Crime Against Humanity
into the carnage in Gujarat
List of Incidents and Evidence
By Concerned Citizens Tribunal -Gujarat 2002
Incidents of Post-Godhra Violence
Report of Forensic Science Laboratory, State of Gujarat
New Mental Corner,
Spot investigation report No.2 regarding CR No. 9/2002. Godhra Railway Police Station
A team of forensic experts had visited the place of offence on 3/5/2002 in which along
with the under signed, Shri AN Joshi, Scientific Officer, Ahmedabad was included. In order to
recreate the real picture of how the offence was committed on the day of incident, one coach
of the train was kept on the same spot. With the help of different types of containers experi-
mental demonstrations were also carried out by using liquids inside the said coach. On the basis
of which the following conclusions were made.
It was found that the height of the window of the coach was around 7 ft. from the
ground at the place. Under this circumstance, it was not possible to throw any inflammable
fluid inside from outside the coach from any bucket or carboy, because by doing this, most of
the fluid was getting thrown outside. At the place of the incidents there was one heap of grit
of three feet height at a distance of around 14-ft. in the southern side of the coach. Water was
thrown on the windows of the coach with the help of bucket standing on the top of the said
heap, in that case only about 10 to 15% of the water went inside and the rest of the quantity
was spilled outside itself. Thus if the inflammable fluid is thrown from outside then major part
of it would fall around the track outside and catch fire and cause damage to the outer part of
bottom side of the coach. But after examination of the coach and the track, no effect was
found of the fire on bottom side below the windows of the coach. By taking in to consideration this fact and also the burning pattern of the outer side of the coach, a conclusion can be
drawn that no inflammable fluid had been thrown inside from outside of the coach.
2. There also appears to be no possibility that any inflammable liquid was thrown through
the door of the bogie.
3. By standing in the passage between the compartment of the bogey and the northern side
door of the eastern side of the bogie, water was poured towards the western side from a
container with a wide mouth like a bucket; in that case most part of the bogie was covered
with 60 liters of water. By pouring the water in this manner, the water went only towards the
West and no part of it came out of the door nor did it go towards the latrine side.
4. On the basis of the above experimental demonstration such a conclusion can be drawn
that 60 liters of inflammable liquid was poured towards the western side by using a wide
mouthed container by standing on the passage between the northern side door of the eastern
side of the S-6 coach and the compartment of seat No. 72 and coach was set on fire immediately thereafter. If the period after the train had started from Godhra Railway Station, intensity
of fire, the degree of burn of the objects that were inside the bogie etc. are taken into account,
it can also be concluded that a large quantity (around 60 liters) of highly inflammable fluid was
used to set the aforesaid fire and that the fire had spread very rapidly.
Dr. M S Dahiya
Spot investigation report No. 1 regarding CR No. 9/2/2002.
Godhra Railway Police Station
The forensic experts had visited the place of offence on 1/5/2002. In the team of the
experts along with the undersigned, the other experts were Shri AR Vaghela, Scientific Officer,
Vadodara, Shri Yogesh Patel, Scientific Officer (Mobile), Panchmahal and Shri SI Desai, Pho-
tographer, Surat. The experts have made detailed investigation of the burnt down S-6 coach
of the Sabarmati Express train. The said coach was kept in the yard of Godhra railway station.
The observations made on the basis of the informations learnt by the detailed examination of
the coach are as under.
1. A large number of hit marks were observed on the outer part of the southern side of the
burnt out S-6 coach which were due to stones. Apart from this a large number of stones were
found scattered inside the coach and similarly glass pieces were also seen. It was found that the
said glass pieces were of the windows. From these observations it is possible to say that there
was large scale stone pelting on the coach from outside and the glasses of the southern side
was primarily broken due to stone throwing and the glass of the northern side were broken
due to the heat of the fire.
2. From the condition of the colour on the door of the coach, the burning pattern, condi-
tion of the hand lock, the marks of the melting Aluminum strips of the frame of the window
etc. it can be established that both the east-west doors of the northern side of the coach and
similarly the eastern door of the southern side, thus a total of three doors were opened at the
time of the incident of fire and the door in the west direction of the southern side was closed.
3. Out of the windows in the southern side, one rod of one of the windows was found to
be broken due to heat. As the height of the lower part of the window was at the height of
more than 7 ft. from the ground, it negates the possibility of force on the rod from window
side. Further it was not found that any instrument was used to bend the rod. Thus, it becomes
clear that the rod was attempted to be broken by the use of force from inside. It appears that
the other rods had become loose due to the melting of joints due to heat.
4. By observing the burning pattern inside the coach, its degree, the depth and the eligatering
pattern on the floor, it appears that the fire has spread inside the coach very rapidly. Further, by
observing the intensity of the eligatering pattern on the floor, it appears that the fire has started
from the eastern side of the coach and thereafter spread towards western side rapidly. Further,
it appears that the intensity and proportion of the burning of the objects inside the coach was
very high, up to around 80% part of the east to west side whereas in the 20% part, the intensity
of burning was less in comparison with 80% part.
5. No sign was observed of the use of any corrosive fluid like acid in the said fire.
6. By observing the condition of the frames of the windows of the coach it appears that
all the windows of the coach were closed during the time of the fire.
Dr. M.S. Dahiya
We at Outlookindia.com welcome feedback and your comments, including scathing criticism
1. Scathing, passionate, even angry critiques are welcome, but please do not indulge in abuse and invective. Our Primary concern is to keep the debate civil. We urge our users to try and express their disagreements without being disagreeable. Personal attacks are not welcome. No ad hominem please.
2. Please do not post the same message again and again in the same or different threads
3. Please keep your responses confined to the subject matter of the article you are responding to. Please note that our comments section is not a general free-for-all but for feedback to articles/blogs posted on the site
4. Our endeavour is to keep these forums unmoderated and unexpurgated. But if any of the above three conditions are violated, we reserve the right to delete any comment that we deem objectionable and also to withdraw posting privileges from the abuser. Please also note that hate-speech is punishable by law and in extreme circumstances, we may be forced to take legal action by tracing the IP addresses of the poster.
5. If someone is being abusive or personal, or generally being a troll or a flame-baiter, please do not descend to their level. The best response to such posters is to ignore them and send us a message at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT
6. Please do not copy and paste copyrighted material. If you do think that an article elsewhere has relevance to the point you wish to make, please only quote what is considered fair-use and provide a link to the article under question.
7. There is no particular outlookindia.com line on any subject. The views expressed in our opinion section are those of the author concerned and not that of all of outlookindia.com or all its authors.
8. Please also note that you are solely responsible for the comments posted by you on the site. The comments could be deleted or edited entirely at our discretion if we find them objectionable. However, the mere fact of their existence on our site does not mean that we necessarily approve of their contents. In short, the onus of responsibility for the comments remains solely with the authors thereof. Outlookindia.com or any of its group publications, may, however, retains the right to publish any of these comments, with or without editing, in any medium whatsoever. It is therefore in your own interest to be careful before posting.
9.Outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for how any search engine -- such as Google, Bing etc -- caches or displays these comments. Please note that you are solely responsible for posting these comments and it is a privilege being granted to our registered users which can be withdrawn in case of abuse. To reiterate:
a. Comments once posted can only be deleted at the discretion of outlookindia.com
b. The comments reflect the views of the authors and not of outlookindia.com
c. outlookindia.com is not responsible in any manner whatsoever for the way search engines cache or display these comments
d. Please therefore take due caution before you post any comments as your words could potentially be used against you
10. We have an online thread for our comments policy:
You are welcome to post your suggestions here or in case you have a specific issue, to directly email us at Mail AT outlookindia DOT com with the subject header COMPLAINT