. By this yard-stick, Israel has been a rogue state for several years. Since the 1980s, as better understanding of the Israel-Palestine dispute has emerged in the international community, Israel's actions against the Palestinians have become even more uncompromising and even brutal, and almost entirely against international sentiment. Since the mid-1990s, it has in fact given up all interest in pursuing the peace process, while steadily expanding its settlements in the occupied territories in violation of international law and all norms of natural justice.
I must admit that what passes for the international community, which, in our iniquitous world order, means the western countries, has neither the capacity nor the desire to confront Israel and its maximalist agenda. The Europeans, whatever their private views, are silenced by the fear of being labelled anti-Semitic. The American political establishment, the media and academia are either thoroughly compromised or too frightened to raise their voice against the blatant injustices and brutality heaped by Israel upon the Palestinians. So, yes, there is today no power within or outside Israel that can restrain this violent behemoth.
Is the Israel’s ongoing military action on Gaza justified? Can it go on killing innocent civilians in the name of dealing with Hamas militants?
In seeking to understand Israel-Palestine developments, it is important to get the origin of events and their sequence right. The origins of the current crisis lie in the failure of the Obama regime to convince Israel to re-start the moribund peace process, which had been touted as a significant pillar of the administration's foreign policy. Israel succeeded in bending the Obama presidency to its will in the same way it bent and broke others earlier -- by mobilising its formidable lobby. After achieving this, Israel knew it had a free hand to pursue its agenda in Gaza -- the emasculation of Hamas through the physical annihilation of its leaders, the systematic destruction of Gaza's infrastructure and the killing of the largest possible number of Palestinians in the shortest possible time. This is a totally unequal encounter, since Israel is the most powerful military force in the region while its enemies have no army, navy or air force to confront it.
Hamas however seeks to remind Israel that it will not shy away from this unequal confrontation. Its feeble missiles are the only weapons it has; they do hardly any damage, but they do affirm to the Israelis that Hamas and the Palestinian people will not stand without protest before the Israeli firing squad. Of course, Israel uses this to paint its victims as terrorists bent on its destruction! Hamas's missiles are only an excuse for the latest attack. Do recall that Israel had launched similar violent attacks in Gaza in 2008-09 and then again in 2012.This time Israel believes the global and regional scenario is propitious: the US has been silenced, while the Arabs are divided and preoccupied with domestic issues. This is therefore the best moment to make one more effort to destroy Hamas.
And, yes, there is no limit that anyone can place on Israel's violence for after all it is fighting for its survival against very formidable foes!
Why has the liberal Israeli/Jewish voice been so silent during this operation of Tel Aviv? Has that voice been lost?
Israel's liberal voice, though popular in international academic circles, actually carries very little influence inside Israel or even in the Jewish community at large. The overwhelming majority of Israelis, and their supporters abroad, have bought the line that Israel faces an existential threat from fanatical Muslims who are resorting to terror to destroy it. For now at least we should not expect these liberals to restrain their co-nationals. Please recall that, over the years, Israel has evolved into a "security state'' where the influence of the religious and political right-wing is overwhelming. This is best represented by the settler community which is impelled by messianic zeal in asserting its right to the Promised Land which has no defined borders.
Why is the Arab world so silent during all this?
The Arab world as a whole is experiencing an unprecedented crisis. It has several dimensions which taken together have paralysed the Arab leaderships. Briefly, the sources of the crisis are:
Israel has taken advantage of this instability and confusion to launch its attack on Gaza, knowing full well that the Arabs are incapable politically and diplomatically of doing anything to support their beleaguered brethren in Palestine. In fact, Israel believes that some Arab regimes might even welcome the destruction of Hamas as a Brotherhood affiliate!
Thank you to all those who have taken the trouble to read the article and share their thoughts. Out of the arguments made here, there are two that perhaps need answering. So here they go.
1. The first part of the article compares outcomes (relative percentages of population of the religions concerned) irrespective of the process that led to those outcomes - whether immigration, relatively faster population growth or conversions. This was for two reasons. One, to put the figure of 2.3 per cent in "numerical perspective", as the article itself explained. The second reason was that outcomes are ultimately what the crux of debate is about. The rest of the article in any case dealt with process - or conversions in this case, from both a contemporary and historical perspective.
2. Some commenters have tried to cast doubts on the reliability of Census 2001. Those who do this should bear in mind that Census 2001 was conducted by a BJP government. Considering the extreme importance that BJP gives to this issue, it would be reasonable to expect that IF it had perceived a problem with the methodology that was distorting the numbers, it would have fixed it. As the article mentioned, BJP or BJP-supported governments have been in power for 10 of the last 40 years, or about a quarter of the time, and the only reasonable conclusion one can arrive at is that any misreporting of numbers, real or perceived, would be marginal and hence, not of importance.
To all other arguments made, my answer is the following: Please read the article again, with particular focus on the quotations of Vivekananda and Monier Williams, and the history of the missionary efforts in Bengal and their outcome.
> "A rogue state is one that functions with total disregard for international law, norms and values; indeed, it is indifferent to any constraints on its conduct, arguing that it faces such extraordinary threat that for its self-preservation and the protection of its interests and values, it cannot allow any restrictions on actions taken by it. By this yard-stick, Israel has been a rogue state for several years."
Now they are biting the hand that feeds them! For the first time we see this headline in the middle of a war: "US Fuming Over Israeli Criticism of Kerry".
I feel you are a rogue former diplomat. You should work for Indian national interest.
Israel is india's 2nd largest suppliers of weapon, ahead of USA.
India is well advised to be away from supporting Palestine as it does not do any good for India.
If Israel is a "rogue" state, what does that make all of its neighbors.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT