FOR a much harassed Jayalalitha it has been the unkindest cut. While she was at the receiving end from her enemies, the AIADMK chief never expected her onetime foster son V.N. Sudhakaran to turn against her. Sudhakaran has not only distanced himself from Jayalalitha, who bathed him in crores for his wedding while she was in power, he blames her for the AIADMK debacle in the last assembly elections and accuses the former chief minister's camp of threatening his wife and child.
"After leaving Poes Garden, there has been no contact whatsoever with Poes Garden.
Such is his acrimony towards the lady he once described as his guiding light that he says his "Independence Day" was August 25, 1996—the day Jayalalitha unceremoniously disowned him. This revelation is strange, coming as it does from someone who had made capital during Jayalalitha's chief ministership. Sudhakaran was considered a power centre and a part of Jayalalitha's kitchen cabinet that she ran from her Poes Garden residence.
Now Sudhakaran blames Jayalalitha and his aunt Sasikala for all the ills that have befallen him. He even alleges that the AIADMK chief had adopted him as a foster son without either consulting him or his parents: "Jayalalitha has nothing to do with my marriage. My parents talked to Sivaji Saar's (Sivaji Ganesan) family and sought his blessings. On the day of the engagement, Jayalalitha announced that I was her foster son. Neither I nor my parents were consulted before the announcement."
The out-of-favour Sudhakaran even sees an uncharitable motive in Jayalalitha's move. He alleges that she adopted him to show Sivaji Ganesan that she was the boss: "Sivaji Saar has always been a very senior and highly respected person in Tamil cinema. Jayalalitha madam had to stand up as a mark of respect whenever he entered the sets. By adopting me, she became the chief representative of the groom's side; Sivaji Saar was relegated to being a bride's emissary. In our patriarchal system, you know the power the groom's side wields in marriages."
But what about his own excesses during Jayalalitha's regime? He has his explanations. For his extravagant wedding to Sivaji Ganesan's granddaughter Satyavati, he blames Jayalalitha and Sasikala. About the extra-constitutional functioning of Super-Duper TV, the cable network arm of JJ TV, he says he could do little but obey orders. He says his newfound wealth, which investigating agencies claim are in excess of Rs 50 crore, was given to him by Sasikala and that he has no idea about the source of the funds.
According to Sudhakaran, Jayalalitha is responsible for the AIADMK's defeat and that as a true follower it is his duty to restore MGR's legacy. But does he have the political acumen to take on a task when many experienced AIADMK leaders have failed? "I had been in Poes Garden for more than three years and have been a witness to the wrong type of politics. I have learnt from the mistakes. I know how MGR's name was sidelined. Hence, by systematically and meticulously turning the clock back I can bring all MGR followers under one banner. To be a good Christian there is no need to be a contemporary of Christ, a Marxist need not have to be an associate of Marx and a Gandhian may not have seen Gandhi. Similarly, to establish MGR's legacy one need not have been of that generation".
A well-scripted reason but not everyone is convinced that Sudhakaran's tirade against his former foster mother is genuine. Sceptics point out that his revolt could well have been engineered by Jayalalitha and Sasikala—some say it is a ploy to use Sudhakaran to woo AIADMK rebels back to the fold. The former chief minister always had a confidant masquerading as her critic—Sasikala's husband Natarajan played this part once. Whether Sudhakaran has merely stepped into his uncle's shoes is difficult to tell. But for the record he would like to be known as a Jayalalitha-baiter.
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT